Trends, demographics and reoperation rates of periacetabular osteotomy: an analysis from the PearlDiver database

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Stephen D Bigach, Akshar P Thakkar, Lucas T Buchler, Michael B Ellman, Sanjeev Bhatia, Michael D Stover
{"title":"Trends, demographics and reoperation rates of periacetabular osteotomy: an analysis from the PearlDiver database","authors":"Stephen D Bigach, Akshar P Thakkar, Lucas T Buchler, Michael B Ellman, Sanjeev Bhatia, Michael D Stover","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnad040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the trends and demographics of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in the United States from 2016 to 2020 using a large healthcare database analysis. The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who underwent a PAO procedure starting with current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 27299, S2115 and 27146. Subsequently, the population was filtered for patients being ages 12–50, having an inpatient charge-type and those having a length of stay of at least 1 day. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were filtered out, and the resulting population was filtered by ICD-10 diagnosis codes. The providers of each patient were also examined to ensure their history of treating hip dysplasia. Student t and multiple regression analysis tests were used for statistical comparisons and trends analysis (P < 0.05 reported as significant). A total of 535 consecutive patients were analyzed over the study period. There was a higher incidence of PAO in females compared with males (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of PAO in patients aged 15–19 years compared with older age groups (P = 0.017). Within the first year after the index PAO, 171 of the 535 patients, almost one-third (32%), received a reoperation. Of the 171 reoperations, 115 were deep removal of implant, 55 were a hip arthroscopy and 1 patient had a bone excision for heterotopic ossification. Similar studies should be carried out using other large health databases to confirm the external validity of these trends and rates across the United States.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnad040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the trends and demographics of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in the United States from 2016 to 2020 using a large healthcare database analysis. The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who underwent a PAO procedure starting with current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 27299, S2115 and 27146. Subsequently, the population was filtered for patients being ages 12–50, having an inpatient charge-type and those having a length of stay of at least 1 day. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were filtered out, and the resulting population was filtered by ICD-10 diagnosis codes. The providers of each patient were also examined to ensure their history of treating hip dysplasia. Student t and multiple regression analysis tests were used for statistical comparisons and trends analysis (P < 0.05 reported as significant). A total of 535 consecutive patients were analyzed over the study period. There was a higher incidence of PAO in females compared with males (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of PAO in patients aged 15–19 years compared with older age groups (P = 0.017). Within the first year after the index PAO, 171 of the 535 patients, almost one-third (32%), received a reoperation. Of the 171 reoperations, 115 were deep removal of implant, 55 were a hip arthroscopy and 1 patient had a bone excision for heterotopic ossification. Similar studies should be carried out using other large health databases to confirm the external validity of these trends and rates across the United States.
髋臼周围截骨术的趋势、人口统计学和再手术率:PearlDiver 数据库分析
本研究旨在通过大型医疗保健数据库分析,研究 2016 年至 2020 年美国髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的发展趋势和人口统计数据。研究人员从 PearlDiver 数据库中查询了接受 PAO 手术的患者,这些患者的当前手术术语(CPT)代码为 27299、S2115 和 27146。随后,筛选出年龄在 12-50 岁、住院费用类型和住院时间至少为 1 天的患者。过滤掉了全髋关节置换术患者,并根据 ICD-10 诊断代码过滤出了患者群体。此外,还对每位患者的医疗服务提供者进行了调查,以确保他们有治疗髋关节发育不良的历史。统计比较和趋势分析采用了学生 t 检验和多元回归分析检验(P < 0.05 为显著)。在研究期间,共对 535 名连续患者进行了分析。女性 PAO 发病率高于男性(P < 0.001),15-19 岁患者 PAO 发病率高于老年患者(P = 0.017)。在指数 PAO 后的第一年内,535 名患者中有 171 人(近三分之一(32%))接受了再次手术。在这 171 例再次手术中,115 例是深部移除植入物,55 例是髋关节镜手术,1 例患者因异位骨化进行了骨切除术。应利用其他大型健康数据库开展类似研究,以确认全美这些趋势和比率的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信