Preliminary outcomes of drainless videothoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection procedure from Turkey.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.5114/kitp.2023.134136
Muhammet Sayan, Irmak Akarsu, Muhammet Tarik Aslan, Aysegul Kurtoglu, Gunel Ahmadova, Ali Celik
{"title":"Preliminary outcomes of drainless videothoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection procedure from Turkey.","authors":"Muhammet Sayan, Irmak Akarsu, Muhammet Tarik Aslan, Aysegul Kurtoglu, Gunel Ahmadova, Ali Celik","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2023.134136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A chest tube inserted through the intercostal space for air and blood evacuation after thoracic surgery is a serious cause of postoperative pain and prolongs the length of stay. Drainless video-assisted thoracoscopic thoracic surgical procedures, which were previously performed in mediastinal surgical procedures, have also been applied for lung resections in recent years.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the superiority of drainless videothoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection over those with a drain in terms of postoperative pain and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary wedge resection between December 2022 and May 2023 in our department were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, operation indication, postoperative complication, number of wedge resections, visual pain score, and length of hospital stay data were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: drainless and with-drain. The existence of differences or correlations between groups was investigated by the Pearson χ<sup>2</sup>, student' <i>t</i>-test, or Mann-Whitney-<i>U</i> test according to type or distribution of data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients were included in the study. There were 14 patients in the drainless group and 21 in the with-drain group. Postoperative pain score and length of stay were significantly lower in the drainless group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, presence of complications, or number of wedge resections (<i>p</i> > 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Drainless VATS pulmonary wedge resections are safe methods that offer less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays compared to with-drain methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":"20 4","pages":"228-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10809804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.134136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A chest tube inserted through the intercostal space for air and blood evacuation after thoracic surgery is a serious cause of postoperative pain and prolongs the length of stay. Drainless video-assisted thoracoscopic thoracic surgical procedures, which were previously performed in mediastinal surgical procedures, have also been applied for lung resections in recent years.

Aim: To investigate the superiority of drainless videothoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection over those with a drain in terms of postoperative pain and length of stay.

Material and methods: Data of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary wedge resection between December 2022 and May 2023 in our department were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, operation indication, postoperative complication, number of wedge resections, visual pain score, and length of hospital stay data were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: drainless and with-drain. The existence of differences or correlations between groups was investigated by the Pearson χ2, student' t-test, or Mann-Whitney-U test according to type or distribution of data.

Results: A total of 35 patients were included in the study. There were 14 patients in the drainless group and 21 in the with-drain group. Postoperative pain score and length of stay were significantly lower in the drainless group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, presence of complications, or number of wedge resections (p > 0.5).

Conclusions: Drainless VATS pulmonary wedge resections are safe methods that offer less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays compared to with-drain methods.

土耳其无引流管视频胸腔镜肺楔形切除术的初步结果。
导言:胸腔手术后通过肋间隙插入胸管进行排气和排血是造成术后疼痛和延长住院时间的严重原因。目的:研究无引流管视频胸腔镜肺楔形切除术在术后疼痛和住院时间方面优于有引流管的手术:回顾性分析 2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在我科接受视频辅助胸腔镜(VATS)肺楔形切除术的患者数据。收集了患者的年龄、性别、手术指征、术后并发症、楔形切除次数、视觉疼痛评分和住院时间等数据。患者被分为两组:无引流管组和有引流管组。根据数据类型或分布情况,采用皮尔逊χ2、学生 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney-U 检验来研究组间是否存在差异或相关性:研究共纳入 35 名患者。无引流管组有 14 名患者,有引流管组有 21 名患者。无引流管组的术后疼痛评分和住院时间明显更短(P < 0.001)。两组患者在年龄、性别、并发症发生率或楔形切除次数方面无明显差异(P > 0.5):无引流VATS肺楔形切除术是一种安全的方法,与有引流方法相比,术后疼痛更轻,住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信