Bodily sensations and bariatric surgery: Links between interoceptive sensibility, intuitive and disordered eating behaviour in obesity and obesity surgery
IF 4.3 3区 材料科学Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Vrutti Joshi, Pierluigi Graziani, Jonathan Del-Monte
{"title":"Bodily sensations and bariatric surgery: Links between interoceptive sensibility, intuitive and disordered eating behaviour in obesity and obesity surgery","authors":"Vrutti Joshi, Pierluigi Graziani, Jonathan Del-Monte","doi":"10.1002/erv.3066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated interoceptive sensibility, intuitive and disordered eating among bariatric candidates, operated individuals and individuals with obesity seeking non-surgical treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We recruited 57 individuals with obesity seeking nonsurgical weight-loss (IOB), 84 bariatric candidates (Pre) and 22 individuals post-bariatric surgery (Post) who responded to questionnaires: Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2), Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire, Binge Eating Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck's Depression Inventory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, the Post group manifested higher scores on ‘Body-Listening’ (<i>F</i> = 4.95, <i>p</i> = 0.01), ‘Emotional Awareness’ (<i>F</i> = 8.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and ‘Trusting’ (<i>F</i> = 6.71, <i>p</i> = 0.002) interoceptive dimensions, on the IES-2 total score (<i>F</i> = 5.48, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and ‘Reliance on hunger and satiety cues’ (<i>F</i> = 31.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001) when age was controlled. The IOB group presented higher scores on emotional (<i>F</i> = 3.23, <i>p</i> = 0.047) and binge eating (<i>F</i> = 5.99, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Among operated individuals, intuitive eating mediated the relationship between interoceptive sensibility dimensions and binge eating: ‘Attention regulation’ (54%) ‘Self-regulation’ (75.1%), ‘Body listening’ (94.09%) and ‘Trusting’ (84.9%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggest the therapeutic potential of interoceptive sensibility and intuitive eating in obesity management in/beyond the bariatric context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study evaluated interoceptive sensibility, intuitive and disordered eating among bariatric candidates, operated individuals and individuals with obesity seeking non-surgical treatment.
Method
We recruited 57 individuals with obesity seeking nonsurgical weight-loss (IOB), 84 bariatric candidates (Pre) and 22 individuals post-bariatric surgery (Post) who responded to questionnaires: Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2), Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire, Binge Eating Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck's Depression Inventory.
Results
Overall, the Post group manifested higher scores on ‘Body-Listening’ (F = 4.95, p = 0.01), ‘Emotional Awareness’ (F = 8.83, p < 0.001) and ‘Trusting’ (F = 6.71, p = 0.002) interoceptive dimensions, on the IES-2 total score (F = 5.48, p = 0.007) and ‘Reliance on hunger and satiety cues’ (F = 31.3, p < 0.001) when age was controlled. The IOB group presented higher scores on emotional (F = 3.23, p = 0.047) and binge eating (F = 5.99, p = 0.004). Among operated individuals, intuitive eating mediated the relationship between interoceptive sensibility dimensions and binge eating: ‘Attention regulation’ (54%) ‘Self-regulation’ (75.1%), ‘Body listening’ (94.09%) and ‘Trusting’ (84.9%).
Conclusions
Our results suggest the therapeutic potential of interoceptive sensibility and intuitive eating in obesity management in/beyond the bariatric context.