The Selection of Weapon Systems in The A2/AD (Not Access/Area Denial) Strategy at Indonesia's Strategic Choke Points by Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.59141/jrssem.v3i6.615

Tri Yudha Ismanto, Fathurrohman Umar, Setyanggono Eko Lutvie, Udayana Agung, Prasetyo Hari, Midhio I Wayan, Yusgiantoro Purnomo

{"title":"The Selection of Weapon Systems in The A2/AD (Not Access/Area Denial) Strategy at Indonesia's Strategic Choke Points by Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method","authors":"Tri Yudha Ismanto, Fathurrohman Umar, Setyanggono Eko Lutvie, Udayana Agung, Prasetyo Hari, Midhio I Wayan, Yusgiantoro Purnomo","doi":"10.59141/jrssem.v3i6.615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article utilizes the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to decide how to choose an effective weapon system for the A2/AD (anti-access/area denial) strategy at the Sunda Strait, Indonesia's strategic choke point. The main discussion is limited to selecting the types of weapon systems considered effective in implementing A2/AD at Indonesia's strategic choke points. The next step is to decide which primary, secondary, and alternative criteria are the most important. Each of these will then be put together mathematically by measuring consistency using the Consistency Index (CI), the Consistency Ratio (CR), and the Consistency Hierarchy, which is the ranking as the result of the analysis. This method resulting in a weight for the navigation criteria of 66%, projection of 19%, and operability of 16%. Furthermore, in conclusion, the order of the best weapon systems is RBS15 MK4 with a weight of 66%, Brahmos II at 18%, and Neptune 360ST at 16%.","PeriodicalId":216734,"journal":{"name":"Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v3i6.615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article utilizes the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to decide how to choose an effective weapon system for the A2/AD (anti-access/area denial) strategy at the Sunda Strait, Indonesia's strategic choke point. The main discussion is limited to selecting the types of weapon systems considered effective in implementing A2/AD at Indonesia's strategic choke points. The next step is to decide which primary, secondary, and alternative criteria are the most important. Each of these will then be put together mathematically by measuring consistency using the Consistency Index (CI), the Consistency Ratio (CR), and the Consistency Hierarchy, which is the ranking as the result of the analysis. This method resulting in a weight for the navigation criteria of 66%, projection of 19%, and operability of 16%. Furthermore, in conclusion, the order of the best weapon systems is RBS15 MK4 with a weight of 66%, Brahmos II at 18%, and Neptune 360ST at 16%.

查看原文本刊更多论文

利用层次分析法（AHP）选择印尼战略咽喉地带 A2/AD（非进入/区域拒止）战略中的武器系统

本文利用层次分析法（AHP）来决定如何为印尼战略咽喉巽他海峡的 A2/AD（反介入/区域拒止）战略选择有效的武器系统。主要讨论仅限于选择在印尼战略咽喉实施 A2/AD 时被认为有效的武器系统类型。下一步是决定哪些主要标准、次要标准和备选标准最为重要。然后，通过使用一致性指数 (CI)、一致性比率 (CR) 和一致性层次结构（即分析结果的排序）来衡量一致性，以数学方法将每项标准组合在一起。通过这种方法，导航标准的权重为 66%，投影标准的权重为 19%，可操作性标准的权重为 16%。此外，总之，最佳武器系统的顺序是 RBS15 MK4（权重为 66%）、"布拉莫斯 II"（18%）和 "海王星 360ST"（16%）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management

自引率

0.00%

发文量