The Hegemony of South Africa and the Free Movement of Persons in SADC: Challenges and Perspectives

Tebogo Kegomoditswe Mapogo
{"title":"The Hegemony of South Africa and the Free Movement of Persons in SADC: Challenges and Perspectives","authors":"Tebogo Kegomoditswe Mapogo","doi":"10.51867/ajernet.5.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The free movement of persons faces many challenges in the SADC region. Currently, there is no solid regional framework that governs it. As a result, it is managed by several varying bilateral agreements between the member states.  This study aims to evaluate the impact the hegemony of South Africa has on the free movement of persons in the SADC region.  The specific objectives of the study were to examine the effect the hegemony of South Africa has on visa openness in the SADC region, to describe the hegemony of South Africa in relation to ratification of the protocol on the facilitation of movement of persons in the SADC region, and finally to evaluate the influence the hegemony of South Africa has on border procedures in the SADC region. The qualitative research method was undertaken in pursuit of fulfilling the study objectives. The data for this study was collected from a selection of official statistics, technical reports, and scholarly journals.  The findings of the study suggest that the hegemony of South Africa has greatly contributed and shaped the status of the free movement of persons in the region. South Africa has negotiated itself into favourable positions with its fellow SADC member states that have placed them at an advantage. South Africa benefits from favourable visa openness and border procedures. It’s contribution in influencing the Protocol on the Facilitation of Movement of Persons has resulted in it being among the countries that have ratified the protocol which has more relaxed provisions.  The study recommends harmonised free movement agreements that have a more regional outlook and an approach to the free movement of persons that has a bearing that is not centred around security and negative perceptions.","PeriodicalId":360060,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Empirical Research","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Empirical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The free movement of persons faces many challenges in the SADC region. Currently, there is no solid regional framework that governs it. As a result, it is managed by several varying bilateral agreements between the member states.  This study aims to evaluate the impact the hegemony of South Africa has on the free movement of persons in the SADC region.  The specific objectives of the study were to examine the effect the hegemony of South Africa has on visa openness in the SADC region, to describe the hegemony of South Africa in relation to ratification of the protocol on the facilitation of movement of persons in the SADC region, and finally to evaluate the influence the hegemony of South Africa has on border procedures in the SADC region. The qualitative research method was undertaken in pursuit of fulfilling the study objectives. The data for this study was collected from a selection of official statistics, technical reports, and scholarly journals.  The findings of the study suggest that the hegemony of South Africa has greatly contributed and shaped the status of the free movement of persons in the region. South Africa has negotiated itself into favourable positions with its fellow SADC member states that have placed them at an advantage. South Africa benefits from favourable visa openness and border procedures. It’s contribution in influencing the Protocol on the Facilitation of Movement of Persons has resulted in it being among the countries that have ratified the protocol which has more relaxed provisions.  The study recommends harmonised free movement agreements that have a more regional outlook and an approach to the free movement of persons that has a bearing that is not centred around security and negative perceptions.
南非的霸权与南部非洲发展共同体的人员自由流动:挑战与前景
人员自由流动在南部非洲发展共同体地区面临许多挑战。目前,还没有一个坚实的地区框架来管理这一问题。因此,只能通过成员国之间若干不同的双边协议来管理。 本研究旨在评估南非霸权对南部非洲发展共同体地区人员自由流动的影响。 本研究的具体目标是考察南非霸权对南部非洲发展共同体地区签证开放的影响,描述南非霸权与批准南部非洲发展共同体地区人员流动便利化议定书的关系,最后评估南非霸权对南部非洲发展共同体地区边境程序的影响。为实现研究目标,我们采用了定性研究方法。本研究的数据选自官方统计数据、技术报告和学术期刊。 研究结果表明,南非的霸权在很大程度上影响了该地区人员自由流动的状况。南非通过谈判与南部非洲发展共同体(SADC)其他成员国达成了有利的协议,使自己处于优势地位。南非受益于有利的签证开放和边境程序。南非在影响《人员流动便利化议定书》方面做出了贡献,使其成为批准该议定书的国家之一,该议定书的规定更为宽松。 研究报告建议签订更具地区性的统一自由流动协定,并采取一种不以安全和负面看法为中心的人员自由流动方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信