Optimization and validation of a suprasystolic brachial cuff-based method for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xujie Zhang, Yue Wang, Zhaofang Yin, Fuyou Liang
{"title":"Optimization and validation of a suprasystolic brachial cuff-based method for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure","authors":"Xujie Zhang,&nbsp;Yue Wang,&nbsp;Zhaofang Yin,&nbsp;Fuyou Liang","doi":"10.1002/cnm.3806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinical studies have extensively demonstrated that central aortic blood pressure (CABP) has greater clinical significance in comparison with peripheral blood pressure. Despite the existence of various techniques for noninvasively measuring CABP, the clinical applications of most techniques are hampered by the unsatisfactory accuracy or large variability in measurement errors. In this study, we proposed a new method for noninvasively estimating CABP with improved accuracy and reduced uncertain errors. The main idea was to optimize the estimation of the pulse wave transit time from the aorta to the occluded lumen of the brachial artery under a suprasystolic cuff by identifying and utilizing the characteristic information of the cuff oscillation wave, thereby improving the accuracy and stability of the CABP estimation algorithms under various physiological conditions. The method was firstly developed and verified based on large-scale virtual subject data (<i>n</i> = 800) generated by a computational model of the cardiovascular system coupled to a brachial cuff, and then validated with small-scale in vivo data (<i>n</i> = 34). The estimation errors for the aortic systolic pressure were −0.05 ± 0.63 mmHg in the test group of the virtual subjects and −1.09 ± 3.70 mmHg in the test group of the patients, both demonstrating a good performance. In particular, the estimation errors were found to be insensitive to variations in hemodynamic conditions and cardiovascular properties, manifesting the high robustness of the method. The method may have promising clinical applicability, although further validation studies with larger-scale clinical data remain necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical studies have extensively demonstrated that central aortic blood pressure (CABP) has greater clinical significance in comparison with peripheral blood pressure. Despite the existence of various techniques for noninvasively measuring CABP, the clinical applications of most techniques are hampered by the unsatisfactory accuracy or large variability in measurement errors. In this study, we proposed a new method for noninvasively estimating CABP with improved accuracy and reduced uncertain errors. The main idea was to optimize the estimation of the pulse wave transit time from the aorta to the occluded lumen of the brachial artery under a suprasystolic cuff by identifying and utilizing the characteristic information of the cuff oscillation wave, thereby improving the accuracy and stability of the CABP estimation algorithms under various physiological conditions. The method was firstly developed and verified based on large-scale virtual subject data (n = 800) generated by a computational model of the cardiovascular system coupled to a brachial cuff, and then validated with small-scale in vivo data (n = 34). The estimation errors for the aortic systolic pressure were −0.05 ± 0.63 mmHg in the test group of the virtual subjects and −1.09 ± 3.70 mmHg in the test group of the patients, both demonstrating a good performance. In particular, the estimation errors were found to be insensitive to variations in hemodynamic conditions and cardiovascular properties, manifesting the high robustness of the method. The method may have promising clinical applicability, although further validation studies with larger-scale clinical data remain necessary.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化和验证基于收缩上臂式袖带的无创中心主动脉血压估算方法。
临床研究广泛表明,与外周血压相比,中心主动脉血压(CABP)具有更重要的临床意义。尽管目前已有多种无创测量 CABP 的技术,但大多数技术的临床应用都因测量误差的准确性不理想或变化较大而受到阻碍。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种无创估测 CABP 的新方法,该方法可提高准确性并减少不确定误差。其主要思路是通过识别和利用袖带振荡波的特征信息,优化收缩上行袖带下主动脉到肱动脉闭塞腔的脉搏波传输时间的估计,从而提高各种生理条件下 CABP 估计算法的准确性和稳定性。该方法首先基于与肱动脉袖带耦合的心血管系统计算模型生成的大规模虚拟受试者数据(n = 800)进行了开发和验证,然后用小规模活体数据(n = 34)进行了验证。虚拟受试者测试组的主动脉收缩压估计误差为-0.05 ± 0.63 mmHg,患者测试组的主动脉收缩压估计误差为-1.09 ± 3.70 mmHg,均表现出良好的性能。特别是,估计误差对血流动力学条件和心血管特性的变化不敏感,体现了该方法的高鲁棒性。尽管仍有必要使用更大规模的临床数据进行进一步的验证研究,但该方法的临床应用前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信