Potential evaluation and implementation strategy for pocket park construction in high-density urban areas: A case study in Dalian, China

IF 3.1 1区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Jing Dong, Ruonan Guo, Fei Guo, Jun Cai
{"title":"Potential evaluation and implementation strategy for pocket park construction in high-density urban areas: A case study in Dalian, China","authors":"Jing Dong,&nbsp;Ruonan Guo,&nbsp;Fei Guo,&nbsp;Jun Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.foar.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As an important element of urban renewal in highly urbanized areas, pocket parks with small size, flexible layout and daily accessibility are becoming a major component of green infrastructure and the mainstay of outdoor recreation space expansion in high-density urban centers. Nevertheless, the absence of a comprehensive framework for evaluating the potential of pocket park construction (PPC), one that integrates diverse influencing factors on a macro scale, has resulted in the random installation of such spaces, often failing to optimize the utilization of urban land. Addressing this critical lacuna, we propose an approach to evaluate PPC potential from a city-scale perspective, which is used to support the determination of which land units should be prioritized for PPC. A complete and feasible workflow was also established to identify potential land units, construct an index system for PPC combining demand and supply levels, quantitatively calculate indices based on remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS), accurately evaluate PPC potential using an entropy-weighted TOPSIS model, and develop targeted renewal strategies. A case study in Dalian, China, demonstrated the applicability and implications of the workflow. The results showed that it is flexible and easy to adapt to different local contexts, allowing evaluators to introduce parameters considering the availability of local data, and will help decision makers to build pocket parks in the most effective plots, providing a strong reference for high-quality development in other high-density urban centers facing the contradiction between ecological construction and land scarcity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51662,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Architectural Research","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 319-334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523001140/pdfft?md5=f969e972d67994117749be400cdd2c49&pid=1-s2.0-S2095263523001140-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523001140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an important element of urban renewal in highly urbanized areas, pocket parks with small size, flexible layout and daily accessibility are becoming a major component of green infrastructure and the mainstay of outdoor recreation space expansion in high-density urban centers. Nevertheless, the absence of a comprehensive framework for evaluating the potential of pocket park construction (PPC), one that integrates diverse influencing factors on a macro scale, has resulted in the random installation of such spaces, often failing to optimize the utilization of urban land. Addressing this critical lacuna, we propose an approach to evaluate PPC potential from a city-scale perspective, which is used to support the determination of which land units should be prioritized for PPC. A complete and feasible workflow was also established to identify potential land units, construct an index system for PPC combining demand and supply levels, quantitatively calculate indices based on remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS), accurately evaluate PPC potential using an entropy-weighted TOPSIS model, and develop targeted renewal strategies. A case study in Dalian, China, demonstrated the applicability and implications of the workflow. The results showed that it is flexible and easy to adapt to different local contexts, allowing evaluators to introduce parameters considering the availability of local data, and will help decision makers to build pocket parks in the most effective plots, providing a strong reference for high-quality development in other high-density urban centers facing the contradiction between ecological construction and land scarcity.

高密度城市地区口袋公园建设的潜力评估与实施策略:中国大连案例研究
作为高度城市化地区城市更新的重要组成部分,袖珍公园具有面积小、布局灵活、日常可达性强等特点,正在成为绿色基础设施的重要组成部分,也是高密度城市中心拓展户外休闲空间的主要方式。然而,由于缺乏一个全面的框架来评估口袋公园建设(PPC)的潜力,无法在宏观上综合考虑各种影响因素,导致口袋公园的随意设置,往往无法优化城市土地的利用。针对这一关键缺陷,我们提出了一种从城市规模角度评估袖珍公园潜力的方法,用于支持确定哪些土地单位应优先建设袖珍公园。此外,我们还建立了一套完整可行的工作流程,以确定潜在的土地单元,结合需求和供应水平构建 PPC 指标体系,基于遥感(RS)和地理信息系统(GIS)定量计算指标,利用熵权 TOPSIS 模型准确评估 PPC 潜力,并制定有针对性的更新策略。在中国大连进行的一项案例研究证明了该工作流程的适用性和意义。研究结果表明,该工作流程灵活、易于适应不同的地方环境,评估人员可以根据当地数据的可用性引入参数,并将帮助决策者在最有效的地块建设口袋公园,为其他面临生态建设与土地稀缺矛盾的高密度城市中心的高质量发展提供有力参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
430
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Architectural Research is an international journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, and case studies to promote rapid communication and exchange among scholars, architects, and engineers. This journal introduces and reviews significant and pioneering achievements in the field of architecture research. Subject areas include the primary branches of architecture, such as architectural design and theory, architectural science and technology, urban planning, landscaping architecture, existing building renovation, and architectural heritage conservation. The journal encourages studies based on a rigorous scientific approach and state-of-the-art technology. All published papers reflect original research works and basic theories, models, computing, and design in architecture. High-quality papers addressing the social aspects of architecture are also welcome. This journal is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original manuscripts submitted in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信