Person-specific priorities in solitude.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Dongning Ren, Wen Wei Loh, Joanne M Chung, Mark J Brandt
{"title":"Person-specific priorities in solitude.","authors":"Dongning Ren, Wen Wei Loh, Joanne M Chung, Mark J Brandt","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People value solitude in varying degrees. Theories and studies suggest that people's appreciation of solitude varies considerably across persons (e.g., an introverted person may value solitude more than an extraverted person), and solitude experiences (i.e., on average, people may value some functions of solitude, e.g., privacy, more than other functions, e.g., self-discovery). What are the unique contributions of these two sources?</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We surveyed a quota-based sample of 501 US residents about their perceived importance of a diverse set of 22 solitude functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variance component analysis reveals that both sources contributed to the variability of perceived importance of solitude (person: 22%; solitude function: 15%). Crucially, individual idiosyncratic preferences (person-by-solitude function interaction) had a substantial impact (46%). Further analyses explored the role of personality traits, showing that different functions of solitude hold varying importance for different people. For example, neurotic individuals prioritize emotion regulation, introverted individuals value relaxation, and conscientious individuals find solitude important for productivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People value solitude for idiosyncratic reasons. Scientific inquiries on solitude must consider the fit between a person's characteristics and the specific functions a solitary experience affords. This research suggests that crafting or enhancing positive solitude experiences requires a personalized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: People value solitude in varying degrees. Theories and studies suggest that people's appreciation of solitude varies considerably across persons (e.g., an introverted person may value solitude more than an extraverted person), and solitude experiences (i.e., on average, people may value some functions of solitude, e.g., privacy, more than other functions, e.g., self-discovery). What are the unique contributions of these two sources?

Method: We surveyed a quota-based sample of 501 US residents about their perceived importance of a diverse set of 22 solitude functions.

Results: Variance component analysis reveals that both sources contributed to the variability of perceived importance of solitude (person: 22%; solitude function: 15%). Crucially, individual idiosyncratic preferences (person-by-solitude function interaction) had a substantial impact (46%). Further analyses explored the role of personality traits, showing that different functions of solitude hold varying importance for different people. For example, neurotic individuals prioritize emotion regulation, introverted individuals value relaxation, and conscientious individuals find solitude important for productivity.

Conclusions: People value solitude for idiosyncratic reasons. Scientific inquiries on solitude must consider the fit between a person's characteristics and the specific functions a solitary experience affords. This research suggests that crafting or enhancing positive solitude experiences requires a personalized approach.

独处时针对个人的优先事项。
目的:人们对独处的重视程度各不相同。理论和研究表明,不同的人对独处的欣赏程度有很大差异(例如,内向的人可能比外向的人更重视独处),独处经历也有很大差异(即平均而言,人们可能更重视独处的某些功能,如隐私,而不是其他功能,如自我发现)。这两个来源的独特贡献是什么?我们对 501 位美国居民进行了配额抽样调查,了解他们对 22 项独处功能的重要性的看法:方差成分分析表明,这两个来源都对感知到的独处重要性的变化做出了贡献(个人:22%;独处功能:15%)。最重要的是,个人的特异偏好(人与独处功能的交互作用)产生了很大影响(46%)。进一步的分析探讨了人格特质的作用,结果表明不同的独处功能对不同的人具有不同的重要性。例如,神经质的人优先考虑情绪调节,内向的人重视放松,而认真负责的人则认为独处对工作效率很重要:结论:人们重视独处的原因各不相同。对独处的科学研究必须考虑一个人的特点与独处体验所提供的特定功能之间的契合点。这项研究表明,创造或增强积极的独处体验需要个性化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信