{"title":"Quality assurance struggle in higher education institutions: moving towards an effective quality assurance management system","authors":"Meshal Abdulaziz Aldhobaib","doi":"10.1007/s10734-024-01182-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quality assurance (QA) is considered a critical component in higher education institutions (HEIs) and their academic programmes in the twenty-first century. Despite significant investments to enhance QA in HEIs, contemporary research suggests that QA systems may not always meet the expectations of HEI stakeholders. The literature review suggests that differing interpretations of ‘quality’ in HE can impact the progress of QA and related issues. This study, therefore, aims to empirically investigate the reality of QA in HEIs, specifically how it is perceived and implemented in these institutions. Additionally, it seeks to identify challenges impacting the success of QA and propose practical solutions that may improve QA systems in HEIs. Applying a qualitative ethnographic approach, this research includes in-depth interviews with 53 participants, both participant and non-participant observations, and document analyses at three universities (two public and one private), as well as related QA agencies. The findings of this study offer a range of theoretical and practical insights. Most notably, they contribute to the existing literature on QA and HEIs by providing detailed evidence of the contentious aspects of QA and their implications, particularly regarding the understanding and implications of QA in HEIs from the perspective of relevant participants. Furthermore, the study provides QA policymakers (both external and internal), staff, and general members of HEIs with various challenges and practical solutions for enhancing awareness and engagement with QA issues. Finally, the conclusion and implications section outlines key areas for future research in different contexts of the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":48383,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education","volume":"206 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01182-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quality assurance (QA) is considered a critical component in higher education institutions (HEIs) and their academic programmes in the twenty-first century. Despite significant investments to enhance QA in HEIs, contemporary research suggests that QA systems may not always meet the expectations of HEI stakeholders. The literature review suggests that differing interpretations of ‘quality’ in HE can impact the progress of QA and related issues. This study, therefore, aims to empirically investigate the reality of QA in HEIs, specifically how it is perceived and implemented in these institutions. Additionally, it seeks to identify challenges impacting the success of QA and propose practical solutions that may improve QA systems in HEIs. Applying a qualitative ethnographic approach, this research includes in-depth interviews with 53 participants, both participant and non-participant observations, and document analyses at three universities (two public and one private), as well as related QA agencies. The findings of this study offer a range of theoretical and practical insights. Most notably, they contribute to the existing literature on QA and HEIs by providing detailed evidence of the contentious aspects of QA and their implications, particularly regarding the understanding and implications of QA in HEIs from the perspective of relevant participants. Furthermore, the study provides QA policymakers (both external and internal), staff, and general members of HEIs with various challenges and practical solutions for enhancing awareness and engagement with QA issues. Finally, the conclusion and implications section outlines key areas for future research in different contexts of the world.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education is recognised as the leading international journal of Higher Education studies, publishing twelve separate numbers each year. Since its establishment in 1972, Higher Education has followed educational developments throughout the world in universities, polytechnics, colleges, and vocational and education institutions. It has actively endeavoured to report on developments in both public and private Higher Education sectors. Contributions have come from leading scholars from different countries while articles have tackled the problems of teachers as well as students, and of planners as well as administrators.
While each Higher Education system has its own distinctive features, common problems and issues are shared internationally by researchers, teachers and institutional leaders. Higher Education offers opportunities for exchange of research results, experience and insights, and provides a forum for ongoing discussion between experts.
Higher Education publishes authoritative overview articles, comparative studies and analyses of particular problems or issues. All contributions are peer reviewed.