Validation of a novel algorithm with a high specificity in ruling out MDS

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Felicitas Schulz, Kathrin Nachtkamp, Howard S. Oster, Moshe Mittelman, Norbert Gattermann, Sarah Schweier, Carmen Barthuber, Ulrich Germing
{"title":"Validation of a novel algorithm with a high specificity in ruling out MDS","authors":"Felicitas Schulz,&nbsp;Kathrin Nachtkamp,&nbsp;Howard S. Oster,&nbsp;Moshe Mittelman,&nbsp;Norbert Gattermann,&nbsp;Sarah Schweier,&nbsp;Carmen Barthuber,&nbsp;Ulrich Germing","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A previously published web-based App using Gradient-boosted models (GBMs) of eight laboratory parameters was established by Oster et al. to facilitate diagnosis or exclusion of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To validate their algorithm, we compared 175 anemic patients with MDS diagnosis from our German MDS Registry with 1378 non-MDS anemic patients who consulted various specialties in the Düsseldorf university hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on hemoglobin level, leukocyte and platelet count, mean corpuscular volume, absolute neutrophil count, absolute monocyte count, glucose and creatinine, plus the patients' gender and age, we could not reproduce a high negative predictive value (NPV), but confirmed a useful specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.1%. 1192 of 1378 controls were correctly categorized as “probably not MDS (pnMDS)” patients. A total of 65 patients were wrongly classified as “probable MDS (pMDS),” of whom 48 had alternative explanations for their altered laboratory results. In a second analysis, we included 29 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) resulting in only one label as possible MDS, suggesting that highly proliferative bone marrow disorders are correctly excluded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The possibility of reliably excluding MDS from differential diagnosis based on peripheral blood lab work appears to be attractive for patients and physicians alike while the confirmation of MDS diagnosis still requires a bone marrow biopsy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14234","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A previously published web-based App using Gradient-boosted models (GBMs) of eight laboratory parameters was established by Oster et al. to facilitate diagnosis or exclusion of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in patients.

Methods

To validate their algorithm, we compared 175 anemic patients with MDS diagnosis from our German MDS Registry with 1378 non-MDS anemic patients who consulted various specialties in the Düsseldorf university hospital.

Results

Based on hemoglobin level, leukocyte and platelet count, mean corpuscular volume, absolute neutrophil count, absolute monocyte count, glucose and creatinine, plus the patients' gender and age, we could not reproduce a high negative predictive value (NPV), but confirmed a useful specificity of 90.9% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 77.1%. 1192 of 1378 controls were correctly categorized as “probably not MDS (pnMDS)” patients. A total of 65 patients were wrongly classified as “probable MDS (pMDS),” of whom 48 had alternative explanations for their altered laboratory results. In a second analysis, we included 29 patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) resulting in only one label as possible MDS, suggesting that highly proliferative bone marrow disorders are correctly excluded.

Conclusion

The possibility of reliably excluding MDS from differential diagnosis based on peripheral blood lab work appears to be attractive for patients and physicians alike while the confirmation of MDS diagnosis still requires a bone marrow biopsy.

Abstract Image

验证一种新型算法,该算法在排除 MDS 方面具有很高的特异性。
简介奥斯特(Oster)等人利用梯度增强模型(Gradient-boosted models,GBMs)建立了一个基于网络的应用程序,用于诊断或排除骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者:为了验证他们的算法,我们将德国 MDS 登记处的 175 名确诊为 MDS 的贫血患者与杜塞尔多夫大学医院各专科就诊的 1378 名非 MDS 贫血患者进行了比较:根据血红蛋白水平、白细胞和血小板计数、平均血球容积、中性粒细胞绝对计数、单核细胞绝对计数、血糖和肌酐以及患者的性别和年龄,我们无法再现较高的阴性预测值 (NPV),但确认了 90.9% 的有用特异性和 77.1% 的阳性预测值 (PPV)。1378 例对照中,有 1192 例被正确归类为 "可能不是 MDS(pnMDS)"患者。共有 65 名患者被错误地归类为 "可能是 MDS (pMDS)",其中 48 名患者的实验室结果改变有其他解释。在第二项分析中,我们纳入了 29 名慢性粒细胞白血病(CMML)患者,结果只有一名患者被标记为可能的 MDS,这表明高度增生性骨髓疾病被正确排除:结论:根据外周血化验结果从鉴别诊断中可靠排除 MDS 的可能性似乎对患者和医生都很有吸引力,但 MDS 的确诊仍需要骨髓活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信