Patient profiles and success rates under different sedation techniques in a tertiary care center.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andra Rettman, Valeri Klitinich, David Gozal, Yair Sharav, Galit Almoznino, Yaron Haviv, Mais Haj-Yahia, Abla Sabbagh Jubran, Doron J Aframian, Robert Yanko
{"title":"Patient profiles and success rates under different sedation techniques in a tertiary care center.","authors":"Andra Rettman, Valeri Klitinich, David Gozal, Yair Sharav, Galit Almoznino, Yaron Haviv, Mais Haj-Yahia, Abla Sabbagh Jubran, Doron J Aframian, Robert Yanko","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b4920311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sedation is commonly utilized for individuals otherwise unable to receive dental treatment, such as those with disabilities, medically complex conditions, and dentophobics. The aim was to characterize the profiles of patients receiving various types of sedation and assess the corresponding success rates.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>This was a 5-year records-based retrospective study. Data regarding the indication for sedation, medical history, sedation type, and treatments performed were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 103 patients underwent 389 treatment sessions under sedation; 42.7% of the patients were disabled. The most commonly administered sedation was moderate sedation, (49.4%), followed by deep (36.8%) and inhaled sedation (13.9%). Successful treatment results were achieved in 96.1% of sessions, with no adverse effects noted during recovery. The high success rates were independent of patient age, sex, and sedation type. There was a positive association between the indication for sedation and the type of sedation. The medically complex patients and the dentophobic patients received mainly moderate sedation (85.3% and 58.2%, respectively), whereas the disabled patients received deep sedation (51.2%). In total, 94% of patients were returning (re-visiting) patients. A statistically significant association was found between the type of sedation administered and the success rate during the first and last sessions (P < .001). The success rate at the first session may be predictive of the success in subsequent sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant positive correlation was found between patient characteristics and the chosen sedation type leading to a high success rate across the various sedation modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4920311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Sedation is commonly utilized for individuals otherwise unable to receive dental treatment, such as those with disabilities, medically complex conditions, and dentophobics. The aim was to characterize the profiles of patients receiving various types of sedation and assess the corresponding success rates.

Method and materials: This was a 5-year records-based retrospective study. Data regarding the indication for sedation, medical history, sedation type, and treatments performed were recorded.

Results: In total, 103 patients underwent 389 treatment sessions under sedation; 42.7% of the patients were disabled. The most commonly administered sedation was moderate sedation, (49.4%), followed by deep (36.8%) and inhaled sedation (13.9%). Successful treatment results were achieved in 96.1% of sessions, with no adverse effects noted during recovery. The high success rates were independent of patient age, sex, and sedation type. There was a positive association between the indication for sedation and the type of sedation. The medically complex patients and the dentophobic patients received mainly moderate sedation (85.3% and 58.2%, respectively), whereas the disabled patients received deep sedation (51.2%). In total, 94% of patients were returning (re-visiting) patients. A statistically significant association was found between the type of sedation administered and the success rate during the first and last sessions (P < .001). The success rate at the first session may be predictive of the success in subsequent sessions.

Conclusion: A significant positive correlation was found between patient characteristics and the chosen sedation type leading to a high success rate across the various sedation modalities.

一家三级医疗中心采用不同镇静技术的患者概况和成功率。
目的:镇静通常用于无法接受牙科治疗的人,如残疾、病情复杂和牙科恐惧症患者。我们旨在了解接受各种镇静剂的患者的特征,并评估相应的成功率:一项为期 5 年的基于记录的回顾性研究。结果:103 名患者接受了 389 次治疗:结果:103 名患者在镇静状态下接受了 389 次治疗。42.7%的患者为残疾人。最常用的镇静方法是中度镇静(49.4%),其次是深度镇静(36.8%)和吸入镇静(13.9%)。96.1%的疗程取得了成功的治疗效果,恢复期间未发现任何不良反应。高成功率与患者的年龄、性别和镇静类型无关。镇静适应症与镇静类型之间存在正相关。病情复杂的患者和牙科恐惧症患者主要接受中度镇静(分别为 85.3% 和 58.2%),而残疾患者则接受深度镇静(51.2%)。94%的患者为复诊(再次就诊)患者。在统计学上,所使用的镇静剂类型与首次和最后一次治疗的成功率之间存在明显的关联(p 结论:患者使用的镇静剂类型与首次和最后一次治疗的成功率之间存在明显的正相关:研究发现,患者特征与所选镇静剂类型之间存在明显的正相关关系,因此各种镇静方式的成功率都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信