Paraconsistent reasoning for inconsistency measurement in declarative process specifications

IF 3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Carl Corea , Isabelle Kuhlmann , Matthias Thimm , John Grant
{"title":"Paraconsistent reasoning for inconsistency measurement in declarative process specifications","authors":"Carl Corea ,&nbsp;Isabelle Kuhlmann ,&nbsp;Matthias Thimm ,&nbsp;John Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.is.2024.102347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inconsistency is a core problem in fields such as AI and data-intensive systems. In this work, we address the problem of <em>measuring</em> inconsistency in declarative process specifications, with an emphasis on linear temporal logic (LTL). As we will show, existing inconsistency measures for classical logic cannot provide a meaningful assessment of inconsistency in LTL in general, as they cannot adequately handle the temporal operators. We therefore propose a novel paraconsistent semantics for LTL over fixed traces (LTL<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mtext>ff</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span>) as a framework for time-sensitive inconsistency measurement. We develop and implement novel approaches for (element-based) inconsistency measurement, and propose a novel semantics for reasoning in LTL<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mtext>ff</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span> in the presence of preference relations between formulas. We implement our approach for inconsistency measurement with Answer Set Programming and evaluate our results with real-life data sets from the Business Process Intelligence Challenge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50363,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030643792400005X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inconsistency is a core problem in fields such as AI and data-intensive systems. In this work, we address the problem of measuring inconsistency in declarative process specifications, with an emphasis on linear temporal logic (LTL). As we will show, existing inconsistency measures for classical logic cannot provide a meaningful assessment of inconsistency in LTL in general, as they cannot adequately handle the temporal operators. We therefore propose a novel paraconsistent semantics for LTL over fixed traces (LTLff) as a framework for time-sensitive inconsistency measurement. We develop and implement novel approaches for (element-based) inconsistency measurement, and propose a novel semantics for reasoning in LTLff in the presence of preference relations between formulas. We implement our approach for inconsistency measurement with Answer Set Programming and evaluate our results with real-life data sets from the Business Process Intelligence Challenge.

用于测量声明式流程规范中不一致性的旁证推理
不一致性是人工智能和数据密集型系统等领域的核心问题。在这项研究中,我们以线性时态逻辑(LTL)为重点,探讨了声明式流程规范中不一致性的测量问题。正如我们将展示的那样,现有的经典逻辑不一致性度量方法无法对 LTL 中的不一致性进行有意义的评估,因为它们无法充分处理时态算子。因此,我们为固定踪迹的 LTL(LTLff)提出了一种新的准一致性语义,作为对时间敏感的不一致性测量框架。我们开发并实现了(基于元素的)不一致性度量的新方法,并提出了在存在公式间偏好关系的 LTLff 中进行推理的新语义。我们用答案集编程实现了不一致性测量方法,并用业务流程智能挑战赛的真实数据集评估了我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems
Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
112
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Information systems are the software and hardware systems that support data-intensive applications. The journal Information Systems publishes articles concerning the design and implementation of languages, data models, process models, algorithms, software and hardware for information systems. Subject areas include data management issues as presented in the principal international database conferences (e.g., ACM SIGMOD/PODS, VLDB, ICDE and ICDT/EDBT) as well as data-related issues from the fields of data mining/machine learning, information retrieval coordinated with structured data, internet and cloud data management, business process management, web semantics, visual and audio information systems, scientific computing, and data science. Implementation papers having to do with massively parallel data management, fault tolerance in practice, and special purpose hardware for data-intensive systems are also welcome. Manuscripts from application domains, such as urban informatics, social and natural science, and Internet of Things, are also welcome. All papers should highlight innovative solutions to data management problems such as new data models, performance enhancements, and show how those innovations contribute to the goals of the application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信