Structure-preserving algorithms for guiding center dynamics based on the slow manifold of classical Pauli particle

Ruohan Zhang, Zhengxiong Wang, Jianyuan Xiao, Feng Wang
{"title":"Structure-preserving algorithms for guiding center dynamics based on the slow manifold of classical Pauli particle","authors":"Ruohan Zhang, Zhengxiong Wang, Jianyuan Xiao, Feng Wang","doi":"10.1088/2058-6272/ad225b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Classical Pauli particle (CPP) serves as a slow manifold, substituting the conventional guiding center dynamics. Based on the CPP, we utilize averaged vector field (AVF) method in the computations of drift orbits. Demonstrating significantly higher efficiency, this advanced method is capable of accomplishing the simulation in less than one-third time of directly computing the guiding center motion. In contrast to the CPP-based Boris algorithm, this approach inherits the advantages of the AVF method, yielding stable trajectories even achieved with a tenfold time step and reducing energy error with two orders of magnitude. By comparing these two CPP algorithms with the traditional RK4 method, numerical results indicate the remarkable performance in terms of both computational efficiency and error elimination. Moreover, we verify the properties of slow manifold integrators and successfully observe the bounce on both sides of the limiting slow manifold with initial conditions chosen off. To evaluate the practical value of the methods, we conduct simulations in non-axisymmetric perturbation magnetic fields as part of the experiments, demonstrating our CPP-based AVF method can handle simulations under complex magnetic field configurations with high accuracy, which the CPP-based Boris algorithm lacks. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate CPP can replace guiding center dynamics in using energy-preserving algorithms for computations, providing a new, efficient, as well as stable approach for applying structure-preserving algorithms in plasma simulations.","PeriodicalId":506986,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Science and Technology","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-6272/ad225b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical Pauli particle (CPP) serves as a slow manifold, substituting the conventional guiding center dynamics. Based on the CPP, we utilize averaged vector field (AVF) method in the computations of drift orbits. Demonstrating significantly higher efficiency, this advanced method is capable of accomplishing the simulation in less than one-third time of directly computing the guiding center motion. In contrast to the CPP-based Boris algorithm, this approach inherits the advantages of the AVF method, yielding stable trajectories even achieved with a tenfold time step and reducing energy error with two orders of magnitude. By comparing these two CPP algorithms with the traditional RK4 method, numerical results indicate the remarkable performance in terms of both computational efficiency and error elimination. Moreover, we verify the properties of slow manifold integrators and successfully observe the bounce on both sides of the limiting slow manifold with initial conditions chosen off. To evaluate the practical value of the methods, we conduct simulations in non-axisymmetric perturbation magnetic fields as part of the experiments, demonstrating our CPP-based AVF method can handle simulations under complex magnetic field configurations with high accuracy, which the CPP-based Boris algorithm lacks. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate CPP can replace guiding center dynamics in using energy-preserving algorithms for computations, providing a new, efficient, as well as stable approach for applying structure-preserving algorithms in plasma simulations.
基于经典保利粒子慢流形的引导中心动力学结构保持算法
经典保利粒子(CPP)作为慢流形,替代了传统的指导中心动力学。在 CPP 的基础上,我们利用平均矢量场(AVF)方法计算漂移轨道。这种先进的方法大大提高了效率,只需不到直接计算制导中心运动三分之一的时间就能完成模拟。与基于 CPP 的 Boris 算法相比,这种方法继承了 AVF 方法的优点,即使在时间步长为十倍的情况下也能获得稳定的轨迹,并将能量误差减少了两个数量级。通过将这两种 CPP 算法与传统的 RK4 方法进行比较,数值结果表明,这两种算法在计算效率和误差消除方面都有显著的表现。此外,我们还验证了慢流形积分器的特性,并在初始条件选择偏离的情况下成功观测到了极限慢流形两侧的反弹。为了评估这些方法的实用价值,我们在实验中进行了非轴对称扰动磁场的模拟,证明基于 CPP 的 AVF 方法可以高精度地处理复杂磁场配置下的模拟,而基于 CPP 的 Boris 算法则缺乏这一点。通过数值实验,我们证明了 CPP 可以在使用能量保留算法进行计算时取代指导中心动力学,为等离子体模拟中结构保留算法的应用提供了一种高效、稳定的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信