Artificial intelligence vs. autonomous decision-making in streaming platforms: A mixed-method approach

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ana Rita Gonçalves , Diego Costa Pinto , Saleh Shuqair , Marlon Dalmoro , Anna S. Mattila
{"title":"Artificial intelligence vs. autonomous decision-making in streaming platforms: A mixed-method approach","authors":"Ana Rita Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Diego Costa Pinto ,&nbsp;Saleh Shuqair ,&nbsp;Marlon Dalmoro ,&nbsp;Anna S. Mattila","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although the empowerment of technology is of great value to society, little is known about its downstream effects on consumers' decisions. This research draws on the expectation–confirmation theory and autonomy in artificial intelligence (AI) and investigates how AI (vs. autonomous choice) has detrimental effects on consumer outcomes, creating an autonomy-technology tension — i.e., the conflict arising from AI technology diminishing consumers' autonomy in their choices. Four studies using a mixed-method approach reveal that the use of AI recommendations in streaming platforms creates an autonomy-technology tension that reduces consumers' performance expectancy, thus lowering their satisfaction. However, such effects are contingent on the nature of the AI recommendations. While a mismatch between AI recommendations and consumer preferences might backfire, AI's negative effect is mitigated when choices match consumers' preferences. We make significant theoretical and practical contributions to empirical research on consumers' sense of autonomy while interacting with AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102748"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223001299/pdfft?md5=9c8f5b1cdd022050472096509da411fb&pid=1-s2.0-S0268401223001299-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223001299","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the empowerment of technology is of great value to society, little is known about its downstream effects on consumers' decisions. This research draws on the expectation–confirmation theory and autonomy in artificial intelligence (AI) and investigates how AI (vs. autonomous choice) has detrimental effects on consumer outcomes, creating an autonomy-technology tension — i.e., the conflict arising from AI technology diminishing consumers' autonomy in their choices. Four studies using a mixed-method approach reveal that the use of AI recommendations in streaming platforms creates an autonomy-technology tension that reduces consumers' performance expectancy, thus lowering their satisfaction. However, such effects are contingent on the nature of the AI recommendations. While a mismatch between AI recommendations and consumer preferences might backfire, AI's negative effect is mitigated when choices match consumers' preferences. We make significant theoretical and practical contributions to empirical research on consumers' sense of autonomy while interacting with AI.

流媒体平台中的人工智能与自主决策:混合方法
尽管技术赋权对社会具有重大价值,但人们对其对消费者决策的下游影响却知之甚少。本研究借鉴了预期确认理论和人工智能(AI)中的自主性,探讨了人工智能(与自主选择相比)如何对消费者的结果产生不利影响,从而造成自主性与技术之间的紧张关系--即人工智能技术削弱了消费者的自主选择权而产生的冲突。采用混合方法进行的四项研究表明,流媒体平台中人工智能推荐的使用造成了自主-技术紧张关系,降低了消费者的绩效预期,从而降低了他们的满意度。然而,这种影响取决于人工智能推荐的性质。虽然人工智能推荐与消费者偏好不匹配可能会适得其反,但当选择与消费者偏好相匹配时,人工智能的负面影响就会减轻。我们对消费者在与人工智能互动时的自主感的实证研究做出了重要的理论和实践贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信