Contradiction with enzymatic stoichiometry theory: Persistent low ratios of β-glucosidase to phosphomonoesterase following 10-year continuous phosphorus fertilization in three subtropical forests

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Taiki Mori , Cong Wang , Senhao Wang , Wei Zhang , Jiangming Mo
{"title":"Contradiction with enzymatic stoichiometry theory: Persistent low ratios of β-glucosidase to phosphomonoesterase following 10-year continuous phosphorus fertilization in three subtropical forests","authors":"Taiki Mori ,&nbsp;Cong Wang ,&nbsp;Senhao Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiangming Mo","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2024.150931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ratio of β-glucosidase (BG) to phosphomonoesterase (PME) activity (BG:PME) is often used to predict the intensity of microbial phosphorus (P) shortage, with lower BG:PME indicating stronger P shortage (enzymatic stoichiometry theory). Here, we demonstrated that 10-year continuous P fertilization as high as 150 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> in the form of NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> solution did not elevate the BG:PME up to the level of other terrestrial ecosystems. The BG:PME of primary, secondary, and planted forests were 0.094, 0.067, and 0.089, respectively in P-fertilized plots, which were much lower than global average (0.62 ± 0.04), despite the fact that Bray-extracted P contents were substantially elevated (more than 600 times). Thus, the findings of the current study suggest that BG:PME overestimates P shortage in our P-enriched forests, implying that the enzymatic stoichiometry theory may not be universally applicable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405624008023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ratio of β-glucosidase (BG) to phosphomonoesterase (PME) activity (BG:PME) is often used to predict the intensity of microbial phosphorus (P) shortage, with lower BG:PME indicating stronger P shortage (enzymatic stoichiometry theory). Here, we demonstrated that 10-year continuous P fertilization as high as 150 kg P ha−1 yr−1 in the form of NaH2PO4 solution did not elevate the BG:PME up to the level of other terrestrial ecosystems. The BG:PME of primary, secondary, and planted forests were 0.094, 0.067, and 0.089, respectively in P-fertilized plots, which were much lower than global average (0.62 ± 0.04), despite the fact that Bray-extracted P contents were substantially elevated (more than 600 times). Thus, the findings of the current study suggest that BG:PME overestimates P shortage in our P-enriched forests, implying that the enzymatic stoichiometry theory may not be universally applicable.

与酶的化学计量理论相矛盾:三片亚热带森林连续 10 年施用磷肥后,β-葡萄糖苷酶与磷单酯酶的比率持续偏低
β-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)与磷单酯酶(PME)活性之比(BG:PME)通常被用来预测微生物缺磷(P)的强度,BG:PME越低表明缺磷越强(酶的化学计量理论)。在这里,我们证明了连续 10 年以 NaH2PO4 溶液形式施用高达 150 kg P ha-1 yr-1 的磷肥并不会使 BG:PME 提高到其他陆地生态系统的水平。在施过钾肥的地块中,原始林、次生林和人工林的 BG:PME 分别为 0.094、0.067 和 0.089,远低于全球平均水平(0.62 ± 0.04),尽管布雷提取的钾含量大幅提高(超过 600 倍)。因此,本研究的结果表明,BG:PME 高估了我国富含 P 的森林中 P 的缺乏程度,这意味着酶的化学计量理论可能并不普遍适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedobiologia
Pedobiologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments. Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions. We publish: original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects); descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research; innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信