A Pilot Randomized Trial Evaluating the Cool 2 Be Safe Junior Playground Safety Program for Preschool Children.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Amanda Cox, Barbara A Morrongiello
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Trial Evaluating the Cool 2 Be Safe Junior Playground Safety Program for Preschool Children.","authors":"Amanda Cox, Barbara A Morrongiello","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death to children worldwide, and playgrounds pose a significant risk of injury. Those aged 5 and 6 years are particularly vulnerable to playground injuries. Previous interventions have typically targeted environmental modifications or increased supervision to reduce playground injuries; however, minimal research has focused on implementing behavioral interventions that seek to change children's safety knowledge and risk-taking behaviors on the playground. The current randomized trial addressed these gaps in the literature and sought to increase preschool children's hazard awareness skills and knowledge of unsafe playground behaviors and decrease their intentions to engage in risk-taking behaviors on the playground.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 77 children aged 5 and 6 years were tested at a laboratory on a university campus, using a parallel group design, with 38 randomized to the playground intervention group and 39 randomly assigned to a control group. The intervention was manualized and delivered to small groups of children (3-5) over several sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses revealed significant group differences. Intervention experience led to significant increases in hazard awareness skills and knowledge of unsafe playground behaviors, and significant decreases in children's risk-taking behavioral intentions, whereas those in the control group showed no significant changes in these scores. Attention scores for those in the intervention group highlighted that the program content was successful in maintaining children's attention and engagement, and memory scores indicated excellent retention of lesson content.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The program shows promise in addressing the issue of unintentional playground injuries in young children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"279-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death to children worldwide, and playgrounds pose a significant risk of injury. Those aged 5 and 6 years are particularly vulnerable to playground injuries. Previous interventions have typically targeted environmental modifications or increased supervision to reduce playground injuries; however, minimal research has focused on implementing behavioral interventions that seek to change children's safety knowledge and risk-taking behaviors on the playground. The current randomized trial addressed these gaps in the literature and sought to increase preschool children's hazard awareness skills and knowledge of unsafe playground behaviors and decrease their intentions to engage in risk-taking behaviors on the playground.

Method: A total of 77 children aged 5 and 6 years were tested at a laboratory on a university campus, using a parallel group design, with 38 randomized to the playground intervention group and 39 randomly assigned to a control group. The intervention was manualized and delivered to small groups of children (3-5) over several sessions.

Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant group differences. Intervention experience led to significant increases in hazard awareness skills and knowledge of unsafe playground behaviors, and significant decreases in children's risk-taking behavioral intentions, whereas those in the control group showed no significant changes in these scores. Attention scores for those in the intervention group highlighted that the program content was successful in maintaining children's attention and engagement, and memory scores indicated excellent retention of lesson content.

Conclusion: The program shows promise in addressing the issue of unintentional playground injuries in young children.

针对学龄前儿童的 "Cool 2 Be Safe Junior Playground Safety Program "进行试点随机试验评估。
目的:意外伤害是全球儿童死亡的主要原因,而游乐场则是造成伤害的重要风险场所。五六岁的儿童尤其容易在游乐场受伤。以往的干预措施通常以改善环境或加强监管为目标,以减少游乐场伤害;然而,很少有研究关注实施行为干预措施,以改变儿童的安全知识和在游乐场的冒险行为。目前的随机试验就是针对这些文献空白进行的,旨在提高学龄前儿童的危险意识技能和对操场上不安全行为的了解,减少他们在操场上冒险行为的意向:共有 77 名 5 至 6 岁的儿童在一所大学校园的实验室接受了测试,测试采用平行分组设计,其中 38 名儿童被随机分配到游乐场干预组,39 名儿童被随机分配到对照组。干预措施由手册进行指导,并分几节课对儿童(3-5 人)进行分组:统计分析显示,各组之间存在显著差异。通过干预,儿童的危险意识技能和对游乐场不安全行为的了解有了显著提高,儿童的冒险行为意向有了显著降低,而对照组的儿童在这些方面的得分没有显著变化。干预组儿童的注意力得分突出表明,该计划的内容成功地保持了儿童的注意力和参与度,而记忆得分则表明,儿童对课程内容的保持非常好:结论:该计划有望解决幼儿在游乐场意外受伤的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信