Understanding how algorithmic injustice leads to making discriminatory decisions: An obedience to authority perspective

IF 8.2 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Maryam Ghasemaghaei , Nima Kordzadeh
{"title":"Understanding how algorithmic injustice leads to making discriminatory decisions: An obedience to authority perspective","authors":"Maryam Ghasemaghaei ,&nbsp;Nima Kordzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2024.103921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unjust algorithmic recommendations can lead decision makers to discriminatory choices, risking harm to individuals or groups. This study addresses this concerning phenomenon and examines its implications. In an experimental study involving 122 managers, we found that algorithmic injustice causes discriminatory decisions without heightened guilt perception. Additionally, trust in data analytics outcomes moderates the impact of algorithmic injustice on discrimination and marginally influences the impact of discriminatory decision making on guilt perception. However, displacement of responsibility has no moderating effect on either relationship. These findings highlight the potential negative consequences of algorithmic decision making, emphasizing the need for caution and awareness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"61 2","pages":"Article 103921"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037872062400003X/pdfft?md5=11da5eb555338e6da41824f658de3974&pid=1-s2.0-S037872062400003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037872062400003X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unjust algorithmic recommendations can lead decision makers to discriminatory choices, risking harm to individuals or groups. This study addresses this concerning phenomenon and examines its implications. In an experimental study involving 122 managers, we found that algorithmic injustice causes discriminatory decisions without heightened guilt perception. Additionally, trust in data analytics outcomes moderates the impact of algorithmic injustice on discrimination and marginally influences the impact of discriminatory decision making on guilt perception. However, displacement of responsibility has no moderating effect on either relationship. These findings highlight the potential negative consequences of algorithmic decision making, emphasizing the need for caution and awareness.

理解算法不公正如何导致做出歧视性决定:服从权威的视角
不公正的算法建议可能会导致决策者做出歧视性选择,给个人或群体带来伤害风险。本研究探讨了这一令人担忧的现象,并研究了其影响。在一项有 122 名管理人员参与的实验研究中,我们发现算法不公正会导致歧视性决策,但并不会增加内疚感。此外,对数据分析结果的信任会调节算法不公正对歧视的影响,并在一定程度上影响歧视性决策对内疚感的影响。然而,责任转移对这两种关系都没有调节作用。这些发现凸显了算法决策的潜在负面影响,表明有必要保持谨慎并提高认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information & Management
Information & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信