Cross-sectional study of the associations between the implementation of the WHO FCTC tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship bans and current e-cigarette use among youth from countries with different income levels.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tuija Ylitörmänen, Yelena Tarasenko, Heikki Hiilamo, Otto Ruokolainen, Pekka Puska, Hanna Ollila
{"title":"Cross-sectional study of the associations between the implementation of the WHO FCTC tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship bans and current e-cigarette use among youth from countries with different income levels.","authors":"Tuija Ylitörmänen, Yelena Tarasenko, Heikki Hiilamo, Otto Ruokolainen, Pekka Puska, Hanna Ollila","doi":"10.1136/tc-2023-058160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) Article 13 requires countries to ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS), and bans are recommended to cover electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We examined youth e-cigarette prevalence by TAPS regulations in countries with different income levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data on 165 299 respondents from 48 countries with 2016/2018 WHO FCTC implementation reports and 2016-2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. We used multilevel logistic regressions to examine associations between TAPS regulations and current e-cigarette use, stratified by country income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 1 in 10 respondents was currently using e-cigarettes. Respondents in countries with TAPS bans on the internet were less likely to use e-cigarettes (adjOR=0.58; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86) than youth in countries without such bans. In lower middle-income and low-income countries, bans on displaying tobacco products at the point of sale (adjOR=0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90), bans on product placement (adjOR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.69) and strength of additional TAPS measures were associated with lower prevalence of e-cigarette use among students. Being taught about the dangers of the use of tobacco in school was associated with lower odds of e-cigarette use. No differences in the use of e-cigarettes were observed by types of TAPS among respondents in high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strengthening implementation of TAPS policies and assuring they cover new and emerging products, online channels and points of sales are essential, especially in lower income countries. Maintaining tobacco health education is also important to protect youth from e-cigarette use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":"443-451"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12322421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) Article 13 requires countries to ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS), and bans are recommended to cover electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We examined youth e-cigarette prevalence by TAPS regulations in countries with different income levels.

Methods: We analysed data on 165 299 respondents from 48 countries with 2016/2018 WHO FCTC implementation reports and 2016-2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. We used multilevel logistic regressions to examine associations between TAPS regulations and current e-cigarette use, stratified by country income.

Results: About 1 in 10 respondents was currently using e-cigarettes. Respondents in countries with TAPS bans on the internet were less likely to use e-cigarettes (adjOR=0.58; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86) than youth in countries without such bans. In lower middle-income and low-income countries, bans on displaying tobacco products at the point of sale (adjOR=0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90), bans on product placement (adjOR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.69) and strength of additional TAPS measures were associated with lower prevalence of e-cigarette use among students. Being taught about the dangers of the use of tobacco in school was associated with lower odds of e-cigarette use. No differences in the use of e-cigarettes were observed by types of TAPS among respondents in high-income countries.

Conclusions: Strengthening implementation of TAPS policies and assuring they cover new and emerging products, online channels and points of sales are essential, especially in lower income countries. Maintaining tobacco health education is also important to protect youth from e-cigarette use.

Abstract Image

关于世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)烟草广告、促销和赞助禁令的实施与不同收入水平国家的青少年目前使用电子烟之间关系的横断面研究。
背景:世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》(WHO FCTC)第 13 条要求各国禁止烟草广告、促销和赞助(TAPS),并建议将电子烟(e-cigarettes)也纳入禁止范围。我们根据不同收入水平国家的烟草广告、促销和赞助(TAPS)法规研究了青少年电子烟的流行情况:我们分析了来自 48 个国家的 165 299 名受访者的数据,其中包括 2016/2018 年世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》实施报告和 2016-2019 年全球青年烟草调查。我们使用多层次逻辑回归来研究 TAPS 法规与当前电子烟使用之间的关联,并按国家收入水平进行分层:结果:每 10 名受访者中约有 1 人目前正在使用电子烟。在禁止在互联网上使用 TAPS 的国家,受访者使用电子烟的可能性(adjOR=0.58;95% CI 0.39 至 0.86)低于没有此类禁令的国家。在中低收入国家,禁止在销售点展示烟草产品(adjOR=0.55;95% CI 0.34 至 0.90)、禁止产品摆放(adjOR=0.44;95% CI 0.28 至 0.69)以及 TAPS 额外措施的力度与学生中较低的电子烟使用率相关。在学校接受有关烟草使用危害的教育与较低的电子烟使用率相关。在高收入国家的受访者中,没有观察到不同类型的 TAPS 对电子烟使用率的影响:加强 TAPS 政策的实施并确保其涵盖新兴产品、在线渠道和销售点至关重要,尤其是在低收入国家。坚持开展烟草健康教育对于保护青少年免受电子烟危害也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信