A narrative journey into the borderland of patient safety: Toward an expanded, relational concept of safety

Lisbeth Lauge Andersen
{"title":"A narrative journey into the borderland of patient safety: Toward an expanded, relational concept of safety","authors":"Lisbeth Lauge Andersen","doi":"10.4081/qrmh.2023.11496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Patient safety” is routinely defined in health services globally as “safety for patients against harm and risk of injury in health care.” (Danish Board of Quality in Health Care, 2022, p. 28; translated by the author). This is a standardized, broad, and general definition of what counts as safety. In this article, I argue for an expanded, relational concept of patient safety revolving around experienced patient safety. Recognizing safety as vital for all groups of patients, I follow a dialogical, critical-reflexive approach to focus on safety in a somatic hospital setting in Denmark as it is experienced by people with lived experience of mental distress. Safety in this context is often compromised, contributing to inequity in health for people with mental distress. I present and analyze the narratives of two experts by experience about their somatic hospital stay. As an analytical approach, I draw on Frank’s dialogical narrative analysis together with elements from Bakhtin’s theory of dialogue and Foucault’s theory of power/knowledge. Forefronting voices of those rarely asked and seldom heard, dialogical narrative analysis provides insight into how “patient safety” is enacted through situated negotiations of meaning in the narratives of people with lived experience. The storytellers are continuously struggling to fit in and to be seen as human beings, trying to resist public narratives on mental distress that threaten to limit their scope of action and who they can become. The discussion highlights how unintended emotional and psychosocial harm limit the benefits of patient safety for certain groups in society. In particular, shame, individualized responsibility, and internalized inferiority hinder equity in health. Building on my analysis, I suggest a collaborative, participatory approach for coproducing further knowledge through joint analysis with people with lived experience and nurses from somatic hospital wards.","PeriodicalId":375726,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","volume":" 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2023.11496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Patient safety” is routinely defined in health services globally as “safety for patients against harm and risk of injury in health care.” (Danish Board of Quality in Health Care, 2022, p. 28; translated by the author). This is a standardized, broad, and general definition of what counts as safety. In this article, I argue for an expanded, relational concept of patient safety revolving around experienced patient safety. Recognizing safety as vital for all groups of patients, I follow a dialogical, critical-reflexive approach to focus on safety in a somatic hospital setting in Denmark as it is experienced by people with lived experience of mental distress. Safety in this context is often compromised, contributing to inequity in health for people with mental distress. I present and analyze the narratives of two experts by experience about their somatic hospital stay. As an analytical approach, I draw on Frank’s dialogical narrative analysis together with elements from Bakhtin’s theory of dialogue and Foucault’s theory of power/knowledge. Forefronting voices of those rarely asked and seldom heard, dialogical narrative analysis provides insight into how “patient safety” is enacted through situated negotiations of meaning in the narratives of people with lived experience. The storytellers are continuously struggling to fit in and to be seen as human beings, trying to resist public narratives on mental distress that threaten to limit their scope of action and who they can become. The discussion highlights how unintended emotional and psychosocial harm limit the benefits of patient safety for certain groups in society. In particular, shame, individualized responsibility, and internalized inferiority hinder equity in health. Building on my analysis, I suggest a collaborative, participatory approach for coproducing further knowledge through joint analysis with people with lived experience and nurses from somatic hospital wards.
病人安全边界的叙事之旅:建立一个扩展的、关系性的安全概念
在全球医疗服务领域,"患者安全 "通常被定义为 "在医疗服务中保障患者安全,避免伤害和受伤风险"(丹麦医疗服务质量委员会,2022 年,第 28 页;笔者译)。(丹麦医疗质量委员会,2022 年,第 28 页;作者译)。这是一个关于安全的标准化、宽泛而笼统的定义。在本文中,我将围绕 "经验型患者安全 "来论证一个扩展的、关系型的患者安全概念。在认识到安全对所有患者群体都至关重要的同时,我采用了一种对话式、批判-反思式的方法,重点关注丹麦一家躯体医院环境中的安全问题,因为有精神痛苦生活经历的人都会有这样的体验。在这种情况下,安全往往受到损害,从而导致精神痛苦患者在健康方面的不平等。我介绍并分析了两位经验专家关于他们在躯体医院住院期间的叙述。作为一种分析方法,我借鉴了弗兰克的对话叙事分析法以及巴赫金的对话理论和福柯的权力/知识理论。对话式叙事分析法直面那些很少被问及、也很少被听到的声音,让我们深入了解 "患者安全 "是如何通过有生活经验的人的叙事中的情景意义协商来实现的。讲故事的人一直在努力融入社会并被视为人类,他们试图抵制公众对精神痛苦的叙述,因为这种叙述有可能限制他们的行动范围,限制他们成为什么样的人。讨论强调了意外的情感和社会心理伤害如何限制了患者安全对社会某些群体的益处。特别是,羞耻感、个人化的责任和内化的自卑感阻碍了健康方面的公平。在我的分析基础上,我提出了一种合作性、参与性的方法,通过与有生活经验的人和来自躯体医院病房的护士共同分析,共同创造进一步的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信