Eğitim Siyasasının Yapılandırılması Formülasyonunda Karar Verme (Decision-Making) Modelleri

Erdoğan Ergin
{"title":"Eğitim Siyasasının Yapılandırılması Formülasyonunda Karar Verme (Decision-Making) Modelleri","authors":"Erdoğan Ergin","doi":"10.52096/usbd.8.33.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The decision-making process in education policy making begins with the raising of an education-related problem, which is often the first step towards the legislative process. In this regard, the decision-making process focuses on how the proposals included in the policy agenda will be implemented and with what strategies they can be implemented. Again, qualified information obtained from the policy analysis department can directly affect decision-making mechanisms. However, it is decided by adding cultural, social, economic and other dynamics of society in order to decide on the policy alternative that will be included in the policy agenda. There are basically several different approaches and models for the realization of the decision-making function. The first of these is the rational model, the other is the Deconstructive model, and finally the mixed models that provide a compromise between these two. As a result of the formulation phase in the education policy process within this framework, a set of laws or rules may not always be formed. In some cases, legislators and decision makers may not consider the formulated considerations appropriate. Any formulated issue can be delayed by spreading over time and can be suspended due to different situations. Therefore, the solutions formulated for the solution of any problem do not mean that the problem has been completely solved. In some cases, the general managerial will may not consider problems that are formulated very effectively appropriate for different and dysfunctional reasons. This is an indication that even if the problem is very important and is very important by different groups, it may fall off the agenda over time. Key Words: Education Policy, Structuring Formulation, Decision-Making Models","PeriodicalId":506660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"69 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The decision-making process in education policy making begins with the raising of an education-related problem, which is often the first step towards the legislative process. In this regard, the decision-making process focuses on how the proposals included in the policy agenda will be implemented and with what strategies they can be implemented. Again, qualified information obtained from the policy analysis department can directly affect decision-making mechanisms. However, it is decided by adding cultural, social, economic and other dynamics of society in order to decide on the policy alternative that will be included in the policy agenda. There are basically several different approaches and models for the realization of the decision-making function. The first of these is the rational model, the other is the Deconstructive model, and finally the mixed models that provide a compromise between these two. As a result of the formulation phase in the education policy process within this framework, a set of laws or rules may not always be formed. In some cases, legislators and decision makers may not consider the formulated considerations appropriate. Any formulated issue can be delayed by spreading over time and can be suspended due to different situations. Therefore, the solutions formulated for the solution of any problem do not mean that the problem has been completely solved. In some cases, the general managerial will may not consider problems that are formulated very effectively appropriate for different and dysfunctional reasons. This is an indication that even if the problem is very important and is very important by different groups, it may fall off the agenda over time. Key Words: Education Policy, Structuring Formulation, Decision-Making Models
制定教育政策的决策模式
摘要 教育政策制定的决策过程始于提出与教育有关的问题,这往往是立法过程的第一步。在这方面,决策过程的重点是如何实施列入政策议程的建议,以及实施这些建议的策略是什么。同样,从政策分析部门获得的合格信息可以直接影响决策机制。然而,在决策过程中,要加入文化、社会、经济和其他社会动态,以决定纳入政策议程的政策备选方案。实现决策功能基本上有几种不同的方法和模式。首先是理性模式,其次是解构模式,最后是在这两种模式之间进行折中的混合模式。在这一框架内,教育政策过程的制定阶段不一定能形成一套法律或规则。在某些情况下,立法者和决策者可能并不认为所制定的考虑因素是适当的。任何已制定的问题都可能因时间的推移而拖延,也可能因不同的情况而中止。因此,为解决任何问题而制定的解决方案并不意味着问题已经完全解决。在某些情况下,一般的管理意愿可能会因为不同和功能失调的原因而不认为所制定的问题非常有效合适。这表明,即使问题非常重要,而且不同群体都非常重视,但随着时间的推移,它可能会从议事日程上消失。关键字教育政策、结构化制定、决策模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信