Association between placental location and cord insertion site with pre-eclampsia: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1080/14767058.2024.2306189
Oyoung Kim, Subeen Hong, In Yang Park, Hyun Sun Ko
{"title":"Association between placental location and cord insertion site with pre-eclampsia: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Oyoung Kim, Subeen Hong, In Yang Park, Hyun Sun Ko","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2306189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The relationship between placental location in pregnancies without previa and adverse pregnancy outcomes has not been well studied. Additionally, the impact of abnormal cord insertion sites remains controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the adverse outcomes associated with placental location and abnormal cord insertion in nulliparous women and to assess their impact on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital between January 2019 and June 2022. The study included nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies who delivered live infants and had available data on placental location and umbilical cord insertion site from a second- or third-trimester ultrasound. Placental location was categorized as anterior or posterior using transabdominal ultrasonography. The association between placental location/cord insertion site and pre-eclampsia was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. We compared the area under the curve to evaluate the impact of placental location and cord insertion site on pre-eclampsia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2219 pregnancies were included in the study. Pre-eclampsia occurred significantly more frequently in the anterior group than in the posterior group (8.21% vs. 3.04%, <i>p</i> < .001). In multivariate analysis investigating the association between placental location and pre-eclampsia, anterior placenta and marginal cord insertion showed increased odds ratios for pre-eclampsia of 3.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-6.58) and 3.64 (95% CI 1.90-6.97), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to predict pre-eclampsia using independent factors from multivariate analyses. Model I, including maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, <i>in vitro</i> fertilization, chronic hypertension, overt diabetes, kidney disease, and hematologic diseases, achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.70 (95% CI 0.65-0.75). Adding cord insertion site and placental location to the model (Model II) improved its predictive performance, resulting in an area under the ROC curve of 0.749 (95% CI 0.70-0.79, <i>p</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior placenta and marginal cord insertion were associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia. Further studies on prospective cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"2306189"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2306189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The relationship between placental location in pregnancies without previa and adverse pregnancy outcomes has not been well studied. Additionally, the impact of abnormal cord insertion sites remains controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the adverse outcomes associated with placental location and abnormal cord insertion in nulliparous women and to assess their impact on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital between January 2019 and June 2022. The study included nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies who delivered live infants and had available data on placental location and umbilical cord insertion site from a second- or third-trimester ultrasound. Placental location was categorized as anterior or posterior using transabdominal ultrasonography. The association between placental location/cord insertion site and pre-eclampsia was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. We compared the area under the curve to evaluate the impact of placental location and cord insertion site on pre-eclampsia.

Results: A total of 2219 pregnancies were included in the study. Pre-eclampsia occurred significantly more frequently in the anterior group than in the posterior group (8.21% vs. 3.04%, p < .001). In multivariate analysis investigating the association between placental location and pre-eclampsia, anterior placenta and marginal cord insertion showed increased odds ratios for pre-eclampsia of 3.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-6.58) and 3.64 (95% CI 1.90-6.97), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to predict pre-eclampsia using independent factors from multivariate analyses. Model I, including maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, in vitro fertilization, chronic hypertension, overt diabetes, kidney disease, and hematologic diseases, achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.70 (95% CI 0.65-0.75). Adding cord insertion site and placental location to the model (Model II) improved its predictive performance, resulting in an area under the ROC curve of 0.749 (95% CI 0.70-0.79, p = .02).

Conclusions: Anterior placenta and marginal cord insertion were associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia. Further studies on prospective cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.

胎盘位置和脐带插入部位与先兆子痫的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:关于无前置胎盘妊娠中胎盘位置与不良妊娠结局之间的关系,目前还没有很好的研究。此外,异常脐带插入部位的影响仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在探讨与无前置胎盘妇女的胎盘位置和异常脐带插入有关的不良妊娠结局,并评估其对妊娠结局的影响:这项回顾性队列研究于 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月在一家三甲医院进行。研究对象包括单胎妊娠、分娩过活产婴儿且有第二或第三孕期超声检查胎盘位置和脐带插入部位数据的无子宫妊娠妇女。胎盘位置通过经腹超声波检查分为前置胎盘和后置胎盘。使用多变量逻辑回归分析评估了胎盘位置/脐带插入部位与先兆子痫之间的关系。我们比较了曲线下面积,以评估胎盘位置和脐带插入部位对子痫前期的影响:结果:本研究共纳入 2219 例妊娠。子痫前期在前置胎盘组的发生率明显高于后置胎盘组(前置胎盘组为 8.21%,后置胎盘组为 3.04%,P<0.05),前置胎盘组包括体外受精、慢性高血压、明显糖尿病、肾脏疾病和血液病,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.70(95% CI 0.65-0.75)。在模型(模型 II)中加入脐带插入部位和胎盘位置可提高其预测性能,使 ROC 曲线下面积达到 0.749 (95% CI 0.70-0.79, p = .02):结论:前置胎盘和边缘脐带插入与先兆子痫风险增加有关。结论:前置胎盘和边缘脐带插入与先兆子痫风险增加有关,有必要对前瞻性队列进行进一步研究,以验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信