Analysis of The Acceptance Level Of Digital Wallet Users in Digitally Parking Payment Using The Technology Acceptance Model Approach

Ansir Launtu, Hotma Mentalita, Arifai Ilyas, M. Munizu, Stiem Bongaya Makassar
{"title":"Analysis of The Acceptance Level Of Digital Wallet Users in Digitally Parking Payment Using The Technology Acceptance Model Approach","authors":"Ansir Launtu, Hotma Mentalita, Arifai Ilyas, M. Munizu, Stiem Bongaya Makassar","doi":"10.60083/jidt.v6i1.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify the factors that affect users' acceptability of using an e-wallet to pay for parking. We used a cross-sectional quantitative approach to carry out this study. We distributed questionnaires and conducted surveys to gather data. This study's population includes anybody who pays with a mobile wallet and utilizes parking services. One hundred people made up the study's sample. Using SmartPLS, we performed statistical data analysis that involved hypothesis testing, inner and outer model analysis, and examination of the data. It's evident from the hypothesis results that using e-wallets to pay for parking makes consumers feel more productive. Users' perception of the usefulness of utilizing e-wallets to pay for parking is indicated by their approval of the PU3 indication. However, because security rejects their goal of using e-wallets, users do not feel secure when using them. Perceived utility and subjective norms are the main determinants of e-wallet acceptance as a payment method; design comes in second. The hypothesis that most influences this research is the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, with perceived ease of use being influenced by design.","PeriodicalId":507682,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v6i1.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors that affect users' acceptability of using an e-wallet to pay for parking. We used a cross-sectional quantitative approach to carry out this study. We distributed questionnaires and conducted surveys to gather data. This study's population includes anybody who pays with a mobile wallet and utilizes parking services. One hundred people made up the study's sample. Using SmartPLS, we performed statistical data analysis that involved hypothesis testing, inner and outer model analysis, and examination of the data. It's evident from the hypothesis results that using e-wallets to pay for parking makes consumers feel more productive. Users' perception of the usefulness of utilizing e-wallets to pay for parking is indicated by their approval of the PU3 indication. However, because security rejects their goal of using e-wallets, users do not feel secure when using them. Perceived utility and subjective norms are the main determinants of e-wallet acceptance as a payment method; design comes in second. The hypothesis that most influences this research is the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, with perceived ease of use being influenced by design.
利用技术接受模型法分析数字钱包用户对数字停车收费的接受程度
本研究旨在找出影响用户接受使用电子钱包支付停车费的因素。我们采用了横截面定量研究方法。我们通过发放问卷和进行调查来收集数据。本研究的研究对象包括所有使用手机钱包付费并使用停车服务的人。100 人构成了本研究的样本。我们使用 SmartPLS 进行了数据统计分析,包括假设检验、内外模型分析和数据检查。从假设结果可以看出,使用电子钱包支付停车费让消费者感觉更有成效。用户对使用电子钱包支付停车费的实用性的看法体现在他们对 PU3 指标的认可上。然而,由于安全问题拒绝了他们使用电子钱包的目标,用户在使用电子钱包时没有安全感。感知效用和主观规范是决定用户是否接受电子钱包这种支付方式的主要因素,而设计则排在第二位。对本研究影响最大的假设是感知易用性和感知有用性之间的关系,其中感知易用性受到设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信