An assessment of the relationship between body mass index and minor complications in percutaneous gastrostomy tubes

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sean Lee, Abheek Ghosh, Aislynn Raymond, Nabeel M. Akhter
{"title":"An assessment of the relationship between body mass index and minor complications in percutaneous gastrostomy tubes","authors":"Sean Lee, Abheek Ghosh, Aislynn Raymond, Nabeel M. Akhter","doi":"10.25259/jcis_62_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe aim of our study was to determine if patients with obesity have different postoperative outcomes than their peers.\n\n\n\nA single-center retrospective review of all fluoroscopically-guided percutaneous gastrostomy tube, with 183 patients and 90 patients in the BAG and dilator groups, respectively. Patients were stratified, based on body mass index (BMI) percentile and for age. Demographic information and data on medical comorbidities and post-operative complications were collected. All analyses were conducted using Chi-square or Kruskal–Wallis testing.\n\n\n\nThe median BMI was 26.6 kg/m2 with a standard deviation of 7.7. 106 (38.8%) patients were classified in the normal BMI category, 57 (20.9%) were overweight, and 50 (28.3%) were classified as obese. No major complications were reported in either group. 106 patients (38.8%) reported minor complications. The most common complication observed across both groups was procedural pain, with a higher incidence in the balloon group compared to the dilator group (17.5% vs. 12.2%). Dislodgement emerged as the second most common complication, occurring more frequently in the balloon group (12%) compared to the dilator group (6.7%). When considering weight categories, the overall rate of minor complications was highest among underweight patients (57.6%, P = 0.124). Both underweight and normal BMI patients showed a significantly higher incidence of tube dislodgement compared to other BMI categories (27.2% and 9.4%, respectively, P = 0.015). In a multivariable logistic regression, age was associated with an increased risk of minor complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, F [1.01, 1.05], P = 0.002). BAG had a greater OR for minor complication rate compared to dilator-assisted gastrostomy, although the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval [0.69, 2.06]).\n\n\n\nFew studies have identified the relationship between BMI and complications related to gastrostomy tube placement. Our study highlights the importance of individualized care for patients across different BMI classes to minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jcis_62_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine if patients with obesity have different postoperative outcomes than their peers. A single-center retrospective review of all fluoroscopically-guided percutaneous gastrostomy tube, with 183 patients and 90 patients in the BAG and dilator groups, respectively. Patients were stratified, based on body mass index (BMI) percentile and for age. Demographic information and data on medical comorbidities and post-operative complications were collected. All analyses were conducted using Chi-square or Kruskal–Wallis testing. The median BMI was 26.6 kg/m2 with a standard deviation of 7.7. 106 (38.8%) patients were classified in the normal BMI category, 57 (20.9%) were overweight, and 50 (28.3%) were classified as obese. No major complications were reported in either group. 106 patients (38.8%) reported minor complications. The most common complication observed across both groups was procedural pain, with a higher incidence in the balloon group compared to the dilator group (17.5% vs. 12.2%). Dislodgement emerged as the second most common complication, occurring more frequently in the balloon group (12%) compared to the dilator group (6.7%). When considering weight categories, the overall rate of minor complications was highest among underweight patients (57.6%, P = 0.124). Both underweight and normal BMI patients showed a significantly higher incidence of tube dislodgement compared to other BMI categories (27.2% and 9.4%, respectively, P = 0.015). In a multivariable logistic regression, age was associated with an increased risk of minor complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, F [1.01, 1.05], P = 0.002). BAG had a greater OR for minor complication rate compared to dilator-assisted gastrostomy, although the difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval [0.69, 2.06]). Few studies have identified the relationship between BMI and complications related to gastrostomy tube placement. Our study highlights the importance of individualized care for patients across different BMI classes to minimize complications and improve patient outcomes.
评估体重指数与经皮胃造瘘管轻微并发症之间的关系
我们的研究旨在确定肥胖症患者的术后结果是否与同龄人不同。这是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象是所有透视引导经皮胃造口术置管患者,其中 BAG 组和扩张器组分别有 183 名和 90 名患者。根据体重指数(BMI)百分位数和年龄对患者进行了分层。此外,还收集了人口统计学信息、合并症和术后并发症数据。所有分析均采用Chi-square或Kruskal-Wallis检验。106例(38.8%)患者的体重指数属于正常,57例(20.9%)超重,50例(28.3%)肥胖。两组患者均未出现重大并发症。106名患者(38.8%)报告了轻微并发症。两组中最常见的并发症都是手术疼痛,球囊组的发生率高于扩张器组(17.5% 对 12.2%)。脱落是第二大常见并发症,球囊组(12%)的发生率高于扩张器组(6.7%)。考虑到体重类别,体重不足患者的轻微并发症总发生率最高(57.6%,P = 0.124)。与其他体重指数类别的患者相比,体重不足和体重指数正常的患者输液管脱落的发生率明显更高(分别为 27.2% 和 9.4%,P = 0.015)。在多变量逻辑回归中,年龄与轻微并发症风险的增加有关(几率比 [OR] 1.03,F [1.01, 1.05],P = 0.002)。与扩张器辅助胃造瘘术相比,BAG 的轻微并发症发生率较高,但差异无统计学意义(OR 1.19,95% 置信区间 [0.69,2.06])。我们的研究强调了为不同 BMI 等级的患者提供个体化护理的重要性,以最大限度地减少并发症并改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信