Analysing and evaluating environmental flows through hydrological methods in the regulated Indus River Basin

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1002/eco.2624
Kashif Mehmood, Bernhard Tischbein, Rashid Mahmood, Christian Borgemeister, Martina Flörke, Fazlullah Akhtar
{"title":"Analysing and evaluating environmental flows through hydrological methods in the regulated Indus River Basin","authors":"Kashif Mehmood,&nbsp;Bernhard Tischbein,&nbsp;Rashid Mahmood,&nbsp;Christian Borgemeister,&nbsp;Martina Flörke,&nbsp;Fazlullah Akhtar","doi":"10.1002/eco.2624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental flows (EFs), essential for upholding the ecological integrity of rivers and aquatic habitats, have been disrupted significantly by diverting water for agricultural, industrial and domestic uses. This underscores the imperative of implementing sustainable water resource management to harmonize agricultural and environmental needs. The study was conducted in the Indus River Basin (IRB), a region extensively transformed by human interventions. EFs were determined through various techniques, including the flow duration curve shifting method, flow duration curve analysis, low-flow indices, the Tennant method, the Smakhtin approach, the Tessmann method and the Pastor method. Analysing the estimated EFs alongside downstream flows unveiled specific timeframes (days, months and seasons) of unmet EF requirements. To safeguard the downstream ecosystems, the following EFs were estimated for the respective locations: 880 m<sup>3</sup>/s (38% of the mean annual flow [MAF]) for the Indus River at Tarbela Dam, 412 m<sup>3</sup>/s (48% of the MAF) for the Jhelum at Mangla Dam, 425 m<sup>3</sup>/s (44% of the MAF) for the Chenab at Marala headworks, 389 m<sup>3</sup>/s (56% of MAF) for the Ravi at Balloki headworks, 184 m<sup>3</sup>/s (50% of MAF) for the Sutlej at Sulemanki headworks and 231 m<sup>3</sup>/s (38% of MAF) below Kotri Barrage. The study revealed that violations of EFs occurred 41%, 43%, 44% and 52% of the time during the study period for the Chenab at Marala headworks, the Ravi at Balloki headworks, the Sutlej at Sulemanki headworks and the Indus River at the Kotri Barrage, respectively. The results highlighted that the Chenab, Ravi and Sutlej rivers are particularly susceptible to vulnerability, as the estimated EFs were not consistently upheld in these rivers. These findings underscore the urgent need to take appropriate measures to ensure EFs are not violated, thus safeguarding the downstream ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eco.2624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental flows (EFs), essential for upholding the ecological integrity of rivers and aquatic habitats, have been disrupted significantly by diverting water for agricultural, industrial and domestic uses. This underscores the imperative of implementing sustainable water resource management to harmonize agricultural and environmental needs. The study was conducted in the Indus River Basin (IRB), a region extensively transformed by human interventions. EFs were determined through various techniques, including the flow duration curve shifting method, flow duration curve analysis, low-flow indices, the Tennant method, the Smakhtin approach, the Tessmann method and the Pastor method. Analysing the estimated EFs alongside downstream flows unveiled specific timeframes (days, months and seasons) of unmet EF requirements. To safeguard the downstream ecosystems, the following EFs were estimated for the respective locations: 880 m3/s (38% of the mean annual flow [MAF]) for the Indus River at Tarbela Dam, 412 m3/s (48% of the MAF) for the Jhelum at Mangla Dam, 425 m3/s (44% of the MAF) for the Chenab at Marala headworks, 389 m3/s (56% of MAF) for the Ravi at Balloki headworks, 184 m3/s (50% of MAF) for the Sutlej at Sulemanki headworks and 231 m3/s (38% of MAF) below Kotri Barrage. The study revealed that violations of EFs occurred 41%, 43%, 44% and 52% of the time during the study period for the Chenab at Marala headworks, the Ravi at Balloki headworks, the Sutlej at Sulemanki headworks and the Indus River at the Kotri Barrage, respectively. The results highlighted that the Chenab, Ravi and Sutlej rivers are particularly susceptible to vulnerability, as the estimated EFs were not consistently upheld in these rivers. These findings underscore the urgent need to take appropriate measures to ensure EFs are not violated, thus safeguarding the downstream ecosystems.

Abstract Image

通过水文方法分析和评估受管制的印度河流域的环境流量
环境流量(EFs)对维护河流和水生生境的生态完整性至关重要,但由于农业、工业和家庭用水的转移,环境流量受到严重破坏。这凸显了实施可持续水资源管理以协调农业和环境需求的必要性。这项研究在印度河流域(IRB)进行,该地区因人类干预而发生了广泛变化。通过各种技术确定了 EFs,包括流量持续时间曲线移动法、流量持续时间曲线分析、低流量指数、Tennant 法、Smakhtin 法、Tessmann 法和 Pastor 法。通过分析估计的 EFs 和下游流量,揭示了未满足 EF 要求的具体时间范围(天、月和季)。为保护下游生态系统,对相应地点的 EFs 进行了估算:塔贝拉大坝的印度河为 880 立方米/秒(占年平均流量的 38%),曼格拉大坝的杰赫勒姆河为 412 立方米/秒(占年平均流量的 48%),马拉渠首的切纳布河为 425 立方米/秒(占年平均流量的 44%)、389 立方米/秒(占最大含水量的 56%),苏莱曼基坝址的苏特莱杰河为 184 立方米/秒(占最大含水量的 50%),科特里拦河坝以下为 231 立方米/秒(占最大含水量的 38%)。研究显示,在研究期间,在马拉拉渠首的切纳布河、巴洛基渠首的拉维河、苏莱曼基渠首的苏特莱杰河和科特里拦河坝的印度河分别有 41%、43%、44% 和 52%的时间违反了 EFs。研究结果表明,切纳布河、拉维河和苏特雷杰河特别容易受到影响,因为这些河流的估计环境系数并不稳定。这些结果突出表明,迫切需要采取适当措施,确保不违反 EFs,从而保护下游生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信