An Analysis of Fixed-Bed Catalytic Reactors Performances for One-Stage Butadiene Synthesis from Ethanol

IF 3.8 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Catalysts Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.3390/catal14010083
A. Brosteanu, I. Banu, G. Bozga
{"title":"An Analysis of Fixed-Bed Catalytic Reactors Performances for One-Stage Butadiene Synthesis from Ethanol","authors":"A. Brosteanu, I. Banu, G. Bozga","doi":"10.3390/catal14010083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study assesses, using a theoretical approach, the performances of two widely used fixed-bed reactors for the ethanol-to-butadiene (ETB) one-stage (Lebedev) process: multibed adiabatic reactors (MBAR) with inter-bed heating and a multitubular reactor (MTR). The mathematical model consists of mass and heat conservation equations at catalyst particle and particle bed scales, coupled with a published kinetic model specific for a modified MgO–SiO2 catalyst. The process simulations at the level of catalyst particle have shown that the inter-phase concentration and temperature gradients are negligible, the only physical step with a limiting influence on process kinetics being the internal diffusion. A simplified version of the reactor model was also formulated, including empirical expressions developed in the study for the calculation of internal effectiveness factors. The reactor simulations highlighted that the MBAR with inter-bed heating by injection of hot reactants provides worse butadiene (BD) yields as a consequence of reduced reaction times (due to reactant by-pass of catalyst beds). The MBAR with inter-bed heating using heat exchangers provides better performances but inferior to those of MTR if the number of catalyst beds is less than six. A preliminary optimization study for the MBAR and MTR is also presented. The results showed that the maximization of BD yield has the drawback of a low BD production rate, whereas the maximization of BD production rate corresponds to a relatively low BD yield and high ethanol and inert recycles. A trade-off between the two extreme cases can be attained by maximizing the income generated by reactor operation.","PeriodicalId":9794,"journal":{"name":"Catalysts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysts","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study assesses, using a theoretical approach, the performances of two widely used fixed-bed reactors for the ethanol-to-butadiene (ETB) one-stage (Lebedev) process: multibed adiabatic reactors (MBAR) with inter-bed heating and a multitubular reactor (MTR). The mathematical model consists of mass and heat conservation equations at catalyst particle and particle bed scales, coupled with a published kinetic model specific for a modified MgO–SiO2 catalyst. The process simulations at the level of catalyst particle have shown that the inter-phase concentration and temperature gradients are negligible, the only physical step with a limiting influence on process kinetics being the internal diffusion. A simplified version of the reactor model was also formulated, including empirical expressions developed in the study for the calculation of internal effectiveness factors. The reactor simulations highlighted that the MBAR with inter-bed heating by injection of hot reactants provides worse butadiene (BD) yields as a consequence of reduced reaction times (due to reactant by-pass of catalyst beds). The MBAR with inter-bed heating using heat exchangers provides better performances but inferior to those of MTR if the number of catalyst beds is less than six. A preliminary optimization study for the MBAR and MTR is also presented. The results showed that the maximization of BD yield has the drawback of a low BD production rate, whereas the maximization of BD production rate corresponds to a relatively low BD yield and high ethanol and inert recycles. A trade-off between the two extreme cases can be attained by maximizing the income generated by reactor operation.
乙醇单级合成丁二烯的固定床催化反应器性能分析
本研究采用理论方法评估了乙醇制丁二烯 (ETB) 一阶段 (Lebedev) 工艺中两种广泛使用的固定床反应器的性能:带床间加热的多床绝热反应器 (MBAR) 和多管式反应器 (MTR)。数学模型包括催化剂颗粒和颗粒床层尺度上的质量和热量守恒方程,以及已发布的针对改良氧化镁-二氧化硅催化剂的动力学模型。催化剂颗粒级的工艺模拟表明,相间浓度和温度梯度可以忽略不计,对工艺动力学产生限制性影响的唯一物理步骤是内部扩散。还制定了一个简化版的反应器模型,包括在研究中开发的用于计算内部效 率系数的经验表达式。反应器模拟结果表明,通过注入热反应物进行床层间加热的 MBAR 反应器由于反应时间缩短(由于反应物通过催化剂床层),丁二烯(BD)产量降低。使用热交换器进行床间加热的 MBAR 性能更好,但如果催化剂床的数量少于 6 个,则不如 MTR。此外,还对 MBAR 和 MTR 进行了初步优化研究。结果表明,BD 产率最大化的缺点是 BD 产率较低,而 BD 产率最大化对应的是相对较低的 BD 产率以及较高的乙醇和惰性回收率。通过使反应器运行产生的收入最大化,可以在两种极端情况之间进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catalysts
Catalysts CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
1330
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Catalysts (ISSN 2073-4344) is an international open access journal of catalysts and catalyzed reactions. Catalysts publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信