Stanislav Kolpakov, Arseniy Yashkin, Svetlana Ukraintseva, Anatoliy Yashin, Igor Akushevich
{"title":"Genome-Related Mechanisms Contributing to Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Incidence Between White and Black Older US Adults.","authors":"Stanislav Kolpakov, Arseniy Yashkin, Svetlana Ukraintseva, Anatoliy Yashin, Igor Akushevich","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-01907-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this manuscript, we leverage a modified GWAS algorithm adapted for use with multidimensional Cox models and data from the Health and Retirement Study to explore how genetic variation influences the size of the disparity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) incidence between older Black and White US adults. We identified four loci that were associated with higher AD incidence levels in older Black adults: (1) rs11077034 (hazard ratio (HR), 4.98) from the RBFOX1 gene; (2) rs7144494 (HR, 1.68) from the HISLA gene; (3) rs7660552 (HR, 3.07) from the SLC25A4 gene; and (4) rs12599485 (HR, 3.181) from the NIP30 gene. The RBFOX1, HISLA, SLC25A4, and NIP30 genes are known to be associated with AD (RBFOX1, NIP30) directly, and also influence the risk of AD risk-related morbidities such as hypertension (RBFOX1, SLC25A4), depression (SLC25A4), and certain cancers (HISLA, SLC25A4). A likely disparity-generating mechanism may lie in endocytosis and abnormal tissue growing mechanisms, depending on inherited gene mutations and the structure of proxies as well as gene-environment interactions with other risk factors such as lifestyle, education level, and access to adequate medical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"674-684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-01907-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this manuscript, we leverage a modified GWAS algorithm adapted for use with multidimensional Cox models and data from the Health and Retirement Study to explore how genetic variation influences the size of the disparity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) incidence between older Black and White US adults. We identified four loci that were associated with higher AD incidence levels in older Black adults: (1) rs11077034 (hazard ratio (HR), 4.98) from the RBFOX1 gene; (2) rs7144494 (HR, 1.68) from the HISLA gene; (3) rs7660552 (HR, 3.07) from the SLC25A4 gene; and (4) rs12599485 (HR, 3.181) from the NIP30 gene. The RBFOX1, HISLA, SLC25A4, and NIP30 genes are known to be associated with AD (RBFOX1, NIP30) directly, and also influence the risk of AD risk-related morbidities such as hypertension (RBFOX1, SLC25A4), depression (SLC25A4), and certain cancers (HISLA, SLC25A4). A likely disparity-generating mechanism may lie in endocytosis and abnormal tissue growing mechanisms, depending on inherited gene mutations and the structure of proxies as well as gene-environment interactions with other risk factors such as lifestyle, education level, and access to adequate medical services.
导致美国白人和黑人老年人阿尔茨海默病发病率差异的基因组相关机制》(Genome-Related Mechanisms Contributing to Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Incidence Between White and Black Older US Adults)。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.