Predictive Brain Activity Shows Congruent Semantic Specificity in Language Comprehension and Production.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Luigi Grisoni, Isabella P Boux, Friedemann Pulvermüller
{"title":"Predictive Brain Activity Shows Congruent Semantic Specificity in Language Comprehension and Production.","authors":"Luigi Grisoni, Isabella P Boux, Friedemann Pulvermüller","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1723-23.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sentence fragments strongly predicting a specific subsequent meaningful word elicit larger preword slow waves, prediction potentials (PPs), than unpredictive contexts. To test the current predictive processing models, 128-channel EEG data were collected from both sexes to examine whether (1) different semantic PPs are elicited in language comprehension and production and (2) whether these PPs originate from the same specific \"prediction area(s)\" or rather from widely distributed category-specific neuronal circuits reflecting the meaning of the predicted item. Slow waves larger after predictable than unpredictable contexts were present both before subjects heard the sentence-final word in the comprehension experiment and before they pronounced the sentence-final word in the production experiment. Crucially, cortical sources underlying the semantic PP were distributed across several cortical areas and differed between the semantic categories of the expected words. In both production and comprehension, the anticipation of animal words was reflected by sources in posterior visual areas, whereas predictable tool words were preceded by sources in the frontocentral sensorimotor cortex. For both modalities, PP size increased with higher cloze probability, thus further confirming that it reflects semantic prediction, and with shorter latencies with which participants completed sentence fragments. These results sit well with theories viewing distributed semantic category-specific circuits as the mechanistic basis of semantic prediction in the two modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10957213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1723-23.2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sentence fragments strongly predicting a specific subsequent meaningful word elicit larger preword slow waves, prediction potentials (PPs), than unpredictive contexts. To test the current predictive processing models, 128-channel EEG data were collected from both sexes to examine whether (1) different semantic PPs are elicited in language comprehension and production and (2) whether these PPs originate from the same specific "prediction area(s)" or rather from widely distributed category-specific neuronal circuits reflecting the meaning of the predicted item. Slow waves larger after predictable than unpredictable contexts were present both before subjects heard the sentence-final word in the comprehension experiment and before they pronounced the sentence-final word in the production experiment. Crucially, cortical sources underlying the semantic PP were distributed across several cortical areas and differed between the semantic categories of the expected words. In both production and comprehension, the anticipation of animal words was reflected by sources in posterior visual areas, whereas predictable tool words were preceded by sources in the frontocentral sensorimotor cortex. For both modalities, PP size increased with higher cloze probability, thus further confirming that it reflects semantic prediction, and with shorter latencies with which participants completed sentence fragments. These results sit well with theories viewing distributed semantic category-specific circuits as the mechanistic basis of semantic prediction in the two modalities.

预测性大脑活动在语言理解和生成中显示出一致的语义特异性。
与非预测性语境相比,强烈预测后续特定意义词的句子片段会引发更大的词前慢波,即预测电位(PP)。为了检验当前的预测处理模型,研究人员收集了男女两性的 128 通道脑电图数据,以检验:(i) 在语言理解和语言生成过程中是否会引发不同的语义预测电位;(ii) 这些预测电位是否来自相同的特定 "预测区域",还是来自广泛分布的反映预测项目含义的特定类别神经元回路。在理解实验中,受试者听到句子最后一个单词之前,以及在制作实验中受试者发音句子最后一个单词之前,可预测语境后的慢波都比不可预测语境后的慢波大。最重要的是,语义PP的皮层来源分布在多个皮层区域,并且在预期词的语义类别之间存在差异。在制作和理解过程中,对动物词的预期反映在后部视觉区域,而对工具词的预期则反映在前中心感觉运动皮层。在这两种模式中,PP 的大小随着掐头去尾概率的增加而增加,从而进一步证实了语义预测得到了反映,而且参与者完成句子片段的潜伏期也缩短了。这些结果与将分布式语义类别特异性回路视为两种模态中语义预测的机理基础的理论不谋而合。 重要声明 我们报告了在语言理解和生产过程中,可预测句子结尾的句子片段比不可预测句子结尾的句子片段具有更大的预期负向预测电位(PP)。在生成和理解实验中,预测电位拓扑图彼此相似,但在每种模态下,预测电位在可预测词的语义类别之间存在相同的差异。同样,皮层源估计显示,不同模式下与预测相关的皮层激活相似,但反映预测符号意义的激活差异却一致。此外,PP 的大小与可预测性(Cloze 概率)和处理难易程度(反应时间)的行为测量相关联,而且在生成和理解中出现了相关的 PP;这些观察结果与不同模态的相似预测机制以及不同语义类型的不同预测机制是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信