A Dramatic Response to Second-Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in BRAF-V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Case Reports in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000535902
Dahlia Fedele, Stefano Moroso, Angelo Turoldo, Gabriele Bazzocchi, Claudio Conforti, Iris Zalaudek, Alessandra Guglielmi
{"title":"A Dramatic Response to Second-Line Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in BRAF-V600-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma.","authors":"Dahlia Fedele, Stefano Moroso, Angelo Turoldo, Gabriele Bazzocchi, Claudio Conforti, Iris Zalaudek, Alessandra Guglielmi","doi":"10.1159/000535902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current treatment options for BRAF V600-mutated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma include anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3 agents, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and clinical trials. The strategy of combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has shown promising results, achieving higher response rates, longer duration of response, improved progression-free survival, and enhanced overall survival. The optimal sequence of treatments remains a topic of interest, with preliminary data suggesting a greater effectiveness of immunotherapy as the first-line approach. Preclinical trials have indicated that the efficacy of this sequence may be due to the modification of the immune environment by BRAF kinase inhibitors, leading to immune escape by tumor cells and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present a case of a 72-year-old woman with high-burden metastatic melanoma who failed to respond to prior targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and exhibited a successful response to the second-line treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab. We discuss the potential reasons for this positive outcome contributing to the current debate concerning treatment sequences, resistance mechanisms, and biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We believe that in few years the therapeutic algorithms in BRAF V600-mutated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma will be more complex since they will define clearly the correct therapeutic sequences with the inclusion of new immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs and multiple predictive biomarkers of response to better select patients eligible to immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9625,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current treatment options for BRAF V600-mutated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma include anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-LAG-3 agents, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, and clinical trials. The strategy of combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has shown promising results, achieving higher response rates, longer duration of response, improved progression-free survival, and enhanced overall survival. The optimal sequence of treatments remains a topic of interest, with preliminary data suggesting a greater effectiveness of immunotherapy as the first-line approach. Preclinical trials have indicated that the efficacy of this sequence may be due to the modification of the immune environment by BRAF kinase inhibitors, leading to immune escape by tumor cells and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Case presentation: We present a case of a 72-year-old woman with high-burden metastatic melanoma who failed to respond to prior targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and exhibited a successful response to the second-line treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab. We discuss the potential reasons for this positive outcome contributing to the current debate concerning treatment sequences, resistance mechanisms, and biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma.

Conclusion: We believe that in few years the therapeutic algorithms in BRAF V600-mutated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma will be more complex since they will define clearly the correct therapeutic sequences with the inclusion of new immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs and multiple predictive biomarkers of response to better select patients eligible to immunotherapy.

BRAF-V600突变转移性黑色素瘤患者对二线Nivolumab和Ipilimumab的显著反应
简介:BRAF V600突变的不可切除III/IV期黑色素瘤目前的治疗方案包括抗PD-1单药治疗或与抗CTLA-4或抗LAG-3药物、BRAF/MEK抑制剂和临床试验联合治疗。nivolumab和ipilimumab联合免疫疗法的策略已显示出良好的效果,可获得更高的应答率、更长的应答持续时间、更好的无进展生存期和更高的总生存期。治疗的最佳顺序仍是一个值得关注的话题,初步数据表明,免疫疗法作为一线治疗方法更有效。临床前试验表明,这一顺序的疗效可能是由于 BRAF 激酶抑制剂改变了免疫环境,导致肿瘤细胞免疫逃逸并对免疫检查点抑制剂产生抗药性:我们介绍了一例患有高负担转移性黑色素瘤的 72 岁女性患者的病例,她对之前使用 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂进行的靶向治疗没有反应,但对二线使用伊匹单抗和 nivolumab 进行的治疗表现出了成功的反应。我们讨论了这一积极结果的潜在原因,这有助于当前有关转移性黑色素瘤的治疗顺序、耐药机制和预测免疫检查点抑制剂反应的生物标志物的讨论:我们相信,几年后,BRAF V600 突变的不可切除 III/IV 期黑色素瘤的治疗算法将变得更加复杂,因为随着新型免疫检查点抑制剂药物和多种预测反应的生物标志物的加入,它们将明确定义正确的治疗顺序,以更好地选择符合免疫疗法条件的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信