Chinese medicine practitioners’ consensus on traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic patterns, symptoms, and herbal formulas for COVID-19 survivors: A Delphi study
IF 1.9 4区 医学Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Jiayin Ruan , Shucheng Chen , Yuen Shan Ho , Vivian Taam Wong , Mei Yuk Lam , Hector Wing Hong Tsang , Ian Hoyin Cheng , Wing Fai Yeung
{"title":"Chinese medicine practitioners’ consensus on traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic patterns, symptoms, and herbal formulas for COVID-19 survivors: A Delphi study","authors":"Jiayin Ruan , Shucheng Chen , Yuen Shan Ho , Vivian Taam Wong , Mei Yuk Lam , Hector Wing Hong Tsang , Ian Hoyin Cheng , Wing Fai Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In April 2022, the “Guidance and recommendations on Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation during COVID-19 recovery stage (pilot version)” (the CM Rehabilitation Guidance) was formulated for Hong Kong COVID-19 survivors. However, no consensus regarding traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) diagnostic patterns, symptoms, and herbal formulas in the Guidance has been reached among Hong Kong Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs). Thus, this study aimed to establish a consensus among them as a guidance for practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A modified Delphi method was conducted from July 28 to September 14, 2022. Each survey gathered feedback by using a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data were used. The consensus was defined as ≥80 % level of agreement with interquartile range (IQR) ≤1.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 13 CMPs with clinical experience in managing COVID-19 survivors participated in the three-round Delphi survey. A final consensus was reached regarding the following: (1) the diagnostic pattern <em>qi deficiency of the lung and spleen</em> (median = 4; IQR = 0; level of agreement = 92.31 %) with six new suggested symptom items; (2) the diagnostic pattern <em>dual deficiency of qi and yin</em> (median = 4; IQR = 0.5; level of agreement = 100 %) with three new suggested symptom items; and (3) the suggested herbal formulas for these two diagnostic patterns after modification.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Through the three-round Delphi survey, we established a modified CM Rehabilitation Guidance for Hong Kong COVID-19 survivors. The modified Guidance based on the views of Hong Kong CMPs with frontline clinical experience in COVID-19 should be more applicable to current COVID-19 survivors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In April 2022, the “Guidance and recommendations on Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation during COVID-19 recovery stage (pilot version)” (the CM Rehabilitation Guidance) was formulated for Hong Kong COVID-19 survivors. However, no consensus regarding traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) diagnostic patterns, symptoms, and herbal formulas in the Guidance has been reached among Hong Kong Chinese medicine practitioners (CMPs). Thus, this study aimed to establish a consensus among them as a guidance for practice.
Methods
A modified Delphi method was conducted from July 28 to September 14, 2022. Each survey gathered feedback by using a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data were used. The consensus was defined as ≥80 % level of agreement with interquartile range (IQR) ≤1.
Results
A total of 13 CMPs with clinical experience in managing COVID-19 survivors participated in the three-round Delphi survey. A final consensus was reached regarding the following: (1) the diagnostic pattern qi deficiency of the lung and spleen (median = 4; IQR = 0; level of agreement = 92.31 %) with six new suggested symptom items; (2) the diagnostic pattern dual deficiency of qi and yin (median = 4; IQR = 0.5; level of agreement = 100 %) with three new suggested symptom items; and (3) the suggested herbal formulas for these two diagnostic patterns after modification.
Conclusions
Through the three-round Delphi survey, we established a modified CM Rehabilitation Guidance for Hong Kong COVID-19 survivors. The modified Guidance based on the views of Hong Kong CMPs with frontline clinical experience in COVID-19 should be more applicable to current COVID-19 survivors.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education.
EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians.
The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.