Sex differences in trends and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with mechanical complications in the United States.

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frederick Berro Rivera, Faye Salva, Jacques Simon Gonzales, Sung Whoy Cha, Samantha Tang, Grace Nooriza Opay Lumbang, Gurleen Kaur, Isabel Planek, Kyla Lara-Breitinger, Mark Dela Cruz, Tisha Marie B Suboc, Fareed Moses S Collado, Jonathan R Enriquez, Nishant Shah, Annabelle Santos Volgman
{"title":"Sex differences in trends and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with mechanical complications in the United States.","authors":"Frederick Berro Rivera, Faye Salva, Jacques Simon Gonzales, Sung Whoy Cha, Samantha Tang, Grace Nooriza Opay Lumbang, Gurleen Kaur, Isabel Planek, Kyla Lara-Breitinger, Mark Dela Cruz, Tisha Marie B Suboc, Fareed Moses S Collado, Jonathan R Enriquez, Nishant Shah, Annabelle Santos Volgman","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2024.2311707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical complications (MC) are rare but significant sequelae of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Current data on sex differences in AMI with MC is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the National Inpatient Sample database to identify adult patients with the primary diagnosis of AMI and MC. The main outcome of interest was sex difference in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were sex differences in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), major bleeding, use of inotropes, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI), performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), surgery (VSD repair and MV surgery), pericardiocentesis, use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), ischemic stroke, and mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among AMI-MC cohort, in-hospital mortality was higher among females compared to males (41.24% vs 28.13%: aOR 1.39. 95% CI 1.079-1.798; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Among those who had VSD, females also had higher in-hospital mortality compared to males (56.7% vs 43.1%: aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.12-2.69; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Females were less likely to receive CABG compared to males (12.03% vs 20%: aOR 0.49 95% CI 0.345-0.690; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the decreasing trend in AMI admission, females had higher risk of MC and associated mortality. Significant sex disparities still exist in AMI treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2311707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical complications (MC) are rare but significant sequelae of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Current data on sex differences in AMI with MC is limited.

Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample database to identify adult patients with the primary diagnosis of AMI and MC. The main outcome of interest was sex difference in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were sex differences in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), major bleeding, use of inotropes, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI), performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), surgery (VSD repair and MV surgery), pericardiocentesis, use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), ischemic stroke, and mechanical ventilation.

Results: Among AMI-MC cohort, in-hospital mortality was higher among females compared to males (41.24% vs 28.13%: aOR 1.39. 95% CI 1.079-1.798; p = 0.01). Among those who had VSD, females also had higher in-hospital mortality compared to males (56.7% vs 43.1%: aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.12-2.69; p = 0.01). Females were less likely to receive CABG compared to males (12.03% vs 20%: aOR 0.49 95% CI 0.345-0.690; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Despite the decreasing trend in AMI admission, females had higher risk of MC and associated mortality. Significant sex disparities still exist in AMI treatment.

美国急性心肌梗死并发机械性并发症的趋势和结果的性别差异。
背景:机械性并发症(MC)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)罕见但重要的后遗症。目前有关急性心肌梗死合并机械性并发症的性别差异的数据很有限:我们查询了全国住院患者抽样数据库,以确定主要诊断为急性心肌梗死和机械性并发症的成年患者。我们关注的主要结果是院内死亡率的性别差异。次要结果是急性肾损伤(AKI)、大出血、肌力药物使用、永久起搏器植入(PPMI)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、手术(VSD修补术和中风手术)、心包穿刺术、机械循环支持(MCS)、缺血性中风和机械通气发生率的性别差异:在 AMI-MC 队列中,女性的院内死亡率高于男性(41.24% vs 28.13%:aOR 1.39. 95% CI 1.079-1.798; p = 0.01)。在患有 VSD 的患者中,女性的院内死亡率也高于男性(56.7% vs 43.1%:aOR 1.74,95% CI 1.12 - 2.69;p = 0.01)。与男性相比,女性接受 CABG 的几率较低(12.03% vs 20%:aOR 0.49 95% CI 0.345-0.690;P 结论:尽管急性心肌梗死入院率呈下降趋势,但女性接受 CABG 的几率仍然较高:尽管急性心肌梗死的入院率呈下降趋势,但女性患 MC 的风险更高,相关死亡率也更高。急性心肌梗死治疗中仍存在显著的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信