Teacher Exit and Educational Opportunity: Lessons From Career and Technical Education

IF 5.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hannah Kistler, Shaun M. Dougherty, S. C. Woods
{"title":"Teacher Exit and Educational Opportunity: Lessons From Career and Technical Education","authors":"Hannah Kistler, Shaun M. Dougherty, S. C. Woods","doi":"10.3102/0013189x231223132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ensuring a stable pool of teachers is critical to building a pipeline of future workers, especially in career and technical education (CTE), where programming can lead to immediate post-school employment or postsecondary enrollment. We use longitudinal state data with unemployment insurance records to document workforce dynamics among CTE teachers. We find that teachers in hard-to-staff CTE areas are more likely to leave teaching and are difficult to replace, creating net reductions in the number of students who can be served. We demonstrate that teachers with the greatest likelihood of leaving are also those who earn the most money in their post-teaching employment, suggesting actionable dimensions for policies to help retain or recruit teachers in these areas. Ensuring a steady and stable pool of high-quality teachers is critical to building a pipeline of future workers and professionals to support economic stability, especially in growing and high-wage fields. This is particularly true in career and technical education (CTE) where programming in high school can lead to immediate postschool employment or enrollment in aligned postsecondary programs. Increased policy focus on CTE has expanded program offerings over the last 15 years, and new federal requirements that programs align with in-demand occupations and industries have heightened potential tensions between the private and public employment opportunities for current or potential CTE teachers (Perkins V, 2018). Even before the new federal mandate, CTE teachers were a hard-to-staff group, with school administrators citing higher turnover and difficulty hiring (Hensley et al., 2017). Though the quantitative research on CTE teachers is limited, evidence does suggest that teachers who score higher on content-specific certification exams produce graduates who earn more money in their early years of post–high school employment, bolstering the claim that these teachers are important (Chen et al., 2023).","PeriodicalId":11404,"journal":{"name":"Educational Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x231223132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring a stable pool of teachers is critical to building a pipeline of future workers, especially in career and technical education (CTE), where programming can lead to immediate post-school employment or postsecondary enrollment. We use longitudinal state data with unemployment insurance records to document workforce dynamics among CTE teachers. We find that teachers in hard-to-staff CTE areas are more likely to leave teaching and are difficult to replace, creating net reductions in the number of students who can be served. We demonstrate that teachers with the greatest likelihood of leaving are also those who earn the most money in their post-teaching employment, suggesting actionable dimensions for policies to help retain or recruit teachers in these areas. Ensuring a steady and stable pool of high-quality teachers is critical to building a pipeline of future workers and professionals to support economic stability, especially in growing and high-wage fields. This is particularly true in career and technical education (CTE) where programming in high school can lead to immediate postschool employment or enrollment in aligned postsecondary programs. Increased policy focus on CTE has expanded program offerings over the last 15 years, and new federal requirements that programs align with in-demand occupations and industries have heightened potential tensions between the private and public employment opportunities for current or potential CTE teachers (Perkins V, 2018). Even before the new federal mandate, CTE teachers were a hard-to-staff group, with school administrators citing higher turnover and difficulty hiring (Hensley et al., 2017). Though the quantitative research on CTE teachers is limited, evidence does suggest that teachers who score higher on content-specific certification exams produce graduates who earn more money in their early years of post–high school employment, bolstering the claim that these teachers are important (Chen et al., 2023).
教师离职与教育机会:职业技术教育的启示
确保稳定的师资队伍对于建立未来工人的输送管道至关重要,尤其是在职业技术教育(CTE)领域,因为在该领域,教师的课程设置可直接导致学生毕业后的就业或中学后的入学。我们利用各州的纵向数据和失业保险记录来记录职业技术教育教师队伍的动态变化。我们发现,在人手短缺的 CTE 领域,教师更有可能离开教学岗位,而且很难被替代,从而导致可服务的学生人数出现净减少。我们证明,最有可能离职的教师也是那些离职后收入最高的教师,这为帮助这些领域留住或招聘教师的政策提出了可操作的层面。确保高质量教师队伍的稳定,对于建立未来工人和专业人员的输送管道以支持经济稳定至关重要,尤其是在不断增长的高薪领域。这一点在职业技术教育(CTE)中尤为突出,因为高中阶段的课程设置可以帮助学生在毕业后立即就业或进入与之相匹配的中学后课程学习。在过去的 15 年中,对职业技术教育的政策关注不断增加,扩大了课程设置,而联邦关于课程必须与紧缺职业和行业相一致的新要求,加剧了当前或潜在的职业技术教育教师的私人和公共就业机会之间的潜在紧张关系(Perkins V,2018 年)。即使在新的联邦要求出台之前,CTE 教师也是一个很难招到人的群体,学校管理者称其流动率较高且招聘困难(Hensley 等人,2017 年)。虽然对 CTE 教师的定量研究有限,但有证据表明,在特定内容的认证考试中得分较高的教师,其毕业生在高中毕业后就业的最初几年收入较高,这也支持了这些教师很重要的说法(Chen 等人,2023 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Researcher
Educational Researcher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Educational Researcher publishes scholarly articles with broad significance to the education research community, spanning various areas within education research and related disciplines. The journal aims to disseminate major programmatic research and new findings of wide importance. It is issued nine times annually and welcomes submissions of feature articles, reviews/essays, briefs, and technical comments. Additionally, the journal publishes commentary articles categorized as policy forum, letters, and books, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信