Morphological differences between the first and second maxillary premolar crowns: A three-dimensional surface homologous modeling analysis

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Julie Miyazaki , Shintaro Kondo , Toyohisa Tanijiri , Shinichi Negishi
{"title":"Morphological differences between the first and second maxillary premolar crowns: A three-dimensional surface homologous modeling analysis","authors":"Julie Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Shintaro Kondo ,&nbsp;Toyohisa Tanijiri ,&nbsp;Shinichi Negishi","doi":"10.1016/j.job.2024.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The current study used a three-dimensional (3D) surface homologous modeling to analyze the structure of maxillary first premolar (P<sup>1</sup>) and second premolar (P<sup>2</sup>) crowns, to identify any morphological differences between them, particularly in their cuspal structures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study sample comprised 27 male elementary and junior high school students from Chiba Prefecture, Japan. Plaster casts were collected and the 3D coordinates were used to measure the crown structures. Thereafter, principal component (PC) analysis was carried out using the 3D coordinates of the homologous models, containing 4498 anatomical data points, including 9 landmarks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings indicated that P<sup>1</sup> was significantly larger than P<sup>2</sup>, despite both teeth exhibiting similar intercuspal distances. The homologous model analysis revealed that 61.5 % of the total variance could be explained up to the fourth PC. Overall size and shape in the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions were estimated using PC1 and PC2, respectively. Both components highlighted a shape factor, indicating that the buccal cusp was more well-developed than the lingual cusp in P<sup>1</sup> compared to P<sup>2</sup>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The variations in the size of the mesial and distal premolar teeth and the relationships between the cusps in the completed tooth crowns can be explained using molecular biology developmental models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Biosciences","volume":"66 1","pages":"Pages 20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1349007924000100/pdfft?md5=26ae6c6648a1da20e7de50bd85536f97&pid=1-s2.0-S1349007924000100-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1349007924000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The current study used a three-dimensional (3D) surface homologous modeling to analyze the structure of maxillary first premolar (P1) and second premolar (P2) crowns, to identify any morphological differences between them, particularly in their cuspal structures.

Methods

The study sample comprised 27 male elementary and junior high school students from Chiba Prefecture, Japan. Plaster casts were collected and the 3D coordinates were used to measure the crown structures. Thereafter, principal component (PC) analysis was carried out using the 3D coordinates of the homologous models, containing 4498 anatomical data points, including 9 landmarks.

Results

The findings indicated that P1 was significantly larger than P2, despite both teeth exhibiting similar intercuspal distances. The homologous model analysis revealed that 61.5 % of the total variance could be explained up to the fourth PC. Overall size and shape in the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions were estimated using PC1 and PC2, respectively. Both components highlighted a shape factor, indicating that the buccal cusp was more well-developed than the lingual cusp in P1 compared to P2.

Conclusions

The variations in the size of the mesial and distal premolar teeth and the relationships between the cusps in the completed tooth crowns can be explained using molecular biology developmental models.

Abstract Image

上颌第一和第二前磨牙牙冠的形态差异:三维表面同源建模分析。
研究目的本研究使用三维(3D)表面同源建模分析上颌第一前磨牙(P1)和第二前磨牙(P2)牙冠的结构,以确定它们之间的形态差异,尤其是尖牙结构的差异:研究样本包括来自日本千叶县的 27 名小学和初中男生。采集石膏模型并使用三维坐标测量牙冠结构。之后,使用同源模型的三维坐标进行主成分(PC)分析,其中包含 4498 个解剖数据点,包括 9 个地标:结果:研究结果表明,尽管两颗牙齿的齿间距离相似,但 P1 明显大于 P2。同源模型分析表明,61.5%的总方差可以用第四个PC来解释。中轴方向和颊舌方向的整体大小和形状分别由 PC1 和 PC2 估算。这两个成分都突出了一个形状因子,表明与 P2 相比,P1 中的颊尖比舌尖更发达:结论:分子生物学发育模型可以解释前臼齿中、远端的大小变化以及完整牙冠中尖牙之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Biosciences
Journal of Oral Biosciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
37 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信