Perceptions and beliefs on sports injury prediction as an injury risk reduction strategy: An online survey on elite athletics (track and field) athletes, coaches, and health professionals

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q1 REHABILITATION

Physical Therapy in Sport Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.007

Pierre-Eddy Dandrieux , Laurent Navarro , Joris Chapon , Jeanne Tondut , Michael Zyskowski , Karsten Hollander , Pascal Edouard

{"title":"Perceptions and beliefs on sports injury prediction as an injury risk reduction strategy: An online survey on elite athletics (track and field) athletes, coaches, and health professionals","authors":"Pierre-Eddy Dandrieux , Laurent Navarro , Joris Chapon , Jeanne Tondut , Michael Zyskowski , Karsten Hollander , Pascal Edouard","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To explore perceptions and beliefs of elite athletics (track and field) athletes, coaches, and health professionals, towards the use of injury prediction as an injury risk reduction strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>During the 2022 European Athletics Championships in Munich, registered athletes, coaches, and health professionals were asked to complete an online questionnaire on their perceptions and beliefs of injury prediction use as an injury risk reduction strategy. The perceived level of interest, intent to use, help, potential stress (psychological impact) and dissemination were assessed by a score from 0 to 100.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We collected 54 responses from 17 countries. Elite athletics stakeholders expressed a perceived level of interest, intent to use, and help of injury prediction of (mean ± SD) 85 ± 16, 84 ± 16, and 85 ± 15, respectively. The perceived level of potential stress was 41 ± 33 (range from 0 to 100), with an important inter-individual variability in each elite athletics stakeholder's category.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This was the first study investigating the perceptions and beliefs of elite athletics stakeholders regarding the use of injury prediction as an injury risk reduction strategy. Regardless of the stakeholders, there was a high perceived level of interest, intent to use and help reported in this potential strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To explore perceptions and beliefs of elite athletics (track and field) athletes, coaches, and health professionals, towards the use of injury prediction as an injury risk reduction strategy.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Method

During the 2022 European Athletics Championships in Munich, registered athletes, coaches, and health professionals were asked to complete an online questionnaire on their perceptions and beliefs of injury prediction use as an injury risk reduction strategy. The perceived level of interest, intent to use, help, potential stress (psychological impact) and dissemination were assessed by a score from 0 to 100.

Results

We collected 54 responses from 17 countries. Elite athletics stakeholders expressed a perceived level of interest, intent to use, and help of injury prediction of (mean ± SD) 85 ± 16, 84 ± 16, and 85 ± 15, respectively. The perceived level of potential stress was 41 ± 33 (range from 0 to 100), with an important inter-individual variability in each elite athletics stakeholder's category.

Conclusions

This was the first study investigating the perceptions and beliefs of elite athletics stakeholders regarding the use of injury prediction as an injury risk reduction strategy. Regardless of the stakeholders, there was a high perceived level of interest, intent to use and help reported in this potential strategy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对运动损伤预测作为降低损伤风险策略的看法和信念：针对精英田径（田径）运动员、教练员和医疗专业人员的在线调查

目的探讨精英田径（田径）运动员、教练员和卫生专业人员对使用损伤预测作为降低损伤风险策略的看法和信念。方法在 2022 年慕尼黑欧洲田径锦标赛期间，要求注册运动员、教练员和卫生专业人员完成一份在线问卷，了解他们对使用损伤预测作为降低损伤风险策略的看法和信念。他们对伤害预测的兴趣、使用意向、帮助、潜在压力（心理影响）和传播的认知水平进行了从 0 到 100 分的评估。竞技体育精英利益相关者对损伤预测的兴趣度、使用意向和帮助程度的感知分别为（平均值±标准差）85±16、84±16 和 85±15。潜在压力感知水平为 41 ± 33（范围从 0 到 100），每个精英田径利益相关者类别的个体间差异很大。不论是哪种利益相关者，对这一潜在策略的兴趣、使用意向和帮助程度都很高。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

8.30%

发文量

125

审稿时长

39 days

期刊介绍： Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.