Teachers’ Perceptions of Integrating Tower Gardens into Pre-K4 Curriculum

Kaitlyn Sills, Alicia Stapp, Laurel Lambert, Kenya Wolff
{"title":"Teachers’ Perceptions of Integrating Tower Gardens into Pre-K4 Curriculum","authors":"Kaitlyn Sills, Alicia Stapp, Laurel Lambert, Kenya Wolff","doi":"10.21926/rpn.2401002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schools play an integral role in providing opportunities for children of all ages to be exposed to nutrition education. There are a variety of ways children can receive nutrition education in the school setting, such as explicit lessons, modeled dialogue, and exposure to nutrition-based principles. However, there continues to be a disconnect between teacher perceptions of nutrition education and time spent implementing it in the classroom. Nutrition education can come in many forms, including hands-on gardening and explicit discussions on the impact of food choices on overall health. Effective nutrition education in any form elicits numerous benefits for children, but there are a multitude of barriers that inhibit teachers from implementing hands-on gardening into their classrooms—such as time, space, and teacher self-efficacy. Tower Gardens, otherwise known as hydro- and aeroponic, vertical gardening systems, offer an alternative to the space and time required for traditional gardening. Nonetheless, the body of literature surrounding the impact and feasibility of implementing tower gardening systems is limited, specifically in the preschool setting. Therefore, this study explored teachers’ perceptions of and experiences with implementing Tower Gardens into pre-kindergarten 4-year-old (pre-K4) classrooms. A qualitative approach was employed wherein a focus group was conducted with pre-K-4 teachers who integrated Tower Gardens through the Growing Healthy Minds, Bodies, and Communities Curriculum. Findings were analyzed and four themes emerged as follows: (a) novelty of Tower Gardens increases opportunities to learn; (b) a multitude of interactions with growing and food; (c) increased engagement from children; and (d) implementation and positive outcomes for teachers. These findings suggest that Tower Gardens can be implemented with relative ease in the classroom and produce positive outcomes for student engagement and interactions with foods.","PeriodicalId":74647,"journal":{"name":"Recent progress in nutrition","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent progress in nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/rpn.2401002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schools play an integral role in providing opportunities for children of all ages to be exposed to nutrition education. There are a variety of ways children can receive nutrition education in the school setting, such as explicit lessons, modeled dialogue, and exposure to nutrition-based principles. However, there continues to be a disconnect between teacher perceptions of nutrition education and time spent implementing it in the classroom. Nutrition education can come in many forms, including hands-on gardening and explicit discussions on the impact of food choices on overall health. Effective nutrition education in any form elicits numerous benefits for children, but there are a multitude of barriers that inhibit teachers from implementing hands-on gardening into their classrooms—such as time, space, and teacher self-efficacy. Tower Gardens, otherwise known as hydro- and aeroponic, vertical gardening systems, offer an alternative to the space and time required for traditional gardening. Nonetheless, the body of literature surrounding the impact and feasibility of implementing tower gardening systems is limited, specifically in the preschool setting. Therefore, this study explored teachers’ perceptions of and experiences with implementing Tower Gardens into pre-kindergarten 4-year-old (pre-K4) classrooms. A qualitative approach was employed wherein a focus group was conducted with pre-K-4 teachers who integrated Tower Gardens through the Growing Healthy Minds, Bodies, and Communities Curriculum. Findings were analyzed and four themes emerged as follows: (a) novelty of Tower Gardens increases opportunities to learn; (b) a multitude of interactions with growing and food; (c) increased engagement from children; and (d) implementation and positive outcomes for teachers. These findings suggest that Tower Gardens can be implemented with relative ease in the classroom and produce positive outcomes for student engagement and interactions with foods.
教师对将塔园纳入学前班 4 年级课程的看法
学校在为各年龄段儿童提供营养教育机会方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。儿童可以通过多种方式在学校环境中接受营养教育,如明确的课程、示范对话和接触营养原则。然而,教师对营养教育的认识与在课堂上实施营养教育的时间之间仍然存在脱节。营养教育的形式多种多样,包括动手园艺和明确讨论食物选择对整体健康的影响。任何形式的有效营养教育都能为儿童带来诸多益处,但有许多障碍阻碍着教师在课堂上实施动手园艺,如时间、空间和教师的自我效能感。塔式花园,又称水耕和气耕垂直园艺系统,为传统园艺所需的空间和时间提供了另一种选择。然而,有关实施塔式园艺系统的影响和可行性的文献十分有限,特别是在学前教育环境中。因此,本研究探讨了教师对在学前班 4 岁(pre-K4)班级实施塔式园艺系统的看法和经验。本研究采用了定性方法,与通过 "健康心理、身体和社区成长课程 "整合塔式花园的学前班 4 岁以下教师进行了焦点小组讨论。对调查结果进行了分析,得出以下四个主题:(a) 塔式花园的新颖性增加了学习机会;(b) 与种植和食物的多种互动;(c) 提高了儿童的参与度;(d) 教师的实施和积极成果。这些研究结果表明,"塔式花园 "可以比较容易地在课堂上实施,并对学生的参与和与食物的互动产生积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信