Combining and segmenting geometric shapes into parts depending on symmetry type: Evidence from children and adults.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2024-01-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695231226157
Līga Zariņa, Jurģis Šķilters, Solvita Umbraško, Santa Bartušēvica
{"title":"Combining and segmenting geometric shapes into parts depending on symmetry type: Evidence from children and adults.","authors":"Līga Zariņa, Jurģis Šķilters, Solvita Umbraško, Santa Bartušēvica","doi":"10.1177/20416695231226157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Symmetry is an important geometric feature that affects object segmentation into parts, though De Winter and Wagemans note that partly occluded objects can still be identified by the remaining visible parts. In two sets of experiments with children (<i>n</i> = 31, age 7-11, <i>M</i> = 8.8, <i>SD</i> = 1.4) and adults (<i>n</i> = 19, age 17-57, <i>M</i> = 30.4, <i>SD</i> = 12.6), we used 13 basic geometric figures distinguished by symmetry types to test how they are naturally segmented or combined and what the developmental impacts are on the segmentation and combination. In the first experiment, participants were asked to cut figures into two along a straight line; in the second experiment, participants had to create five sets of connected two-figure combinations where overlapping figures were allowed. The results confirmed the importance of the symmetry axis in both tasks. Other relevant criteria were dividing into half, maximal/minimal curvature, and use of edges or corners for reference. This study allows comparisons of the impact of symmetry type on the segmentation and combining of geometric figures and indicates developmental differences between children and adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695231226157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Symmetry is an important geometric feature that affects object segmentation into parts, though De Winter and Wagemans note that partly occluded objects can still be identified by the remaining visible parts. In two sets of experiments with children (n = 31, age 7-11, M = 8.8, SD = 1.4) and adults (n = 19, age 17-57, M = 30.4, SD = 12.6), we used 13 basic geometric figures distinguished by symmetry types to test how they are naturally segmented or combined and what the developmental impacts are on the segmentation and combination. In the first experiment, participants were asked to cut figures into two along a straight line; in the second experiment, participants had to create five sets of connected two-figure combinations where overlapping figures were allowed. The results confirmed the importance of the symmetry axis in both tasks. Other relevant criteria were dividing into half, maximal/minimal curvature, and use of edges or corners for reference. This study allows comparisons of the impact of symmetry type on the segmentation and combining of geometric figures and indicates developmental differences between children and adults.

根据对称类型将几何图形组合并分割成不同部分:来自儿童和成人的证据
尽管 De Winter 和 Wagemans 指出,部分遮挡的物体仍然可以通过剩余的可见部分识别出来,但对称性是影响物体分割成不同部分的一个重要几何特征。在以儿童(n = 31,7-11 岁,M = 8.8,SD = 1.4)和成人(n = 19,17-57 岁,M = 30.4,SD = 12.6)为对象的两组实验中,我们使用了 13 个按对称类型区分的基本几何图形,以测试它们是如何被自然分割或组合的,以及发育对分割和组合的影响。在第一个实验中,参与者被要求沿一条直线将图形一分为二;在第二个实验中,参与者必须创建五组相连的双图形组合,其中允许图形重叠。结果证实了对称轴在这两项任务中的重要性。其他相关标准还包括分成两半、最大/最小曲率以及使用边缘或角落作为参考。这项研究可以比较对称类型对几何图形的分割和组合的影响,并显示出儿童和成人之间的发展差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信