{"title":"Gender Differences in Shame Among Individuals with Social Anxiety Disorder","authors":"Roni Oren-Yagoda, May Rosenblum, Idan M. Aderka","doi":"10.1007/s10608-023-10461-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Shame is an important emotion in social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, gender differences in shame, as well as the temporal relationship between shame and anxiety in SAD have not been examined. The present study aimed to address these gaps.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Participants were 88 individuals (44 with SAD and 44 without SAD) who completed a 21-day experience sampling measurement (ESM). Specifically, participants reported on their emotions once a day at random times.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Hierarchical Linear Modeling indicated that individuals with SAD reported significantly more shame compared to individuals without SAD. In addition, women reported significantly more shame compared to men. Importantly, gender differences in shame were more pronounced among individuals with SAD compared to those without SAD. Finally, we found that for individuals without SAD, shame on a given day significantly predicted anxiety on the following day among men but not among women, whereas for individuals with SAD, shame on a given day significantly predicted anxiety on the following day among both men and women.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that shame may play a role in the maintenance of SAD. In addition, our findings suggest that social anxiety disorder may impact women’s experience of shame more than men’s.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10461-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Shame is an important emotion in social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, gender differences in shame, as well as the temporal relationship between shame and anxiety in SAD have not been examined. The present study aimed to address these gaps.
Methods
Participants were 88 individuals (44 with SAD and 44 without SAD) who completed a 21-day experience sampling measurement (ESM). Specifically, participants reported on their emotions once a day at random times.
Results
Hierarchical Linear Modeling indicated that individuals with SAD reported significantly more shame compared to individuals without SAD. In addition, women reported significantly more shame compared to men. Importantly, gender differences in shame were more pronounced among individuals with SAD compared to those without SAD. Finally, we found that for individuals without SAD, shame on a given day significantly predicted anxiety on the following day among men but not among women, whereas for individuals with SAD, shame on a given day significantly predicted anxiety on the following day among both men and women.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that shame may play a role in the maintenance of SAD. In addition, our findings suggest that social anxiety disorder may impact women’s experience of shame more than men’s.
背景羞耻感是社交焦虑症(SAD)中的一种重要情绪。然而,羞耻感的性别差异以及 SAD 中羞耻感与焦虑之间的时间关系尚未得到研究。本研究旨在填补这些空白。研究方法:88 名参与者(44 名患有 SAD,44 名未患有 SAD)完成了为期 21 天的经验取样测量(ESM)。结果层次线性建模表明,与无 SAD 的人相比,有 SAD 的人报告的羞耻感明显更多。此外,与男性相比,女性报告的羞愧感明显更多。重要的是,与非 SAD 患者相比,SAD 患者在羞耻感方面的性别差异更为明显。最后,我们发现,对于没有 SAD 的人来说,某一天的羞耻感会显著预测男性第二天的焦虑,但对于女性来说则不会;而对于有 SAD 的人来说,某一天的羞耻感会显著预测男性和女性第二天的焦虑。此外,我们的研究结果还表明,社交焦虑症对女性羞耻感体验的影响可能大于男性。
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.