Bridging the gap between science and food policy: nutrition as a driver of policy drawing on Scotland as a case study.

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1017/S002966512400003X
Margaret Gill, Kieran Fowler, E Marian Scott
{"title":"Bridging the gap between science and food policy: nutrition as a driver of policy drawing on Scotland as a case study.","authors":"Margaret Gill, Kieran Fowler, E Marian Scott","doi":"10.1017/S002966512400003X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to adequate food is one of the Human Rights set out in international law and hence its delivery (through policy) is the role of government. 'Food policy' cannot be the role of a single government department, however, since regulations must take care of public goods (e.g. public health and protecting the natural environment) while also creating an economic environment attractive to private sector participation. From the mid-20<sup>th</sup> century, much of food policy was driven by a need to encourage the production base, but more recently the importance of considering food policy through the lens of nutritional requirements is increasingly recognised, alongside the importance of minimising environmental damage. This review paper draws on experience of working with policymakers (in particular the Scottish Government) and of active participation in an EC-commissioned project. It highlights the need for the research community to invest time and resources in understanding what evidence policymakers are asking for and to consider that alongside evidence from those who will be impacted by the policy (stakeholders). Examples of effective ways of engaging stakeholders and policy communities simultaneously are outlined and the paper provides some thoughts on the boundaries between the science and policy communities and how to bridge them. The Case Study also highlights the importance of evidence to inform prioritisation and consultation at a local level when aiming to meet multiple policy goals nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":" ","pages":"204-209"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002966512400003X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to adequate food is one of the Human Rights set out in international law and hence its delivery (through policy) is the role of government. 'Food policy' cannot be the role of a single government department, however, since regulations must take care of public goods (e.g. public health and protecting the natural environment) while also creating an economic environment attractive to private sector participation. From the mid-20th century, much of food policy was driven by a need to encourage the production base, but more recently the importance of considering food policy through the lens of nutritional requirements is increasingly recognised, alongside the importance of minimising environmental damage. This review paper draws on experience of working with policymakers (in particular the Scottish Government) and of active participation in an EC-commissioned project. It highlights the need for the research community to invest time and resources in understanding what evidence policymakers are asking for and to consider that alongside evidence from those who will be impacted by the policy (stakeholders). Examples of effective ways of engaging stakeholders and policy communities simultaneously are outlined and the paper provides some thoughts on the boundaries between the science and policy communities and how to bridge them. The Case Study also highlights the importance of evidence to inform prioritisation and consultation at a local level when aiming to meet multiple policy goals nationally.

缩小科学与食品政策之间的差距:以苏格兰为案例研究,将营养作为政策的推动力。
获得充足的食物是国际法规定的人权之一,因此,(通过政策)提供食物是政府的职责。然而,"粮食政策 "不可能是一个政府部门的职责,因为法规必须照顾到公共产品(如公共卫生和保护自然环境),同时还要创造一个吸引私营部门参与的经济环境。从 20 世纪中期开始,大部分粮食政策都是由鼓励生产基地的需求驱动的,但最近,人们越来越认识到从营养需求的角度来考虑粮食政策的重要性,以及将环境损害降至最低的重要性。本综述文件借鉴了与政策制定者(尤其是苏格兰政府)合作的经验,以及积极参与欧共体委托项目的经验。它强调,研究界需要投入时间和资源,了解政策制定者需要哪些证据,并将这些证据与受政策影响者(利益相关者)提供的证据一并考虑。本文概述了同时吸引利益相关者和政策制定者参与的有效方法,并就科学界和政策制定者之间的界限以及如何弥合这些界限提出了一些想法。该案例研究还强调了在旨在实现全国性多重政策目标时,在地方一级为优先事项的确定和磋商提供依据的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信