Do people gamble or invest in the cryptocurrency market? Transactional-level evidence from Thailand

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Voraprapa Nakavachara , Roongkiat Ratanabanchuen , Kanis Saengchote , Thitiphong Amonthumniyom , Pongsathon Parinyavuttichai , Polpatt Vinaibodee
{"title":"Do people gamble or invest in the cryptocurrency market? Transactional-level evidence from Thailand","authors":"Voraprapa Nakavachara ,&nbsp;Roongkiat Ratanabanchuen ,&nbsp;Kanis Saengchote ,&nbsp;Thitiphong Amonthumniyom ,&nbsp;Pongsathon Parinyavuttichai ,&nbsp;Polpatt Vinaibodee","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Should cryptocurrencies be viewed as a gambling tool or a risky investment instrument? While their unpredictable returns resemble gambling, recent studies show their prices having a time-varying correlation with traditional risky assets like the S&amp;P 500. Many institutional investors have, thus, included cryptocurrencies in their portfolios for diversification. This paper examines the behavior of cryptocurrency market participants and investigates whether they behave like gamblers or investors. Literature shows that gamblers often engage in loss-chasing behavior, escalating risk-taking after losses that may go on indefinitely. In contrast, investors typically exhibit risk aversion after losses, though some might increase risk-taking after “paper losses,” a phenomenon called the “realization effect.” Our study found high-risk individuals exhibit gambling-like behavior, chasing both realized and paper losses. In contrast, we found limited evidence that low-risk individuals engage in risk aversion and realization effect, similar to investors. These insights are crucial for policymakers, as loss-chasing can lead to the siutation where people taking on more risk than they can afford, potentially resulting in bankruptcy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100895"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Should cryptocurrencies be viewed as a gambling tool or a risky investment instrument? While their unpredictable returns resemble gambling, recent studies show their prices having a time-varying correlation with traditional risky assets like the S&P 500. Many institutional investors have, thus, included cryptocurrencies in their portfolios for diversification. This paper examines the behavior of cryptocurrency market participants and investigates whether they behave like gamblers or investors. Literature shows that gamblers often engage in loss-chasing behavior, escalating risk-taking after losses that may go on indefinitely. In contrast, investors typically exhibit risk aversion after losses, though some might increase risk-taking after “paper losses,” a phenomenon called the “realization effect.” Our study found high-risk individuals exhibit gambling-like behavior, chasing both realized and paper losses. In contrast, we found limited evidence that low-risk individuals engage in risk aversion and realization effect, similar to investors. These insights are crucial for policymakers, as loss-chasing can lead to the siutation where people taking on more risk than they can afford, potentially resulting in bankruptcy.

人们是在加密货币市场赌博还是投资?泰国交易层面的证据
加密货币应被视为赌博工具还是风险投资工具?虽然加密货币难以预测的收益类似于赌博,但最近的研究表明,加密货币的价格与传统风险资产(如 S&P 500 指数)存在时变相关性。因此,许多机构投资者将加密货币纳入其投资组合,以实现多样化。本文研究了加密货币市场参与者的行为,并探讨了他们的行为是像赌徒还是投资者。文献表明,赌徒经常会出现追逐损失的行为,在损失可能无限期地持续下去之后,风险承担会不断升级。与此相反,投资者在损失后通常会表现出风险规避行为,尽管有些人在 "纸面损失 "后可能会增加风险承担,这种现象被称为 "变现效应"。我们的研究发现,高风险个体表现出类似赌博的行为,既追逐已实现的损失,也追逐纸面上的损失。与此相反,我们发现有限的证据表明,低风险个体会出现风险规避和变现效应,与投资者类似。这些见解对政策制定者至关重要,因为追逐损失可能导致人们承担超出自身承受能力的风险,从而可能导致破产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信