Gut microbiota and clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced cancer

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
{"title":"Gut microbiota and clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2024.100698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is currently no well-accepted consensus on the association between gut microbiota and the response to treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fecal samples were collected before ICI treatment. Gut microbiota was analyzed using 16 S ribosomal RNA sequencing. We investigated the relationship between the α-diversity of fecal microbiota and patients’ clinical outcomes. Microbiota profiles from patients and healthy controls were determined. Pre-treatment serum was examined by cytokine array.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We analyzed 74 patients, including 42 with melanoma, 8 with kidney cancer, 13 with lung cancer, and 11 with other cancers. Combination therapy of <em>anti</em>-PD1 and <em>anti</em>-CTLA-4 was used in 14 patients, and monotherapy in the rest. Clinical benefit was observed in 35 (47.3 %) cases, including 2 complete responses, 16 partial responses, and 17 stable diseases according to RECIST criteria. No significant difference in α-diversity was found between the benefiter and non-benefiter groups. However, patients with α-diversity within the range of our healthy control had a significantly longer median overall survival (18.9 months), compared to the abnormal group (8.2 months) (<em>p</em> = 0.041, hazard ratio = 0.546) for all patients. The microbiota composition of the benefiters was similar to that of healthy individuals. Furthermore, specific bacteria, such as <em>Prevotella copri</em> and <em>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</em>, were associated with a favorable outcome. We also observed that serum IL-18 before treatment was significantly lower in the benefiters, compared to non-benefiters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The α-diversity of gut microbiota is positively correlated with more prolonged overall survival in cancer patients following ICI therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":"47 5","pages":"Article 100698"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2319417024000015/pdfft?md5=06962946a4c13b4e2c4a2f0a22540d06&pid=1-s2.0-S2319417024000015-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2319417024000015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is currently no well-accepted consensus on the association between gut microbiota and the response to treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods

Fecal samples were collected before ICI treatment. Gut microbiota was analyzed using 16 S ribosomal RNA sequencing. We investigated the relationship between the α-diversity of fecal microbiota and patients’ clinical outcomes. Microbiota profiles from patients and healthy controls were determined. Pre-treatment serum was examined by cytokine array.

Results

We analyzed 74 patients, including 42 with melanoma, 8 with kidney cancer, 13 with lung cancer, and 11 with other cancers. Combination therapy of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 was used in 14 patients, and monotherapy in the rest. Clinical benefit was observed in 35 (47.3 %) cases, including 2 complete responses, 16 partial responses, and 17 stable diseases according to RECIST criteria. No significant difference in α-diversity was found between the benefiter and non-benefiter groups. However, patients with α-diversity within the range of our healthy control had a significantly longer median overall survival (18.9 months), compared to the abnormal group (8.2 months) (p = 0.041, hazard ratio = 0.546) for all patients. The microbiota composition of the benefiters was similar to that of healthy individuals. Furthermore, specific bacteria, such as Prevotella copri and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, were associated with a favorable outcome. We also observed that serum IL-18 before treatment was significantly lower in the benefiters, compared to non-benefiters.

Conclusions

The α-diversity of gut microbiota is positively correlated with more prolonged overall survival in cancer patients following ICI therapy.

肠道微生物群与晚期癌症患者对免疫检查点抑制剂疗法的临床反应
背景关于晚期癌症患者肠道微生物群与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗反应之间的关系,目前还没有公认的共识。采用 16 S 核糖体 RNA 测序分析肠道微生物群。我们研究了粪便微生物群的α-多样性与患者临床预后之间的关系。我们测定了患者和健康对照组的微生物群谱。结果我们分析了74名患者,包括42名黑色素瘤患者、8名肾癌患者、13名肺癌患者和11名其他癌症患者。14名患者接受了抗PD1和抗CTLA-4联合疗法,其余患者接受了单一疗法。根据RECIST标准,35例(47.3%)患者观察到临床获益,包括2例完全应答、16例部分应答和17例病情稳定。受益组和非受益组在α多样性方面没有发现明显差异。不过,在所有患者中,α多样性在健康对照组范围内的患者的中位总生存期(18.9个月)明显长于异常组(8.2个月)(P = 0.041,危险比 = 0.546)。受益者的微生物群组成与健康人相似。此外,特定的细菌,如 copri Prevotella 和 Prausnitzii Faecalibacterium,与良好的预后有关。我们还观察到,与非受益者相比,受益者在治疗前的血清 IL-18 明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Journal
Biomedical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs. Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology. A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信