Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xunli Zhang , Lingwei Zheng , Shangqi Ge , Xudong Zheng , Xinyu Xie
{"title":"Electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism and laboratory tests of pulsating direct current with a high energy efficiency ratio","authors":"Xunli Zhang ,&nbsp;Lingwei Zheng ,&nbsp;Shangqi Ge ,&nbsp;Xudong Zheng ,&nbsp;Xinyu Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on the electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism of pulsating direct current (PDC) with a high energy efficiency ratio, the calculation method of PDC electroosmosis drainage rate was verified under different potential gradients using two forms of voltage loading, i.e., constant direct current (CDC) and PDC. The drainage weight and electric current were achieved by laboratory tests, and then the energy efficiency ratio, soil resistivity and contact resistance was calculated. The energy consumption of each test group was analyzed by considering the initial potential gradient. The obtained results show that under the same potential gradient, the difference in soil resistivity and electroosmotic drainage between PDC and CDC is not significant, but there is a significant difference in contact resistance, which leads to low current intensity and high energy efficiency ratio in the PDC test group. The expression of the electroosmotic drainage rate of the PDC is described with the coefficient μ, and then the energy efficiency ratio versus potential gradient curve is calculated, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. The reason for the lower energy consumption of PDC electroosmosis compared to CDC is described in terms of the drainage mechanism of electroosmosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"64 1","pages":"Article 101423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000015/pdfft?md5=d29542071600ab5d505c84df053ff0a6&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000015-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the electroosmotic reinforcement mechanism of pulsating direct current (PDC) with a high energy efficiency ratio, the calculation method of PDC electroosmosis drainage rate was verified under different potential gradients using two forms of voltage loading, i.e., constant direct current (CDC) and PDC. The drainage weight and electric current were achieved by laboratory tests, and then the energy efficiency ratio, soil resistivity and contact resistance was calculated. The energy consumption of each test group was analyzed by considering the initial potential gradient. The obtained results show that under the same potential gradient, the difference in soil resistivity and electroosmotic drainage between PDC and CDC is not significant, but there is a significant difference in contact resistance, which leads to low current intensity and high energy efficiency ratio in the PDC test group. The expression of the electroosmotic drainage rate of the PDC is described with the coefficient μ, and then the energy efficiency ratio versus potential gradient curve is calculated, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. The reason for the lower energy consumption of PDC electroosmosis compared to CDC is described in terms of the drainage mechanism of electroosmosis.

高能效比脉动直流电的电渗强化机制和实验室测试
基于脉动直流电(PDC)高能效比的电渗加固机理,利用恒定直流电(CDC)和脉动直流电(PDC)两种电压加载形式,验证了不同电位梯度下脉动直流电渗排水率的计算方法。通过实验室试验获得排水重量和电流,然后计算能效比、土壤电阻率和接触电阻。考虑到初始电位梯度,分析了各试验组的能耗。结果表明,在相同的电位梯度下,PDC 和 CDC 的土壤电阻率和电渗排水量差异不大,但接触电阻差异显著,这导致 PDC 试验组的电流强度低、能效比高。用系数 μ 描述了 PDC 电渗排水率的表达式,然后计算了能效比与电位梯度的关系曲线,与实验结果吻合良好。从电渗排水机理的角度说明了 PDC 电渗能耗低于 CDC 的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信