Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling

Pei-Hsuan Lin, Yi-An Lee, Lu-Chun Wang
{"title":"Simplified segmental scleral buckling without localization and cryopexy: A retrospective comparison with conventional segmental scleral buckling","authors":"Pei-Hsuan Lin, Yi-An Lee, Lu-Chun Wang","doi":"10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aim of this study was to propose a simplified segmental scleral buckling (SSSB) technique that does not require break localization for less-experienced vitreoretinal surgeons.\n \n \n \n This retrospective study compared the clinical results of 46 conventional and 23 SSSB (conventional segmental SB [CSSB] and SSSB, respectively) procedures in a tertiary referral retinal center in Taiwan between 2008 and 2019. In the CSSB group, breaks were localized during surgery. In the SSSB group, a wider sponge band and a longer scleral buckle were used to maximize the chances of sealing the retinal breaks based on the preoperative fundus examination findings and to minimize the positioning error caused by cyclotorsion, without performing indirect ophthalmoscopy. The primary outcome was assessed after 6 months. Patient characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. The main outcomes were the duration of surgery, changes in visual acuity, primary success rate, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment recurrence rate, and the frequency of further laser photocoagulation.\n \n \n \n SSSB had a shorter duration than CSSB and was associated with more frequent use of longer and wider explants and need for further laser retinopexy. Both groups showed high primary success rates (95.65%).\n \n \n \n The primary success rates for the SSSB and CSSB groups were comparable and equally high. SSSB required laser retinopexy more frequently and was a shorter procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":508969,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"16 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo-d-23-00093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to propose a simplified segmental scleral buckling (SSSB) technique that does not require break localization for less-experienced vitreoretinal surgeons. This retrospective study compared the clinical results of 46 conventional and 23 SSSB (conventional segmental SB [CSSB] and SSSB, respectively) procedures in a tertiary referral retinal center in Taiwan between 2008 and 2019. In the CSSB group, breaks were localized during surgery. In the SSSB group, a wider sponge band and a longer scleral buckle were used to maximize the chances of sealing the retinal breaks based on the preoperative fundus examination findings and to minimize the positioning error caused by cyclotorsion, without performing indirect ophthalmoscopy. The primary outcome was assessed after 6 months. Patient characteristics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were compared between groups. The main outcomes were the duration of surgery, changes in visual acuity, primary success rate, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment recurrence rate, and the frequency of further laser photocoagulation. SSSB had a shorter duration than CSSB and was associated with more frequent use of longer and wider explants and need for further laser retinopexy. Both groups showed high primary success rates (95.65%). The primary success rates for the SSSB and CSSB groups were comparable and equally high. SSSB required laser retinopexy more frequently and was a shorter procedure.
无需定位和冷冻的简化节段性巩膜扣锁术:与传统节段式巩膜扣锁术的回顾性比较
本研究旨在为经验不足的玻璃体视网膜外科医生提出一种无需断裂定位的简化节段式巩膜扣带(SSSB)技术。 这项回顾性研究比较了 2008 年至 2019 年期间在台湾一家三级转诊视网膜中心进行的 46 例常规 SSSB 和 23 例 SSSB(分别为常规节段式 SB [CSSB] 和 SSSB)手术的临床结果。在 CSSB 组中,断裂是在手术过程中定位的。在 SSSB 组中,根据术前眼底检查的结果,使用了更宽的海绵带和更长的巩膜扣,以最大限度地密封视网膜破损处,并在不进行间接眼底镜检查的情况下,最大限度地减少因眼球回转造成的定位误差。主要结果在 6 个月后进行评估。两组患者的特征、手术参数和结果进行了比较。主要结果包括手术持续时间、视力变化、主要成功率、流变性视网膜脱离复发率以及进一步激光光凝的频率。 与 CSSB 相比,SSSB 的持续时间更短,而且更频繁地使用更长、更宽的剥离物,并需要进一步进行激光视网膜整形术。两组的初次成功率都很高(95.65%)。 SSSB 组和 CSSB 组的初次成功率相当,也同样高。SSSB 需要激光视网膜整形的次数更多,手术时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信