Tracing carbon and nitrogen reserve remobilization during spring leaf flush and growth following defoliation.

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Ashley T Hart, Simon M Landhäusser, Erin Wiley
{"title":"Tracing carbon and nitrogen reserve remobilization during spring leaf flush and growth following defoliation.","authors":"Ashley T Hart, Simon M Landhäusser, Erin Wiley","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpae015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Woody plants rely on the remobilization of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) reserves to support growth and survival when resource demand exceeds supply at seasonally predictable times like spring leaf flush and following unpredictable disturbances like defoliation. However, we have a poor understanding of how reserves are regulated and whether distance between source and sink tissues affects remobilization. This leads to uncertainty about which reserves-and how much-are available to support plant functions like leaf growth. To better understand the source of remobilized reserves and constraints on their allocation, we created aspen saplings with organ-specific labeled reserves by using stable isotopes (13C,15N) and grafting unlabeled or labeled stems to labeled or unlabeled root stocks. We first determined which organs had imported root or stem-derived C and N reserves after spring leaf flush. We then further tested spatial and temporal variation in reserve remobilization and import by comparing (i) upper and lower canopy leaves, (ii) early and late leaves, and (iii) early flush and re-flush leaves after defoliation. During spring flush, remobilized root C and N reserves were preferentially allocated to sinks closer to the reserve source (i.e., lower vs upper canopy leaves). However, the reduced import of 13C in late versus early leaves indicates reliance on C reserves declined over time. Following defoliation, re-flush leaves imported the same proportion of root N as spring flush leaves, but they imported a lower proportion of root C. This lower import of reserve C suggests that, after defoliation, leaf re-flush rely more heavily on current photosynthate, which may explain the reduced leaf mass recovery of re-flush canopies (31% of initial leaf mass). The reduced reliance on reserves occurred even though roots retained significant starch concentrations (~5% dry wt), suggesting that aspen prioritizes the maintenance of root reserves at the expense of fast canopy recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":"145-157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Woody plants rely on the remobilization of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) reserves to support growth and survival when resource demand exceeds supply at seasonally predictable times like spring leaf flush and following unpredictable disturbances like defoliation. However, we have a poor understanding of how reserves are regulated and whether distance between source and sink tissues affects remobilization. This leads to uncertainty about which reserves-and how much-are available to support plant functions like leaf growth. To better understand the source of remobilized reserves and constraints on their allocation, we created aspen saplings with organ-specific labeled reserves by using stable isotopes (13C,15N) and grafting unlabeled or labeled stems to labeled or unlabeled root stocks. We first determined which organs had imported root or stem-derived C and N reserves after spring leaf flush. We then further tested spatial and temporal variation in reserve remobilization and import by comparing (i) upper and lower canopy leaves, (ii) early and late leaves, and (iii) early flush and re-flush leaves after defoliation. During spring flush, remobilized root C and N reserves were preferentially allocated to sinks closer to the reserve source (i.e., lower vs upper canopy leaves). However, the reduced import of 13C in late versus early leaves indicates reliance on C reserves declined over time. Following defoliation, re-flush leaves imported the same proportion of root N as spring flush leaves, but they imported a lower proportion of root C. This lower import of reserve C suggests that, after defoliation, leaf re-flush rely more heavily on current photosynthate, which may explain the reduced leaf mass recovery of re-flush canopies (31% of initial leaf mass). The reduced reliance on reserves occurred even though roots retained significant starch concentrations (~5% dry wt), suggesting that aspen prioritizes the maintenance of root reserves at the expense of fast canopy recovery.

追踪春季落叶和落叶后生长过程中碳和氮储备的再动员。
当资源供不应求时,木本植物依靠碳(C)和氮(N)储备的再动员来支持生长和存活,这种情况在春季落叶潮等季节性可预测的时期以及落叶等不可预测的干扰之后都会出现。然而,我们对储备如何调节以及源组织和吸收汇组织之间的距离是否会影响再动员还知之甚少。这导致我们无法确定哪些储备--以及有多少储备--可用于支持叶片生长等植物功能。为了更好地了解再动员储备的来源及其分配限制,我们使用稳定同位素(13C,15N)并将未标记或已标记的茎嫁接到已标记或未标记的根茎上,培育出具有器官特异性标记储备的杨树树苗。我们首先确定了哪些器官在春季落叶后进口了源于根或茎的碳和氮储备。然后,我们通过比较:1)冠层上部和下部叶片;2)早期和晚期叶片;3)落叶后早期冲洗叶片和再冲洗叶片,进一步测试了储备再动员和输入的时空变化。在春季冲洗期间,再动员的根部碳和氮储备被优先分配到更靠近储备源的汇中(即树冠下部叶片与树冠上部叶片)。然而,后期叶片与早期叶片相比,13C 的输入量减少,这表明对 C 储备的依赖性随着时间的推移而下降。落叶后,再冲洗叶片输入的根氮素比例与春季冲洗叶片相同,但它们输入的根碳素比例较低。这种较低的储备碳素输入表明,落叶后,再冲洗叶片更依赖于当前的光合作用,这也许可以解释为什么再冲洗树冠的叶片质量恢复较低(初始叶片质量的 31%)。即使根部保留了大量的淀粉浓度(约 5% 干重),对储备的依赖仍然减少,这表明杨树优先考虑维持根部储备,而牺牲了树冠的快速恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信