Efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome patients.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864231219151
Fang Fang, Xiao-Xi Lan, Rong-Hua Hu, Wu-Han Hui, Hong Zhao, Yi-Xian Guo, Bing-Xin Ji, Hong-Jun Liu, Li Su, Wan-Ling Sun
{"title":"Efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome patients.","authors":"Fang Fang, Xiao-Xi Lan, Rong-Hua Hu, Wu-Han Hui, Hong Zhao, Yi-Xian Guo, Bing-Xin Ji, Hong-Jun Liu, Li Su, Wan-Ling Sun","doi":"10.1177/17562864231219151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the rarity of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, the best first-line treatment has not been established, although there are several options in guidelines. The preferred treatments vary according to the preference of the physician and anecdote.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>First, to analyze the efficacy of a new treatment mode in POEMS syndrome that uses the four-cycle treatment as the induction regimen, followed by sequential transplantation as the consolidation regimen for transplantation-eligible patients, or received another two-cycle treatment for transplantation-ineligible patients. Second, to compare the efficacy and safety of regimens with a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone, BCD) or without a proteasome inhibitor (cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone ± thalidomide, CD ± T).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data from Capital Medical University, Xuanwu Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 34 newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome patients met Dispenzieri's diagnostic criteria, and those who completed at least four cycles of treatment from July 2013 to March 2021 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) response rate of this new treatment mode was 100%. The cumulative VEGF complete remission (CR<sub>V</sub>) rate was 67.9%, and the cumulative complete hematological response (CR<sub>H</sub>) rate was 55.6%. During the median 49-month follow-up, the 5-year-overall survival (OS) rate was 90.7%, the 3-year-progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 78.4%, and the 5-year-PFS rate was 73.8%. The BCD regimen achieved a 75% CR<sub>V</sub> rate (median time from diagnosis to CR<sub>V</sub> = 130 days) and 66.7% CR<sub>H</sub> rate (median time from diagnosis to CR<sub>H</sub> = 218 days). In addition, the VEGF response was less than the partial remission (PR<sub>V</sub>) after four-cycle induction treatment, which, together with a decrease on the Overall Neurological Limitation Scale of less than three points 1 year after consolidation treatment, was an independent poor prognostic factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bortezomib was well-tolerated by patients with POEMS syndrome. Compared with CD ± T regimen, BCD as the induction regimen achieved better VEGF response and earlier hematological remission. Autologous stem cell transplantation used as consolidation therapy further improved the neurological and hematological remission rates, resulting in better OS and PFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562864231219151"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10823847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864231219151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the rarity of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, the best first-line treatment has not been established, although there are several options in guidelines. The preferred treatments vary according to the preference of the physician and anecdote.

Objectives: First, to analyze the efficacy of a new treatment mode in POEMS syndrome that uses the four-cycle treatment as the induction regimen, followed by sequential transplantation as the consolidation regimen for transplantation-eligible patients, or received another two-cycle treatment for transplantation-ineligible patients. Second, to compare the efficacy and safety of regimens with a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone, BCD) or without a proteasome inhibitor (cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone ± thalidomide, CD ± T).

Design: We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data from Capital Medical University, Xuanwu Hospital.

Methods: A total of 34 newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome patients met Dispenzieri's diagnostic criteria, and those who completed at least four cycles of treatment from July 2013 to March 2021 were included.

Results: The overall vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) response rate of this new treatment mode was 100%. The cumulative VEGF complete remission (CRV) rate was 67.9%, and the cumulative complete hematological response (CRH) rate was 55.6%. During the median 49-month follow-up, the 5-year-overall survival (OS) rate was 90.7%, the 3-year-progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 78.4%, and the 5-year-PFS rate was 73.8%. The BCD regimen achieved a 75% CRV rate (median time from diagnosis to CRV = 130 days) and 66.7% CRH rate (median time from diagnosis to CRH = 218 days). In addition, the VEGF response was less than the partial remission (PRV) after four-cycle induction treatment, which, together with a decrease on the Overall Neurological Limitation Scale of less than three points 1 year after consolidation treatment, was an independent poor prognostic factor.

Conclusion: Bortezomib was well-tolerated by patients with POEMS syndrome. Compared with CD ± T regimen, BCD as the induction regimen achieved better VEGF response and earlier hematological remission. Autologous stem cell transplantation used as consolidation therapy further improved the neurological and hematological remission rates, resulting in better OS and PFS.

硼替佐米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松对新诊断的 POEMS 综合征患者的疗效。
背景:由于多发性神经病、器官肥大、内分泌病、单克隆丙种球蛋白病和皮肤改变(POEMS)综合征的罕见性,尽管指南中有多种选择,但最佳的一线治疗方法尚未确定。首选治疗方法因医生的偏好和轶事而异:首先,分析一种新的 POEMS 综合征治疗模式的疗效,该模式以四周期治疗作为诱导治疗方案,然后对符合移植条件的患者以序贯移植作为巩固治疗方案,或对不符合移植条件的患者接受另一种两周期治疗。其次,比较使用蛋白酶体抑制剂(硼替佐米-环磷酰胺-地塞米松,BCD)或不使用蛋白酶体抑制剂(环磷酰胺-地塞米松±沙利度胺,CD±T)的治疗方案的疗效和安全性:我们利用首都医科大学宣武医院的真实数据进行了一项回顾性研究:方法:共纳入34例符合Dispenzieri诊断标准的新诊断POEMS综合征患者,这些患者在2013年7月至2021年3月期间完成了至少4个周期的治疗:这种新治疗模式的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)总反应率为100%。累积血管内皮生长因子完全缓解(CRV)率为67.9%,累积完全血液学反应(CRH)率为55.6%。在中位 49 个月的随访中,5 年总生存期(OS)为 90.7%,3 年无进展生存期(PFS)为 78.4%,5 年无进展生存期(PFS)为 73.8%。BCD方案的CRV率为75%(从诊断到CRV的中位时间=130天),CRH率为66.7%(从诊断到CRH的中位时间=218天)。此外,四周期诱导治疗后,VEGF反应低于部分缓解(PRV),再加上巩固治疗1年后神经功能总限制量表下降少于3分,这是一个独立的不良预后因素:结论:POEMS综合征患者对硼替佐米耐受性良好。结论:硼替佐米对POEMS综合征患者的耐受性良好,与CD±T方案相比,BCD作为诱导方案可获得更好的血管内皮生长因子反应和更早的血液学缓解。自体干细胞移植作为巩固治疗进一步提高了神经和血液学缓解率,从而改善了OS和PFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信