Not all child-to-parent violence is the same: A person-based analysis using the function of aggression

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Travis Harries, Ashlee Curtis, David Skvarc, Michelle Benstead, Arlene Walker, Richelle Mayshak
{"title":"Not all child-to-parent violence is the same: A person-based analysis using the function of aggression","authors":"Travis Harries,&nbsp;Ashlee Curtis,&nbsp;David Skvarc,&nbsp;Michelle Benstead,&nbsp;Arlene Walker,&nbsp;Richelle Mayshak","doi":"10.1111/fare.12991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore a typology of dyads experiencing child-to-parent violence (CPV) using the function of CPV (i.e., its motivation).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>CPV may be motivated by reactive (i.e., retaliatory), proactive (i.e., instrumental), or affective (i.e., primarily emotional) functions, which may co-occur intraindividually; however, their co-occurrence pattern is not fully understood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 252 participants aged 27 to 78 years (<i>M</i> = 45.92, <i>SD</i> = 8.33; 96% female) who were caregivers of a young person aged 5 to 24 years (<i>M</i> = 13.18, <i>SD</i> = 4.86) and completed an online survey measuring the form and function of CPV and a range of child, parent, and dyadic factors. The majority of dyads were mother–child.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Latent profile analysis revealed two distinct types of dyads: <i>High-proactive</i> dyads reported severe, highly reactive and proactive CPV compared with <i>low-proactive</i> dyads in which proactive CPV was rare and reactive CPV was uncommon. Rates of affective CPV were similar across types. Analysis of variance demonstrated that high- and low-proactive dyads significantly differed across intervention-relevant parent, child, and dyadic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>High-proactive dyads exhibited role reversal and spousification (i.e., parental conflict spill-over) in which caregivers were helpless, frightened, and frightening, and the young person possessed domineering traits. Low-proactive dyads were characterized by a comparatively in-control caregiver who exhibited intrusiveness and higher supervision and a young person who was comparatively less domineering.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Different types of dyads experiencing CPV may have unique intervention needs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 3","pages":"1968-1988"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.12991","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore a typology of dyads experiencing child-to-parent violence (CPV) using the function of CPV (i.e., its motivation).

Background

CPV may be motivated by reactive (i.e., retaliatory), proactive (i.e., instrumental), or affective (i.e., primarily emotional) functions, which may co-occur intraindividually; however, their co-occurrence pattern is not fully understood.

Method

This study included 252 participants aged 27 to 78 years (M = 45.92, SD = 8.33; 96% female) who were caregivers of a young person aged 5 to 24 years (M = 13.18, SD = 4.86) and completed an online survey measuring the form and function of CPV and a range of child, parent, and dyadic factors. The majority of dyads were mother–child.

Results

Latent profile analysis revealed two distinct types of dyads: High-proactive dyads reported severe, highly reactive and proactive CPV compared with low-proactive dyads in which proactive CPV was rare and reactive CPV was uncommon. Rates of affective CPV were similar across types. Analysis of variance demonstrated that high- and low-proactive dyads significantly differed across intervention-relevant parent, child, and dyadic factors.

Conclusion

High-proactive dyads exhibited role reversal and spousification (i.e., parental conflict spill-over) in which caregivers were helpless, frightened, and frightening, and the young person possessed domineering traits. Low-proactive dyads were characterized by a comparatively in-control caregiver who exhibited intrusiveness and higher supervision and a young person who was comparatively less domineering.

Implications

Different types of dyads experiencing CPV may have unique intervention needs.

Abstract Image

并非所有儿童对父母的暴力行为都是一样的:利用攻击功能进行基于人的分析
本研究包括 252 名年龄在 27 岁至 78 岁之间的参与者(中位数 = 45.92,标 准差 = 8.33)、本研究包括 252 名年龄在 27 至 78 岁之间的参与者(中位数 = 45.92,标准差 = 8.33;96% 为女性),他们都是 5 至 24 岁青少年(中位数 = 13.18,标准差 = 4.86)的照顾者,并完成了一项在线调查,测量 CPV 的形式和功能,以及一系列儿童、父母和双亲因素。潜在特征分析显示出两种不同类型的组合:高主动性组合报告了严重、高反应性和主动性 CPV,而低主动性组合则很少报告主动性 CPV,反应性 CPV 也不常见。不同类型的情感 CPV 发生率相似。方差分析显示,高主动性和低主动性组合在与干预相关的父母、儿童和组合因素方面存在显著差异。高主动性组合表现出角色逆转和配偶化(即父母冲突外溢),在这种情况下,照顾者感到无助、恐惧和害怕,而年轻人则具有专横跋扈的特质。低主动性组合的特点是照顾者相对处于控制状态,表现出侵入性和较高的监督性,而年轻人则相对不那么专横。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信