Significance of Physical Exercise in Pregnancy: Comparison of Short and Long Exercise Programs.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2231-7074
Esra Uzelpasacı, Levent Ozcakar, Serap Özgül, Özgür Özyüncü, Mehmet Sinan Beksac, Türkan Akbayrak
{"title":"Significance of Physical Exercise in Pregnancy: Comparison of Short and Long Exercise Programs.","authors":"Esra Uzelpasacı, Levent Ozcakar, Serap Özgül, Özgür Özyüncü, Mehmet Sinan Beksac, Türkan Akbayrak","doi":"10.1055/a-2231-7074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several musculoskeletal changes occur in pregnancy, particularly in the abdominal region. The aim of this study was to search and compare the effects of long (LEP) and short exercise programs (SEP) in terms of the satisfaction of the needs of pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of 2 groups: LEP (n=16) and SEP (n=16). Muscle thickness measurements determined by ultrasound, the 6 minute walk test, Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire were the study variables. Evaluations were done at the 16th (baseline), 24th, and 32nd gestational weeks. The LEP consisted of 20 and the SEP consisted of 9 exercises, which were applied for 16 weeks until the 32nd gestational week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emotional role limitation and pain scores of quality of life, 6 minute walk test, and occupational physical activity were found to be better in the LEP group at the 24th gestational week (p=0.043, p=0.049, p=0.049, p=0.026). At the 32nd gestational week, the 6 minute walk test and occupational physical activity were found to be higher in the LEP group (p=0.006, p=0.017). Additionally, rectus abdominis and bilateral diaphragm muscle thicknesses, \"moderate intensity and sports physical activity\" and \"vitality and emotional well-being\" were increased over time with the LEP (p+<+0.05 for all). On the other hand, unilateral diaphragm muscle thickness, sports physical activity level, and vitality were improved with the SEP (p+<+0.05 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SEP and LEP both have beneficial effects in pregnant women. However, the LEP increases physical activity level, functional capacity, and quality of life more than the SEP during the later stages of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2231-7074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several musculoskeletal changes occur in pregnancy, particularly in the abdominal region. The aim of this study was to search and compare the effects of long (LEP) and short exercise programs (SEP) in terms of the satisfaction of the needs of pregnant women.

Methods: This study consisted of 2 groups: LEP (n=16) and SEP (n=16). Muscle thickness measurements determined by ultrasound, the 6 minute walk test, Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire were the study variables. Evaluations were done at the 16th (baseline), 24th, and 32nd gestational weeks. The LEP consisted of 20 and the SEP consisted of 9 exercises, which were applied for 16 weeks until the 32nd gestational week.

Results: Emotional role limitation and pain scores of quality of life, 6 minute walk test, and occupational physical activity were found to be better in the LEP group at the 24th gestational week (p=0.043, p=0.049, p=0.049, p=0.026). At the 32nd gestational week, the 6 minute walk test and occupational physical activity were found to be higher in the LEP group (p=0.006, p=0.017). Additionally, rectus abdominis and bilateral diaphragm muscle thicknesses, "moderate intensity and sports physical activity" and "vitality and emotional well-being" were increased over time with the LEP (p+<+0.05 for all). On the other hand, unilateral diaphragm muscle thickness, sports physical activity level, and vitality were improved with the SEP (p+<+0.05 for all).

Conclusions: The SEP and LEP both have beneficial effects in pregnant women. However, the LEP increases physical activity level, functional capacity, and quality of life more than the SEP during the later stages of pregnancy.

孕期体育锻炼的意义:短期和长期锻炼计划的比较。
背景:怀孕期间会出现一些肌肉骨骼变化,尤其是腹部。本研究旨在寻找和比较长(LEP)和短(SEP)运动项目在满足孕妇需求方面的效果:本研究包括两组:方法:本研究包括两组:LEP(16 人)和 SEP(16 人)。研究变量包括超声波测量肌肉厚度、6 分钟步行测试、妊娠期体力活动问卷、视觉模拟量表、Oswestry 残疾指数和 Short Form-36 生活质量问卷。评估分别在妊娠第 16 周(基线)、第 24 周和第 32 周进行。LEP包括20个练习,SEP包括9个练习,持续16周,直到第32个妊娠周:结果:在第24孕周,LEP组的生活质量、6分钟步行测试和职业体力活动中的情感角色限制和疼痛评分较好(P=0.043、P=0.049、P=0.049、P=0.026)。在第 32 个孕周时,发现 LEP 组的 6 分钟步行测试和职业体力活动量更高(p=0.006,p=0.017)。此外,腹直肌和双侧膈肌厚度、"中等强度和体育锻炼 "以及 "活力和情绪健康 "也随着 LEP 的实施而增加(p+结论:SEP 和 LEP 都对孕妇有益。不过,在怀孕后期,LEP 比 SEP 更能提高身体活动水平、功能能力和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信