Institutional arrangements to decarbonise rural land in Australia

Ian Hannam
{"title":"Institutional arrangements to decarbonise rural land in Australia","authors":"Ian Hannam","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This chapter discusses various institutional arrangements associated with rural decarbonisation law, policy and programs in Australia. Climate change is of significant global and national importance that there are numerous key bodies contributing to the development of sustainable environmental policy and best-practice frameworks. However there remains a need for a long-term approach to the risk-management of the impacts on farmers of various instruments aimed at managing rural decarbonisation and protecting Australia's natural ‘on-farm’ capital advantage. A clear and comprehensive soil carbon management strategy for rural areas in Australia is essential to ensure that rural land holders can access a variety of methods and technologies that will be viable and substantially improve on-farm carbon management and reduce the emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. There is a number of ways to address the complexities, uncertainties, fragmented supply chains and the potential unfairness of additionality requirements, which may perversely impact on those who have been good land stewards. There is also a variety of ways to reduce the inefficiencies of the processes applied to approve and supervise the different methodologies. More effective landholder driven engagement is critical to maximise involvement, especially at the farmer and service provider level, and to increase the carbon, biodiversity and farm water schemes available. Fundamentally, there will be many benefits from an institutional system in Australia that can adopt and harmonize across international and national standards and reporting methodologies that transition to the local level and assist farmers to gain access to aligned end-markets, capital and stakeholder support that will improve management of the carbon cycle of rural land for the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000054/pdfft?md5=a93123b708d532c2af499da8906918cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006224000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses various institutional arrangements associated with rural decarbonisation law, policy and programs in Australia. Climate change is of significant global and national importance that there are numerous key bodies contributing to the development of sustainable environmental policy and best-practice frameworks. However there remains a need for a long-term approach to the risk-management of the impacts on farmers of various instruments aimed at managing rural decarbonisation and protecting Australia's natural ‘on-farm’ capital advantage. A clear and comprehensive soil carbon management strategy for rural areas in Australia is essential to ensure that rural land holders can access a variety of methods and technologies that will be viable and substantially improve on-farm carbon management and reduce the emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. There is a number of ways to address the complexities, uncertainties, fragmented supply chains and the potential unfairness of additionality requirements, which may perversely impact on those who have been good land stewards. There is also a variety of ways to reduce the inefficiencies of the processes applied to approve and supervise the different methodologies. More effective landholder driven engagement is critical to maximise involvement, especially at the farmer and service provider level, and to increase the carbon, biodiversity and farm water schemes available. Fundamentally, there will be many benefits from an institutional system in Australia that can adopt and harmonize across international and national standards and reporting methodologies that transition to the local level and assist farmers to gain access to aligned end-markets, capital and stakeholder support that will improve management of the carbon cycle of rural land for the future.

澳大利亚农村土地去碳化的制度安排
本章将讨论与澳大利亚农村去碳化法律、政策和计划相关的各种制度安排。气候变化对全球和国家都具有重要意义,因此有许多关键机构都在为制定可持续环境政策和最佳实践框架做出贡献。然而,我们仍然需要一种长期的风险管理方法,来应对各种旨在管理农村去碳化和保护澳大利亚自然 "农场 "资本优势的手段对农民造成的影响。为确保农村土地所有者能够获得各种可行的方法和技术,并大幅改善农场碳管理和减少大气中二氧化碳的排放,一项明确而全面的澳大利亚农村地区土壤碳管理战略至关重要。有许多方法可以解决复杂性、不确定性、供应链分散以及额外性要求的潜在不公平性等问题,这些问题可能会对那些土地管理良好的人产生不利影响。此外,还有多种方法可减少用于批准和监督不同方法的流程效率低下的问题。由土地所有者推动的更有效的参与对于最大限度地提高参与度至关重要,尤其是在农民和服务提供商层面,同时对于增加可利用的碳、生物多样性和农田用水计划也至关重要。从根本上说,澳大利亚的制度体系将带来诸多益处,它可以采用并协调过渡到地方层面的国际和国家标准及报告方法,并帮助农民获得统一的终端市场、资本和利益相关者的支持,从而改善未来农村土地的碳循环管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信