Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, Including Preliminary Analyses of the Parent Versions for Use with Children.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Hashir Aazh, Chloe Hayes, Mercede Erfanian, Brian C J Moore, Silia Vitoratou
{"title":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire, Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire, and Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus, Including Preliminary Analyses of the Parent Versions for Use with Children.","authors":"Hashir Aazh, Chloe Hayes, Mercede Erfanian, Brian C J Moore, Silia Vitoratou","doi":"10.1055/a-2255-7643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> We previously reported the results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire (HIQ), the Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire (SSSD), and the Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus (SAD-T). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is necessary to confirm the latent constructs determined using EFA. CFA should use different samples but with similar characteristics to those used for EFA.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> The aim was to use CFA to confirm latent constructs derived using EFA of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T. We further evaluated the psychometric properties of parent versions of these questionnaires (indicated by -P), which are intended for use with children.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> This was a retrospective cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Data for 323 consecutive adults and 49 children who attended a Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Therapy Clinic in the United Kingdom within a 6-month period were included.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> Data were collected retrospectively from the records of patients held at the Audiology Department. CFA with the weighted least-squares mean and variance-adjusted estimator was applied to assess the previously proposed factor structures of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T. The internal consistency of the scales was assessed via Cronbach's α (α). The items of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T were tested for measurement invariance regarding age and gender using the multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> All questionnaires showed good to excellent internal consistency, with α = 0.93 for the HIQ, 0.87 for the SSSQ, and 0.91 for the SAD-T. The parent versions showed acceptable to good internal consistency, with α = 0.88 for the HIQ-P, 0.71 for the SSSQ-P, and 0.86 for the SAD-T-P. CFA showed that the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T were all one-factor questionnaires and the factors generally were similar to those obtained for the EFA. The MIMIC model showed that all three questionnaires can be considered as measurement invariant, with scores similar across genders and ages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T are internally consistent one-factor questionnaires that can be used in clinical and research settings to assess the impact of hyperacusis, the severity of sound sensitivity symptoms, and to screen for anxiety and depression symptoms. Future studies should further explore the psychometric properties of the parent versions of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2255-7643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  We previously reported the results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Hyperacusis Impact Questionnaire (HIQ), the Sound Sensitivity Symptoms Questionnaire (SSSD), and the Screening for Anxiety and Depression in Tinnitus (SAD-T). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is necessary to confirm the latent constructs determined using EFA. CFA should use different samples but with similar characteristics to those used for EFA.

Purpose:  The aim was to use CFA to confirm latent constructs derived using EFA of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T. We further evaluated the psychometric properties of parent versions of these questionnaires (indicated by -P), which are intended for use with children.

Research design:  This was a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Study sample:  Data for 323 consecutive adults and 49 children who attended a Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Therapy Clinic in the United Kingdom within a 6-month period were included.

Data collection and analysis:  Data were collected retrospectively from the records of patients held at the Audiology Department. CFA with the weighted least-squares mean and variance-adjusted estimator was applied to assess the previously proposed factor structures of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T. The internal consistency of the scales was assessed via Cronbach's α (α). The items of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T were tested for measurement invariance regarding age and gender using the multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) model.

Results:  All questionnaires showed good to excellent internal consistency, with α = 0.93 for the HIQ, 0.87 for the SSSQ, and 0.91 for the SAD-T. The parent versions showed acceptable to good internal consistency, with α = 0.88 for the HIQ-P, 0.71 for the SSSQ-P, and 0.86 for the SAD-T-P. CFA showed that the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T were all one-factor questionnaires and the factors generally were similar to those obtained for the EFA. The MIMIC model showed that all three questionnaires can be considered as measurement invariant, with scores similar across genders and ages.

Conclusion: The HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T are internally consistent one-factor questionnaires that can be used in clinical and research settings to assess the impact of hyperacusis, the severity of sound sensitivity symptoms, and to screen for anxiety and depression symptoms. Future studies should further explore the psychometric properties of the parent versions of the HIQ, SSSQ, and SAD-T.

对耳鸣影响问卷、声敏感症状问卷以及耳鸣焦虑和抑郁筛查进行了确认性因素分析,包括对用于儿童的家长版本进行了初步分析。
背景:我们曾报告过对耳鸣影响问卷(HIQ)、声敏感症状问卷(SSSD)和耳鸣焦虑和抑郁筛查(SAD-T)进行探索性因子分析(EFA)的结果。有必要进行确证因子分析(CFA),以确认通过 EFA 确定的潜在结构。目的:本研究的目的是使用 CFA 来确认 HIQ、SSSQ 和 SAD-T 通过 EFA 得出的潜在构念。我们还进一步评估了这些问卷的家长版(用-P表示)的心理测量特性,这些问卷是为儿童设计的:这是一项回顾性横断面研究:研究样本:包括在六个月内连续到英国耳鸣和听力障碍治疗诊所就诊的 323 名成人和 49 名儿童的数据:数据收集与分析:从听力科保存的患者记录中回顾性收集数据。使用加权最小二乘均值和方差调整估计器进行 CFA,以评估之前提出的 HIQ、SSSQ 和 SAD-T 的因子结构。量表的内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha (α) 进行评估。使用多指标多原因模型(MIMIC)对 HIQ、SSSQ 和 SAD-T 的项目进行了年龄和性别测量不变性测试:结果:所有问卷均显示出良好至卓越的内部一致性,HIQ 的 α = 0.93,SSSQ 的 α = 0.87,SAD-T 的 α = 0.91。父版本显示出可接受到良好的内部一致性,HIQ-P 的 α = 0.88,SSSQ-P 的 α = 0.71,SAD-T-P 的 α = 0.86。CFA显示,HIQ、SSSQ和SAD-T都是单因素问卷,其因素与EFA得到的因素基本相似。MIMIC 模型显示,所有这三种问卷都可以被视为测量不变式,不同性别和年龄的人得分相似:HIQ、SSSQ 和 SAD-T 是内部一致的单因素问卷,可用于临床和研究环境,以评估听力障碍的影响、声敏感症状的严重程度,以及筛查焦虑和抑郁症状。未来的研究应进一步探讨 HIQ 和 SSSQ 及 SAD-T 母语版本的心理计量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信