Floodplain mapping of an ungauged river: A case study on Seti River in Pokhara, Nepal

K. Basnet, Deepak Acharya, Krishna Prasad Bhandari, Suraj Lamichhane, B. B. Sadadev
{"title":"Floodplain mapping of an ungauged river: A case study on Seti River in Pokhara, Nepal","authors":"K. Basnet, Deepak Acharya, Krishna Prasad Bhandari, Suraj Lamichhane, B. B. Sadadev","doi":"10.3126/hijase.v4i2.62185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlements and infrastructures along the banks of Seti River in Pokhara, Nepal are at high risk of flood. Floodplain mapping for ungauged Seti River is not straightforward like the one for gauged rivers. Main goal of this study was to prepare floodplain maps along the ungauged Seti River in Pokhara, as a case study, using one-dimensional HEC-RAS model. First, catchment area ratio (CAR) method was applied to find annual flow in ungauged Seti River based on flow data of gauged Mardi station. Once the annual maximum flow was estimated for sufficient time length (i.e., 42 years), peak flood was predicted using Gumbel method for various reaches of Seti River within Pokhara. Thus, estimated peak floods were also compared with the peak floods predicted using Gumbel method based on the annual flow data of Tanahu station. As the specific discharge observed to be comparable with each other (difference ≤ 2.68%), CAR method found be a reliable one that is useful for ungauged river. Then, Cowan’s approach was applied to estimate Manning’s roughness coefficient (n) and used it for calibration of HEC-RAS model. Cowan approach found to be a best alternative for ungauged river as the comparison of modelled flow depth with measured flow depth yielded only 3.82% difference. Finally, 1D hydraulic modelling was performed using calibrated HEC-RAS model with available 12.5 m resolution DEM terrain data. Floodplain maps were prepared based on the HEC-RAS simulation results coupled with Google Earth map. The flood inundation area within Pokhara was found to be 2.76, 3.05, and 3.59 Km2 for the peak flood of 20, 50, and 100 years return periods, respectively. Moreover, Laltin Bazar and Gaighat areas were identified to be at high risk of flood such that these areas found to be inundated with 20 or greater years return period floods, compared to Ramghat area which was observed to be flooded with the peak flood of 50 or more years return period. Floodplain maps of this study could be used for preparing flood hazard maps, planning infrastructures, and flood management.","PeriodicalId":122917,"journal":{"name":"Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering","volume":"52 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/hijase.v4i2.62185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Settlements and infrastructures along the banks of Seti River in Pokhara, Nepal are at high risk of flood. Floodplain mapping for ungauged Seti River is not straightforward like the one for gauged rivers. Main goal of this study was to prepare floodplain maps along the ungauged Seti River in Pokhara, as a case study, using one-dimensional HEC-RAS model. First, catchment area ratio (CAR) method was applied to find annual flow in ungauged Seti River based on flow data of gauged Mardi station. Once the annual maximum flow was estimated for sufficient time length (i.e., 42 years), peak flood was predicted using Gumbel method for various reaches of Seti River within Pokhara. Thus, estimated peak floods were also compared with the peak floods predicted using Gumbel method based on the annual flow data of Tanahu station. As the specific discharge observed to be comparable with each other (difference ≤ 2.68%), CAR method found be a reliable one that is useful for ungauged river. Then, Cowan’s approach was applied to estimate Manning’s roughness coefficient (n) and used it for calibration of HEC-RAS model. Cowan approach found to be a best alternative for ungauged river as the comparison of modelled flow depth with measured flow depth yielded only 3.82% difference. Finally, 1D hydraulic modelling was performed using calibrated HEC-RAS model with available 12.5 m resolution DEM terrain data. Floodplain maps were prepared based on the HEC-RAS simulation results coupled with Google Earth map. The flood inundation area within Pokhara was found to be 2.76, 3.05, and 3.59 Km2 for the peak flood of 20, 50, and 100 years return periods, respectively. Moreover, Laltin Bazar and Gaighat areas were identified to be at high risk of flood such that these areas found to be inundated with 20 or greater years return period floods, compared to Ramghat area which was observed to be flooded with the peak flood of 50 or more years return period. Floodplain maps of this study could be used for preparing flood hazard maps, planning infrastructures, and flood management.
绘制无测站河流的洪泛区地图:尼泊尔博卡拉塞蒂河案例研究
尼泊尔博卡拉塞蒂河沿岸的居民点和基础设施面临着很高的洪水风险。绘制未经测量的塞蒂河洪泛区地图与绘制经过测量的河流洪泛区地图不同。本研究的主要目标是使用一维 HEC-RAS 模型绘制博卡拉无测站塞蒂河沿岸的洪泛区地图。首先,根据测量的马尔迪站的流量数据,采用集水面积比(CAR)方法计算未测量的塞蒂河的年流量。在估算出足够长的年最大流量(即 42 年)后,采用 Gumbel 方法预测了博卡拉境内塞蒂河各河段的洪峰流量。因此,还将估算的洪峰流量与根据塔纳湖站的年流量数据使用 Gumbel 方法预测的洪峰流量进行了比较。由于观察到两者的具体排水量相当(差值小于 2.68%),CAR 方法被认为是一种可靠的方法,适用于无测站的河流。然后,采用 Cowan 方法估算曼宁粗糙度系数 (n),并将其用于校准 HEC-RAS 模型。考恩方法被认为是非测量河流的最佳选择,因为模拟水流深度与测量水流深度的比较结果仅有 3.82% 的差异。最后,利用校准过的 HEC-RAS 模型和可用的 12.5 米分辨率 DEM 地形数据进行了一维水力建模。根据 HEC-RAS 模拟结果和谷歌地球地图绘制了洪泛区地图。在 20 年、50 年和 100 年重现期的洪峰中,博卡拉的洪水淹没面积分别为 2.76、3.05 和 3.59 平方公里。此外,拉尔廷-巴扎尔(Laltin Bazar)和盖加特(Gaighat)地区被确定为洪水高危地区,这些地区被 20 年或更高重现期的洪水淹没,而拉姆加特(Ramghat)地区则被 50 年或更高重现期的洪峰淹没。这项研究绘制的洪泛区地图可用于绘制洪水灾害图、规划基础设施和洪水管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信