Facultative symbiont virulence determines horizontal transmission rate without host specificity in Dictyostelium discoideum social amoebas

IF 3.4 1区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Suegene Noh, Ron F. Peck, Emily R Larson, Rachel M. Covitz, Anna Chen, Prachee Roy, Marisa C. Hamilton, Robert A. Dettmann
{"title":"Facultative symbiont virulence determines horizontal transmission rate without host specificity in Dictyostelium discoideum social amoebas","authors":"Suegene Noh, Ron F. Peck, Emily R Larson, Rachel M. Covitz, Anna Chen, Prachee Roy, Marisa C. Hamilton, Robert A. Dettmann","doi":"10.1093/evlett/qrae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In facultative symbioses, only a fraction of hosts are associated with symbionts. Specific host and symbiont pairings may be the result of host–symbiont coevolution driven by reciprocal selection or priority effects pertaining to which potential symbiont is associated with a host first. Distinguishing between these possibilities is important for understanding the evolutionary forces that affect facultative symbioses. We used the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, and its symbiont, Paraburkholderia bonniea, to determine whether ongoing coevolution affects which host–symbiont strain pairs naturally cooccur within a facultative symbiosis. Relative to other Paraburkholderia, including another symbiont of D. discoideum, P. bonniea features a reduced genome size that indicates a significant history of coevolution with its host. We hypothesized that ongoing host–symbiont coevolution would lead to higher fitness for naturally cooccurring (native) host and symbiont pairings compared to novel pairings. We show for the first time that P. bonniea symbionts can horizontally transmit to new amoeba hosts when hosts aggregate together during the social stage of their life cycle. Here we find evidence for a virulence–transmission trade-off without host specificity. Although symbiont strains were significantly variable in virulence and horizontal transmission rate, hosts and symbionts responded similarly to associations in native and novel pairings. We go on to identify candidate virulence factors in the genomes of P. bonniea strains that may contribute to variation in virulence. We conclude that ongoing coevolution is unlikely for D. discoideum and P. bonniea. The system instead appears to represent a stable facultative symbiosis in which naturally cooccurring P. bonniea host and symbiont pairings are the result of priority effects.","PeriodicalId":48629,"journal":{"name":"Evolution Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In facultative symbioses, only a fraction of hosts are associated with symbionts. Specific host and symbiont pairings may be the result of host–symbiont coevolution driven by reciprocal selection or priority effects pertaining to which potential symbiont is associated with a host first. Distinguishing between these possibilities is important for understanding the evolutionary forces that affect facultative symbioses. We used the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum, and its symbiont, Paraburkholderia bonniea, to determine whether ongoing coevolution affects which host–symbiont strain pairs naturally cooccur within a facultative symbiosis. Relative to other Paraburkholderia, including another symbiont of D. discoideum, P. bonniea features a reduced genome size that indicates a significant history of coevolution with its host. We hypothesized that ongoing host–symbiont coevolution would lead to higher fitness for naturally cooccurring (native) host and symbiont pairings compared to novel pairings. We show for the first time that P. bonniea symbionts can horizontally transmit to new amoeba hosts when hosts aggregate together during the social stage of their life cycle. Here we find evidence for a virulence–transmission trade-off without host specificity. Although symbiont strains were significantly variable in virulence and horizontal transmission rate, hosts and symbionts responded similarly to associations in native and novel pairings. We go on to identify candidate virulence factors in the genomes of P. bonniea strains that may contribute to variation in virulence. We conclude that ongoing coevolution is unlikely for D. discoideum and P. bonniea. The system instead appears to represent a stable facultative symbiosis in which naturally cooccurring P. bonniea host and symbiont pairings are the result of priority effects.
兼性共生体的毒力决定了盘基变形虫社会变形虫中无宿主特异性的水平传播率
在兼性共生中,只有一小部分宿主与共生体有联系。特定的宿主与共生体配对可能是宿主与共生体共同进化的结果,其驱动力是互惠选择或优先效应,即哪个潜在的共生体首先与宿主结合。区分这些可能性对于理解影响面生共生的进化力量非常重要。我们利用社会阿米巴--盘基变形虫及其共生体--Paraburkholderia bonniea,来确定持续的共同进化是否会影响宿主-共生体菌株对在面共生中的自然共生。与其他副球孢子菌(包括盘状芽孢杆菌的另一种共生菌)相比,邦尼埃氏副球孢子菌的基因组大小较小,这表明它与宿主的共同进化史非常长。我们假设,宿主与共生体之间持续的共同进化将导致自然共生(原生)的宿主与共生体配对比新配对具有更高的适合度。我们首次发现,当寄主在其生命周期的社会阶段聚集在一起时,P. bonniea共生体可以水平传播给新的阿米巴寄主。在这里,我们发现了毒力-传播权衡的证据,而没有宿主特异性。虽然共生体菌株在毒力和水平传播率方面存在显著差异,但宿主和共生体对原生和新配对组合的反应相似。我们进而确定了 P. bonniea 菌株基因组中可能导致毒力变化的候选毒力因子。我们的结论是,D. Discoideum 和 P. bonniea 不可能持续共同进化。相反,该系统似乎代表了一种稳定的面共生关系,其中自然共生的 P. bonniea 宿主和共生体配对是优先效应的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution Letters
Evolution Letters EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution Letters publishes cutting-edge new research in all areas of Evolutionary Biology. Available exclusively online, and entirely open access, Evolution Letters consists of Letters - original pieces of research which form the bulk of papers - and Comments and Opinion - a forum for highlighting timely new research ideas for the evolutionary community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信