Broken bones and apple brandy: resilience and sensemaking of general practitioners and their at-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2023.2269523
Rebekah A Hoeks, Michael J Deml, Julie Dubois, Oliver Senn, Sven Streit, Yael Rachamin, Katharina Tabea Jungo
{"title":"Broken bones and apple brandy: resilience and sensemaking of general practitioners and their at-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland.","authors":"Rebekah A Hoeks, Michael J Deml, Julie Dubois, Oliver Senn, Sven Streit, Yael Rachamin, Katharina Tabea Jungo","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2023.2269523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In early 2020, when the first COVID-19 cases were confirmed in Switzerland, the federal government started implementing measures such as national stay-at-home recommendations and a strict limitation of health care services use. General practitioners (GPs) and their at-risk patients faced similar uncertainties and grappled with subsequent sensemaking of the unprecedented situation. Qualitative interviews with 24 GPs and 37 at-risk patients were conducted which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Weick's (1993) four sources of -resilience - <i>improvisation, virtual role systems, attitudes of wisdom</i> and <i>respectful interaction</i> - heuristically guide the exploration of on-the-ground experiences and informal ways GPs and their at-risk patients sought to ensure continuity of primary care. GPs used their metaphorical Swiss army knives of learned tools as well as existing knowledge and relationships to adapt to the extenuating circumstances. Through <i>improvisation,</i> GPs and patients found pragmatic solutions, such as using local farmer apple brandy as disinfectant or at-home treatments of clavicle fractures. Through <i>virtual role systems</i>, GPs and patients came to terms with new and shifting roles, such as \"good soldier\" and \"at-risk patient\" categorizations. Both parties adopted <i>attitudes of wisdom</i> by accepting that they could not know everything. They also diversified their sources of information through personal relationships, formal networks, and the internet. The GP-patient relationship grew in importance through <i>respectful interaction</i>, and intersubjective reflection helped make sense of shifting roles and ambiguous guidelines. The empirical analysis of this paper contributes to theoretical considerations of sensemaking, resilience, crisis settings and health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"346-361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2023.2269523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In early 2020, when the first COVID-19 cases were confirmed in Switzerland, the federal government started implementing measures such as national stay-at-home recommendations and a strict limitation of health care services use. General practitioners (GPs) and their at-risk patients faced similar uncertainties and grappled with subsequent sensemaking of the unprecedented situation. Qualitative interviews with 24 GPs and 37 at-risk patients were conducted which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Weick's (1993) four sources of -resilience - improvisation, virtual role systems, attitudes of wisdom and respectful interaction - heuristically guide the exploration of on-the-ground experiences and informal ways GPs and their at-risk patients sought to ensure continuity of primary care. GPs used their metaphorical Swiss army knives of learned tools as well as existing knowledge and relationships to adapt to the extenuating circumstances. Through improvisation, GPs and patients found pragmatic solutions, such as using local farmer apple brandy as disinfectant or at-home treatments of clavicle fractures. Through virtual role systems, GPs and patients came to terms with new and shifting roles, such as "good soldier" and "at-risk patient" categorizations. Both parties adopted attitudes of wisdom by accepting that they could not know everything. They also diversified their sources of information through personal relationships, formal networks, and the internet. The GP-patient relationship grew in importance through respectful interaction, and intersubjective reflection helped make sense of shifting roles and ambiguous guidelines. The empirical analysis of this paper contributes to theoretical considerations of sensemaking, resilience, crisis settings and health systems.

骨折和苹果白兰地:瑞士 COVID-19 大流行期间全科医生及其高危病人的复原力和感知力。
2020 年初,当瑞士确诊首例 COVID-19 病例时,联邦政府开始实施一些措施,如建议国民留在家中,严格限制医疗服务的使用。全科医生(GPs)和他们的高危患者也面临着类似的不确定性,并努力对这一前所未有的情况进行后续感知。我们对 24 名全科医生和 37 名高危患者进行了定性访谈,并采用主题分析法对访谈内容进行了分析。韦克(1993 年)提出了四种 "复原力 "来源--即兴发挥、虚拟角色系统、智慧态度和相互尊重--启发式地指导了对全科医生及其高危患者的实地经验和非正式方式的探索,以确保初级保健的连续性。全科医生利用他们的瑞士军刀、所学工具以及现有知识和关系来适应紧急情况。通过即兴发挥,全科医生和患者找到了实用的解决方案,例如使用当地农民的苹果白兰地作为消毒剂,或在家中治疗锁骨骨折。通过虚拟角色系统,全科医生和病人接受了新的和不断变化的角色,如 "优秀士兵 "和 "高危病人 "的分类。双方都采取了智慧的态度,承认自己不可能知道一切。他们还通过人际关系、正式网络和互联网等途径使信息来源多样化。通过相互尊重的互动,全科医生与患者的关系变得越来越重要,而主体间的反思则有助于理解角色的转变和模糊的指导方针。本文的实证分析有助于对感性认识、复原力、危机环境和医疗系统进行理论思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信